shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Providing cover and options I think. You could play Dasilva, O’Hare, or Palmer in a pinch but it’s not ideal (and O’Hare is off in Jan and Palmer is made of glass)
Www.onlyfans.com
Left sided forward seems to be Wright's place now. Are we replacing him or just providing competition?
Earner?!? Please elaborate.
I sell used bed sheets, I market them as shit tie dye.Earner?!? Please elaborate.
Niche. Let me know if you're looking to set up a franchise north of the border; I reckon I could do quite well.I sell used bed sheets, I market them as shit tie dye.
Niche. Let me know if you're looking to set up a franchise north of the border; I reckon I could do quite well.
Did you stop for added time?Feel sorry for the people sat around me yesterday, I was leaking gas for 90 mins solid.
still couldn’t hit a barn door with a banjo.
Find it interesting that MR spoke about the famous gelling period last night. Results have suddenly improved despite changing system to 4 at the back and using wingers for the first time in years.We beat a hapless Birmingham team and our double digit million strike force still couldn’t hit a barn door with a banjo.
Ironically, the cheaper signings are doing better.
Blah blah “time to adjust” blah blah “Haji can put his own boots on”.
Hope our strikers improve if we’ve any chance on anything. That’s the 20 game view.
Do you not agree with the manager that some teams need time to get it right ?Find it interesting that MR spoke about the famous gelling period last night. Results have suddenly improved despite changing system to 4 at the back and using wingers for the first time in years.
I do. But we made a pretty significant tactical change midway through a game and looked better almost immediately, have done since. Seems more that we've chosen to play to people's strengths rather than shoehorning them into something that wasn't working.Do you not agree with the manager that some teams need time to get it right ?
I do. But we made a pretty significant tactical change midway through a game and looked better almost immediately, have done since. Seems more that we've chosen to play to people's strengths rather than shoehorning them into something that wasn't working.
That and Collins/Kitching/Thomas have already played together for a full season.
Point being that if it was about gelling to that extent, changing the system that much would in theory make performances more disjointed...it did the oppositeWell we had to play matches to find out that a system we played for 6 years suddenly wasnt working .. a manager reluctant to change something that's not failed him in years .. but even in most of the last 5 matches we weren't seeing quick intricate moves that we seen last night .. fact is several players are improving as the season moves
Point being that if it was about gelling to that extent, changing the system that much would in theory make performances more disjointed...it did the opposite
Off where ?Providing cover and options I think. You could play Dasilva, O’Hare, or Palmer in a pinch but it’s not ideal (and O’Hare is off in Jan and Palmer is made of glass)
Www.onlyfans.com
Alternatively, the fact we didn't do it earlier is because we'd been working on it in training to get it right.Point being that if it was about gelling to that extent, changing the system that much would in theory make performances more disjointed...it did the opposite
We don't play with wingersFind it interesting that MR spoke about the famous gelling period last night. Results have suddenly improved despite changing system to 4 at the back and using wingers for the first time in years.
We certainly did last night…?We don't play with wingers
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Never mindPlayers can still be gelling even when they're losing .. we created many chances and should have won a good portion of the games even In a wingback system .
.. Still not sure what point is being made besides moaning for no apparent reason
4231 , players can act as wingers but generally they are wide attacking midfieldersWe certainly did last night…?
Which is clearly different from playing a single attacking midfielder centrally behind two forwards, or a central box midfield.4231 , players can act as wingers but generally they are wide attacking midfielders
Which is clearly different from playing a single attacking midfielder centrally behind two forwards, or a central box midfield.
We don't play with wingers
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Simms and wright will come goodWe need some experience and someone to lead the side and higher quality in forward positions.
We didn’t play 4231 last night.4231 , players can act as wingers but generally they are wide attacking midfielders
We definitely played 4231 , at no point did we play 4141We didn’t play 4231 last night.
I would characterise it as 4123 or 4141.
Sakamoto is playing as a fairly traditional winger IMO with Wright in more of an inside forward role.
We've played 4-2-3-1 several times. People kept disputing it, despite the clear evidence.
What a load of shit. 'Traditional' wingers were purely attackers, Sakamoto regularly gets back and defends properly.We didn’t play 4231 last night.
I would characterise it as 4123 or 4141.
Sakamoto is playing as a fairly traditional winger IMO with Wright in more of an inside forward role.
Sorry, what does one still image prove?Not being argumentative I just didn't see what you saw , we defended compact in a 4231 as shown here very clearly View attachment 32760
That image shows clearly an attacking midfield 3 and a striker , allen playing slightly ahead of Sheaf in the 2 and our fullbacks getting highSorry, what does one still image prove?
We’re arguing semantics here really.
Allen was definitely playing further forward than Sheaf.
The only surprising thing about that image is that bidwell gets more forward than van ewijkIt's 4231 clear as day, I don't know why people can't see it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?