I will suggest a correction if I may, You're just replacing 1 clueless ref with anotherSaid in the other thread, I think it should be up to the ref to have a look at a replay if he wants. I think the whole idea of VAR undermines refs authority and you’re just replacing one fallible ref with another. May as well stick with the one you’ve got.
The intention is less pressure and more surgical response to the decision leads to a better decision or more accurateI will suggest a correction if I may, You're just replacing 1 clueless ref with another
Goal looked offside?
Both refs were dog shit.
Although he didn't give them a clear penalty either.
For some reason didn't want to book their players and let them get away with it.
Like today?I will suggest a correction if I may, You're just replacing 1 clueless ref with another
Absolutely, it's a shame his timepiece stopped during timewastingLike today?
When will we be that team?Procession time!
They got the points the media and everyone else were after, inevitable really!!
Nah, it's only a fucking toenail off, isn't it???????????????????????
It's a conspiracy, make the officials so completely dreadful that there will be less resistance to VAR. They have been awful this season.The officials were very poor all round I thought. Thomas 100% gave away a penalty, a pretty clear offside goal, loads of fouls not given and loads of non fouls given.
Par for the course really.
Two minutes added in the first half. I was expecting six.
Didn't fit the expectation did it?Yeah it was very weird. Should have been much more.
Yeah it was very weird. Should have been much more.
I have never seen timewasting taking corners before. Very early on in the game and so blatant. Ref does…………………nothing.Yeah it was very weird. Should have been much more.
Ball can't have been in play for more than about 3mins total during the 11+ added time.And at least 2-3 added onto the 11 mins second half as they continually wasted time during injury time. That being said, I was ready to go by then anyway
I’ve said it before but why has the directive to correctly add stoppage time just fallen away? Second time in three years they’ve tried to implement and refs just give up on it by ChristmasBall can't have been in play for more than about 3mins total during the 11+ added time.
I don't even blame Ipswich, yeah they milked it to the absolute maximum, but once it was obvious very early on that neither ref had any intention of punishing it why not?
Just to add to this, cast your minds back to the first two game weeks this season. No time wasting as players knew it would be added on and punished. 9 minutes average added time I think it was, features on MotD and other shows about how much more time the ball was in play compared to previous seasons. Then present day it’s a shambles again.I’ve said it before but why has the directive to correctly add stoppage time just fallen away? Second time in three years they’ve tried to implement and refs just give up on it by Christmas
The intention is less pressure and more surgical response to the decision leads to a better decision or more accurate
So is the ref responsible for that garbage performance?Pathetic again.
Bidwells challenge redSo is the ref responsible for that garbage performance?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?