Skybluedownunder
Well-Known Member
Fuck I miss babestation, we don’t have that over in Aus.
I like the race to shoot your load while the nipples are out before they put them away again
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ratings (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
Fuck I miss babestation, we don’t have that over in Aus.
I like the race to shoot your load while the nipples are out before they put them away again
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Hamer finds his space IMO
I want to point you in the direction of all the Internet, or Internets, if you will.Fuck I miss babestation, we don’t have that over in Aus.
I like the race to shoot your load while the nipples are out before they put them away again
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Skybluedownunder
Well-Known Member
Not the same man…. I like the race against time before she hides the tits
Plus there’s multiple channels and there’s always some elite bird. You can be on pornhub scrolling 20 pages and still haven’t found THE ONE lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
The motion standsNot the same man…. I like the race against time before she hides the tits
Plus there’s multiple channels and there’s always some elite bird. You can be on pornhub scrolling 20 pages and still haven’t found THE ONE lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Not the same man…. I like the race against time before she hides the tits
Plus there’s multiple channels and there’s always some elite bird. You can be on pornhub scrolling 20 pages and still haven’t found THE ONE lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
Wilson 5
Kane 6
Bidwell 4
Doyle 5
McFadzean 6
Panzo 4
Hamer 7
Sheaf 4
Allen 6
O'Hare 7
Palmer 7
Kane 6
Bidwell 4
Doyle 5
McFadzean 6
Panzo 4
Hamer 7
Sheaf 4
Allen 6
O'Hare 7
Palmer 7
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Was his usual self, some good, some shite and lots of time missing.
Great_Expectations
Well-Known Member
Caveated with at least half the team were confirmed as ill by MR and those that weren’t specifically named will surely be confirmed as so over the next few days.
Wilson - 4 - we know he’s over his head, but was especially obvious today. Distribution was poor, but to be fair, at times when the press was on, he literally had no option but to punt it.
Kane - 5 - surprised at the high marks for Kane. Raised his one dimensional ‘cross it from anywhere’ as a concern pre-game, and despite having no striker, that’s what he did. Positionally he was all over the place, looked hesitant on the ball and wasn’t an effective outlet.
Doyle - 5 - poor for the goal. But actually cant recall him being that bad individually otherwise. Still looked confident on the ball when on the front foot.
McFadzean - 6.5 - some great blocks across both halves. Disappointed he didn’t get closer to Madine.
Panzo - 5 - poor in the air and positionally, as exemplified by letting a near like for like ball for the goal on Tuesday through the channel between him and the CB.
Bidwell - 5 - we know he’s (very limited) offensively, but today was non-existent. Also thought he’s have a better plan to stop Yates.
Hamer - 7.5 - absolutely the right Hamer again today. Carried us first half and really stood up as a leader.
Sheaf - 6 - poor due to a number of sloppy passes, but never hid, still wanted the ball and still made a number of good offensive passes.
Allen - 6 - ran around a lot, but can’t remember him doing anything (perhaps harsh) other than the volly past the post.
COH - 7.5 - how he made it though 90 minutes is incredible. Not as involved or sharp as we’d like but that’s to be expected. Still glimpses of him and still a step above most.
Palmer - 7 - tough ask today, hes clearly not a back to goal player, especially today when he was continuously fouled by their CB.
Subs
CBA
When our footballers played well together, we scored.
As we try to play more expansive and possession based football, our WB’s attacking and positional ability will hold us back.
Wilson - 4 - we know he’s over his head, but was especially obvious today. Distribution was poor, but to be fair, at times when the press was on, he literally had no option but to punt it.
Kane - 5 - surprised at the high marks for Kane. Raised his one dimensional ‘cross it from anywhere’ as a concern pre-game, and despite having no striker, that’s what he did. Positionally he was all over the place, looked hesitant on the ball and wasn’t an effective outlet.
Doyle - 5 - poor for the goal. But actually cant recall him being that bad individually otherwise. Still looked confident on the ball when on the front foot.
McFadzean - 6.5 - some great blocks across both halves. Disappointed he didn’t get closer to Madine.
Panzo - 5 - poor in the air and positionally, as exemplified by letting a near like for like ball for the goal on Tuesday through the channel between him and the CB.
Bidwell - 5 - we know he’s (very limited) offensively, but today was non-existent. Also thought he’s have a better plan to stop Yates.
Hamer - 7.5 - absolutely the right Hamer again today. Carried us first half and really stood up as a leader.
Sheaf - 6 - poor due to a number of sloppy passes, but never hid, still wanted the ball and still made a number of good offensive passes.
Allen - 6 - ran around a lot, but can’t remember him doing anything (perhaps harsh) other than the volly past the post.
COH - 7.5 - how he made it though 90 minutes is incredible. Not as involved or sharp as we’d like but that’s to be expected. Still glimpses of him and still a step above most.
