Miller strikes me as a better version of Nouble, wouldn't fancy him as our first choice striker to bang in 20 goals but as our plan B to ring off the bench then sure
Problem is we will have Thomas and Tudguy, the likelihood is we're only going to be bringing 2 strikers in, therefore we need to be looking at better than the likes of Miller. We've got to stop signing players who's careers are on the decline just because we've heard of them.Miller strikes me as a better version of Nouble, wouldn't fancy him as our first choice striker to bang in 20 goals but as our plan B to ring off the bench then sure
If he's only plan b he's hardly going to play and therefore likely to score no more than MAF or Tudguy.I agree, I thought Miller could be used as a Plan B and a Plan B only. No chance would i want him starting every game by any means but the guy is 6"4 and an obvious presence in the oppositions box. He's also never played in League One which makes me think that he could bag the odd goal if given the opportunity
Tudgay for the experience, Thomas for development, youth and energy, Miller as our something different off the bench and then one more signing to be our first choice striker. Could be worse.Problem is we will have Thomas and Tudguy, the likelihood is we're only going to be bringing 2 strikers in, therefore we need to be looking at better than the likes of Miller. We've got to stop signing players who's careers are on the decline just because we've heard of them.
If he's only plan b he's hardly going to play and therefore likely to score no more than MAF or Tudguy.
Tudgay for the experience, Thomas for development, youth and energy, Miller as our something different off the bench and then one more signing to be our first choice striker. Could be worse.
So what we should just stick with having no plan B then because they won't be starting? Doesn't that go against what people have been crying about for the last 3 months?
No, never said we shouldn't have a plan b have I? Just that there must be better options out there, preferably one that has a half decent goal record, not a striker that's 29 and not yet hit 50 first team goals yet and not someone who's career is in the decline because we've heard of him. If it was someone like Hansen from Bradford who's proven and knows this league and has a goal and assists in him I'd be all for signing him.
How do you know it could be worse? we haven't signed him so its a mute point anyway.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Agree with he is more effective but you don't bring in Clarke as your plan B which is what I said about Miller, I wouldn't mind Miller as our back up option to bring something different off the bench.Leon Clarke would be cheaper and more effective in this league that Miller
Agree with he is more effective but you don't bring in Clarke as your plan B which is what I said about Miller, I wouldn't mind Miller as our back up option to bring something different off the bench.
If we signed Clarke he would be the main striker and goalscorer who we build the team around.
Miller could be the next McGoldrick - who knows!
Obviously we wouldn't, I'm not so sure Miller would cost more than Clarke.but why bring in a plan B for more money than we could sign a Plan A striker for ?
As Steven Pressley spotted, Rory Donnelly is a good prospect. 10 in 38 for Gillingham. Shame Swansea sacked their manager on day one of his loan. Fair play to him for doing a u turn so he could try and prove himself to the new manager.
Leon Clarke would be cheaper and more effective in this league that Miller
Problem is we will have Thomas and Tudguy, the likelihood is we're only going to be bringing 2 strikers in, therefore we need to be looking at better than the likes of Miller. We've got to stop signing players who's careers are on the decline just because we've heard of them.
If he's only plan b he's hardly going to play and therefore likely to score no more than MAF or Tudguy.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Cheaper? Do you really think so? Firstly we would have to pay a fee for Clarke and then match or possibly increase the wage that he gets paid by Bury which cannot be lower than 4K a week considering it is unlikely he would've taken a massive drop from his Wolves wage. Miller is a free agent and will have no choice but to reduce whatever he was on at huddersfield due to the fact that it simply has not worked out for him at championship level and will have to seek out league one clubs. Don't doubt whatsoever Clarke would be more effective though.
hmm, well for a start, it might not just be league one clubs
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...merges-transfer-target-Turkish-Sivasspor.html
Also, as you said its unlikely Clarke has taken a reduction in Wolves wages to go to league one, why would Miller ?
Tammy and jodi? In the same team?
Kaikai was on loan at Shrewsbury
Why would Murphy go? He's one of the one's likely to be on an okay wage for the Championship.Rumours doing the rounds on twitter of an impending fire sale at Norwich due to financial problems. Probably bollocks as its twitter but if true worth a cheeky bid for Murphy?
Live 20 miles from Norwich and have several mates who are season ticket holders, prettyHow the hell have Norwich got money problem. Two of the last three years in the Prem with parachute payments rolled in for the next few years.They have hardly spent on the stadium or infrastructure to my knowledge, so unless they have totally overpaid on wages which I'm sure Delia wouldn't let happen I can't believe they are struggling
They must have the worst chief accountant going if they do have financial woes.
Can't see it myself
Pressley, and Eaves is awful.Was it elvis. Or Tm who was once interested in Tom eaves?
Tommy Rowe is a good league one player out of contract at Wolves as well, scored against us yesterday for Doncaster who he is one loan at. Don't think those two strikers you mentioned are good enough.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?