David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Exactly, I've ignored him after that.
I wasn't chipping away. You said the bloke was black and it was a black bloke attacking white blokes.
Yes, you're a cowardYes, great answer. You want to fight about it.
Says much more about you than it does about me.
Sorry, it was a dark brown bloke attacking slightly off cream people (this is a joke) That wasn't my point, you're poisonous. My point was how race vs race is published in the press. That's all.I wasn't chipping away. You said the bloke was black and it was a black bloke attacking white blokes.
Happy to chat. Always.I'm not threatening violence. Just a chat face to face
If you are going to put someone on ignore, just ignore them. This ignore and wind up routine is toxic and stinking this place out.In case Greggs tries to lie about what he has said
View attachment 15587
Cheers pal. He's making my piss boilIf you are going to put someone on ignore, just ignore them. This ignore and wind up routine is toxic and stinking this place out.
If you are going to put someone on ignore, just ignore them. This ignore and wind up routine is toxic and stinking this place out.
I worry that these days we so much jumping to conclusions and it can be dangerous.
I think that all people were saying yesterday was to wait for the facts.
The Broadgate thing showed us that. The reports on the internet were widely way off the mark.
Exactly, people need to grow the fuck up.If you are going to put someone on ignore, just ignore them. This ignore and wind up routine is toxic and stinking this place out.
Not true.To be fair you’d discounted the fact it was a terrorist attack when it was pretty clear it was from the beginning
Always the same scenario, known to MI5, history of crimes, etc. For scum like this, we should have tiny cells, living on bread and water, no exercise, no communication to the outside world, make the next 40 years hell, then execute him. We've taken him in (wrongly imo, but everyone knows my views on that) and he turns around and thanks us like this, we should have a one strike and your out policy for all immigrants.
I take it we just don't have the resources to track and keep an eye on everyone on any watchlist.A fundamental failure on policy here by those responsible.
No we don’t - and we’ve been stripping the whole system of resources for years.I take it we just don't have the resources to track and keep an eye on everyone on any watchlist.
I take it we just don't have the resources to track and keep an eye on everyone on any watchlist.
Not true.
I thought in my mind it was probably terrorist related, but police then made a statement that they didn't believe it to be terrorist related at that stage.
At that point I was every much let's wait and see.
Entirely sensible.
No we don’t - and we’ve been stripping the whole system of resources for years.
Of course this makes me a lefty radical football hating bisexual.BBC says:
Police say the multiple stabbing is “not currently being treated as a terrorism incident".
Det Ch Supt Ian Hunter said: "However, officers are keeping an open mind as to the motivation for the incident and are being supported by colleagues from Counter Terrorism Policing South East."
My understanding is, Nick, that on Saturday night it was said to be terror related. I didn't see that at all. I only picked up on the story Sunday morning and there the statement from the police was that they didn't believe it to be teror related.Did they actually rule it out? I still haven't seen where they said this.
It was said within a couple of hours it was terror related, I posted a screenshot.
We’ve probably already removed the funding for the van driver and sold the van...Much easier to just bundle them into a van and get rid of them.
Of course this makes me a lefty radical football hating bisexual.
It was reported as:Wasn't that just one article from the BBC though? It was the BBC saying it wasn't, rather than the policeman.
I mean, counter terror police were raiding his flat that night which was also being reported.
Pretty obvious it was and as it turns out, it was....
“This is not currently being treated as a terrorism incident, however officers are keeping an open mind as to the motivation for the incident and are being supported by colleagues from Counter Terrorism Policing South East.Wasn't that just one article from the BBC though? It was the BBC saying it wasn't, rather than the policeman.
I mean, counter terror police were raiding his flat that night which was also being reported.
Pretty obvious it was and as it turns out, it was....
A fundamental failure on policy here by those responsible.
Matt Hancock even said it wasn't being investigated as terrorist, moments before it was. It appears however, that to point that out makes one uber political, reek of tie-dye, and have a massive beard and smoke a pipe.
That was more aimed at the likes of DOD who want to make every single thread about their politics bullshit. Lefty this, righty that, gammon this and that. "Oh I have so and so blocked but I read what they say anyway".
Note to editors: There will be no further updates tonight. From the same Police article.It was reported not long after 10 it was a terror incident? 10.40 I think it was.
I agree - there are an estimated 40,000 suspected people like this guy - we really should look long and hard at our asylum system - anyone on this list should be made available to the public and any non uk citizens on it sent packing tomorrow
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?