Ratings (1 Viewer)

sperrin07 · Nov 3, 2015

charles cook 5 - thought he was dodgy tonight, dropped a couple of balls and was making me nervous.

Phillips 6 - yet another penalty, was ok defensively but good assist

Ricketts 6 - is better at right back, was unlucky with their 2nd as he was fouled and it was handball

Martin 6 - was ok

Stokes 5 - won a few headers but didnt do much. Worked hard

Fleck 6 - nowhere near as good as saturday, too late releasing the ball but great ball to phillips for 2nd

Vincelot 6 - good booking in 96th min needs a rest saturday

Kent 7 - marked up slightly for getting his first goal, didnt do much else

Cole 6 - beckham esc free kick but didnt set the game alight. Few clever ideas that his feet struggled to execute

O'brien 7 - worked hard as usual, brilliant flick for 3rd goal

Armstrong 9 - 2 great finishes, constant threat, good pressure of defensive line

Murphy 6 - some good runs nearly scored

Lameiras 5 - ineffective

Tudgay 6 - didnt do much, deserves a chance saturday in Armstrongs absense.

Team for sat:
Burge
Phillips
Martin
Ricketts
Haynes
Fleck
Thomas
Murphy
Cole (if available)
Lameiras
Tudgay

Charles Cook
Stokes
Harries
Obrien
Fortune
Alliyu
Finch?

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Nov 3, 2015

Charles Cook 5
Phillips 4
Martin 5
Ricketts 5
Stokes 5
Vincelot 7
Fleck 6
Kent 6
Cole 6
JOB 7
Armstrong 8

Murphy 6
Lameiras 5
Tudgay 6

stupot07 · Nov 3, 2015

A difficult game to rate, we were brilliant for the first 20 minutes then pretty average for large periods. Very exciting game though.

RCC 5
Phillips 5
Martin 5
Tickets 5
Stokes 5
Fleck 6
Vincelot 6
Kent 6
Cole 6
JOB 7
Armstrong 9

Subs
Lamieres 4
Murphy 5
Tudguy 5

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

skyblue94 · Nov 3, 2015

Charles Cook 6- Looked a little more unsure of himself than in recent weeks but did make a worldie of a save at 3-2
Phillips 5- Did brilliantly down the right flank for Armstrong's first, but gave another penalty aware and at times looks frail defensively
Martin 5- Reflection of the defensive display in general tonight
Ricketts 5- Ditto
Stokes 6-
Vincelot 7
Fleck 6
Kent 6
Cole 5
JOB 7
Armstrong 8

Murphy 6
Lameiras 5
Tudgay 6

Yorkshire SB · Nov 3, 2015

sperrin07 said:
charles cook 5 - thought he was dodgy tonight, dropped a couple of balls and was making me nervous.

Phillips 6 - yet another penalty, was ok defensively but good assist

Ricketts 6 - is better at right back, was unlucky with their 2nd as he was fouled and it was handball

Martin 6 - was ok

Stokes 5 - won a few headers but didnt do much. Worked hard

Fleck 6 - nowhere near as good as saturday, too late releasing the ball but great ball to phillips for 2nd

Vincelot 6 - good booking in 96th min needs a rest saturday

Kent 7 - marked up slightly for getting his first goal, didnt do much else

Cole 6 - beckham esc free kick but didnt set the game alight. Few clever ideas that his feet struggled to execute

O'brien 7 - worked hard as usual, brilliant flick for 3rd goal

Armstrong 9 - 2 great finishes, constant threat, good pressure of defensive line

Murphy 6 - some good runs nearly scored

Lameiras 5 - ineffective

Tudgay 6 - didnt do much, deserves a chance saturday in Armstrongs absense.

Team for sat:
Burge
Phillips
Martin
Ricketts
Haynes
Fleck
Thomas
Murphy
Cole (if available)
Lameiras
Tudgay

Charles Cook
Stokes
Harries
Obrien
Fortune
Alliyu
Finch?

Got to question dropping stokes and vincelot there, they've been outstanding performers for us this year. Phillips and Haynes at full back would make me very nervous.

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Nov 3, 2015

templericoh said:
Got to question dropping stokes and vincelot there, they've been outstanding performers for us this year. Phillips and Haynes at full back would make me very nervous.

Vincelot is suspended for 5 yellows, give Stokes a deserved rest.

skyblue94 · Nov 4, 2015

Read on Twitter Sunday that Stokes dislocated his shoulder vs Peterborough and then when he went down tonight seemed a problem with the same shoulder. Would make sense to give him a week to recover and bring haynes in

covcity4life · Nov 4, 2015

Maybe it's a good sign that despite lowish ratings we scored 4? Obv coned ed 3 but still believe we are good enough to win league

sperrin07 · Nov 4, 2015

templericoh said:
Got to question dropping stokes and vincelot there, they've been outstanding performers for us this year. Phillips and Haynes at full back would make me very nervous.