Palmer - 7 - tough ask today, hes clearly not a back to goal player, especially today when he was continuously fouled by their CB.
Subs
CBA
When our footballers played well together, we scored.
As we try to play more expansive and possession based football, our WB’s attacking and positional ability will hold us back.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
All about decision making. Sheaf turned down a glorious chance to shoot early on, then to make up for it he took on shots which were never really on. That seems like a common pattern to me. The ball gets into the opponent's third and players either get caught in two minds or they go for the wrong option right away.
Where the players have a better understanding with each other it happens less often.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
Agree with @Great_Expectations and @Brighton Sky Blue comments.
If illness is as has been reported, then credit to the players in general for the effort that they put in. I have seen a lot worse displays from a City team (when supposedly fit). Disappointed (and thought we'd be hammered after the first 15 minutes) but we stuck in the game well, and improved as an attacking threat in the second half.
If illness is as has been reported, then credit to the players in general for the effort that they put in. I have seen a lot worse displays from a City team (when supposedly fit). Disappointed (and thought we'd be hammered after the first 15 minutes) but we stuck in the game well, and improved as an attacking threat in the second half.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Yup.
Thing is Harry, if this morning we had been told we would have to play with no striker and that pretty much half the team and nearly all the defence were going to have to play ill, we would have written the game off as a defeat anyway wouldn't we. We wouldn't have expected anything out of the game
Just a very unlucky day where sickness hit the club.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
At least O'Hare got through a full 90 minutes intact. One plus along with a very good goal.
larry_david
Well-Known Member
Learning curve for Doyle. That pass was never on. Just put it out for a throw and reset
Oggy or someone made a good point last week. These young lads from top academies are taught to never ever give the ball away. Keep possession at all times. But results don't matter in youth footy, so when they come out on loan they have to learn that it's not all about retaining possession and that's where Doyle went today. You put that out for a throw 10 times out of 10
Oggy or someone made a good point last week. These young lads from top academies are taught to never ever give the ball away. Keep possession at all times. But results don't matter in youth footy, so when they come out on loan they have to learn that it's not all about retaining possession and that's where Doyle went today. You put that out for a throw 10 times out of 10
Otis
Well-Known Member
Robins said he really wanted to take O'Hare off, because he shouldn't have played the full 90 mins, but that he had no choice because of the situation.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Indeed he probably shouldn't have even started. But in a game of about two positives that was one
SheafIsGod
Well-Known Member
Think we’re all forgetting the most important rating:
Robins: 1
get this fraud out of my club
Robins: 1
get this fraud out of my club
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Wilson was hopeless
Sheaf was hopeless
Doyle was naive and hopeless
Sheaf was hopeless
Doyle was naive and hopeless
Otis
Well-Known Member
pusbccfc
Well-Known Member
You've been a bit quiet about Sheaf recently
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Doyle has to be the most one footed player I've ever seen.
No way he should play on the right of any position again.
No way he should play on the right of any position again.
larry_david
Well-Known Member
Bidwell is too. He may be solid defensively but he's offered fuck all going forward since game 3. He just passes it back every time now.
People are kidding themselves when they say he's better than Maatsen.
Defensively yes he is, but overall Maatsen is a much better player and is better suited to the way we want to play.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Bidwell has been one of our better signings - he gets forward plenty and is an effective wing back - when you have Doyle and Panzo together at the back as well as Kane first start (he spends most time in the opponents half anyway) he’s bound to be cautious
He’s consistently been one of our better players this season
Otis
Well-Known Member
What did Robins get wrong? Wrong in having to play players who were ill? Should he have picked Gyokeres, who was apparently too ill to start?
Just wondering what else he could have done differently. We had at least 4 players out there that shouldn't have played, but had to. Walker was on the bench because he had only had one day's training and Eccles and Rose were missing through illness too.
So, what did he get wrong?
sylus
Well-Known Member
just my opinion of course, put i would never of started the game without a striker, was asking for trouble, he could of played walker first half and then vik the second at least we would of had some presence up top and not relying on o hare and palmer, even though they both done reasonably well, or he could of even included Tavares in the squad which would of given us some pace.
Feels like David Busst could have helped shore up the defence with his experience yesterday, why wasn’t he even on the bench?
hinckley cov
Well-Known Member
You can’t remember Doyle being that bad ? , I thought he was awful, didn’t win a thing in the air and is so one footed it defied belief.
sylus
Well-Known Member
that was fking shocking yesterday, and yes!!! i blame Robin's, his tactic's ,his team selection, we could and should of been 3-0 down before palmer scored, we were very lucky to go in at half time 1-0 up, even then i knew we would have to score again to ensure a result,
and yes, he can put yesterday's shocking performance down to a bug in the camp, or is that just a lame excuse.
and yes, he can put yesterday's shocking performance down to a bug in the camp, or is that just a lame excuse.