Haynes needs minutes as hes only back up and stokes needs rest. Vincelots banned

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Nov 4, 2015

skyblue94 said:
Read on Twitter Sunday that Stokes dislocated his shoulder vs Peterborough and then when he went down tonight seemed a problem with the same shoulder. Would make sense to give him a week to recover and bring haynes in

Think it was a head injury tonight for Stokes

georgehudson · Nov 4, 2015

let's cut to the chase, good performances by most, TM assessed the performance by understanding the trials & tribulations of young footballers,
but importantly, again we've had to put up with a sunday league standard referee
RCC 6
AP 7
SR 7
AM 6
CS 7
RV 7
JF 8
JOB 7
RK 7
JC 7
AA 8
subs all 6
& Michael Bull (shit) 0 & his dire cohorts 1

ptr · Nov 4, 2015

Why are some people giving Phillips such a low rating. Yes he took a few mins getting into it but the run and cross for Armstrong goal is worth at least a 6 itself. He is starting to play like he used to when first breaking into the side. Bombing up the wing and making some fantastic challenges. Also wins a fair amount of headers for his size. Wears his heart on his sleeve and really don't understand the stick he gets. The penalty was unlucky. The stick he gets from the crowd is shite tbh. I also thought he kept possession a lot better tonight and he seems to be growing in confidence.

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Nov 4, 2015

ptr said:
Why are some people giving Phillips such a low rating. Yes he took a few mins getting into it but the run and cross for Armstrong goal is worth at least a 6 itself. He is starting to play like he used to when first breaking into the side. Bombing up the wing and making some fantastic challenges. Also wins a fair amount of headers for his size. Wears his heart on his sleeve and really don't understand the stick he gets. The penalty was unlucky. The stick he gets from the crowd is shite tbh. I also thought he kept possession a lot better tonight and he seems to be growing in confidence.

I had him on a 6/7 but the handball brings him down to a 4, appalling from him after conceding a penalty the other week for almost exactly the same thing. Unforgivable

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Nov 4, 2015

I know we all agree that RCC had a few heart in mouth moments but that save from the long throw was top class.

Otis · Nov 4, 2015

sperrin07 said:
charles cook 5 - thought he was dodgy tonight, dropped a couple of balls and was making me nervous.

Phillips 6 - yet another penalty, was ok defensively but good assist

Ricketts 6 - is better at right back, was unlucky with their 2nd as he was fouled and it was handball

Martin 6 - was ok

Stokes 5 - won a few headers but didnt do much. Worked hard

Fleck 6 - nowhere near as good as saturday, too late releasing the ball but great ball to phillips for 2nd

Vincelot 6 - good booking in 96th min needs a rest saturday

Kent 7 - marked up slightly for getting his first goal, didnt do much else

Cole 6 - beckham esc free kick but didnt set the game alight. Few clever ideas that his feet struggled to execute

O'brien 7 - worked hard as usual, brilliant flick for 3rd goal

Armstrong 9 - 2 great finishes, constant threat, good pressure of defensive line

Murphy 6 - some good runs nearly scored

Lameiras 5 - ineffective

Tudgay 6 - didnt do much, deserves a chance saturday in Armstrongs absense.

Team for sat:
Burge
Phillips
Martin
Ricketts
Haynes
Fleck
Thomas
Murphy
Cole (if available)
Lameiras
Tudgay

Charles Cook
Stokes
Harries
Obrien
Fortune
Alliyu
Finch?

Apart from one wayward pass, I thought Vincelot was superb. He broke up play, should some lovely trickery, kept the ball moving and showed some real guile too.

I would give him an 8 or 9 apart from the fact that the whole team sort of capitualted a bit in the second half. Definitely worthy of a 7 though surely?

.

stevefloyd · Nov 4, 2015

I would love to have been there to rate them but seeing as I wasn't and 6,500 miles away I won't berate them also ...another 3 wonderful points to the tally

speedie87 · Nov 4, 2015

Rcc 5
Phillips 5
Stokes 6
Martin 6
Ricketts 6
Fleck 6
Vincelot 6
Kent 6
Cole 5
O'brien 6
Armstrong 9

Lamerias 3
Tudgay 4
Murphy 6

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Nov 4, 2015

Rcc 5
Phillips 5
Stokes 6
Martin 6
Ricketts 5
Fleck 6
Vincelot 7
Kent 6
Cole 5
O'brien 6
Armstrong 8

Lamerias 4
Tudgay 4
Murphy 6

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 4, 2015

I_Saw_Shaw_Score said:
Rcc 5
Phillips 5
Stokes 6
Martin 6
Ricketts 5
Fleck 6
Vincelot 7
Kent 6
Cole 5
O'brien 6
Armstrong 8

Lamerias 4
Tudgay 4
Murphy 6

Other than tudgay 5 I agree

Otis · Nov 4, 2015

I_Saw_Shaw_Score said:
Rcc 5
Phillips 5
Stokes 6
Martin 6
Ricketts 5
Fleck 6
Vincelot 7
Kent 6
Cole 5
O'brien 6
Armstrong 8

Lamerias 4
Tudgay 4
Murphy 6

RCC 5
Philips 5
Stokes 6
Martin 6
Ricketts 7
Fleck 6
Vincelot 7.5
Kent 6
Cole 5
O'Brien 7
Armstrong 8

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 4, 2015

That interests me Otis. I normally share your opinion on games so I have thought Martin has been more solid than Ricketts these last two games but you have given him a higher marking. What am u seeing or not seeing that I am do you think?

Otis · Nov 4, 2015

Sky Blue Pete said:
That interests me Otis. I normally share your opinion on games so I have thought Martin has been more solid than Ricketts these last two games but you have given him a higher marking. What am u seeing or not seeing that I am do you think?

I thought Ricketts looked a lot more assured and also on two occasions was very much an attacking threat too. He made one fantastic run all the way from his own half right to the edge of the opposition's box.

Sky Blue Pete · Nov 4, 2015

The attacking runs yep! Good point

Ratings (1 Viewer)

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency