It was meant to be pusbccfc, it was just a joke
Nailed on penalty coming for QPR on Saturday thenWell, all those who clamour for accountability...
Guess who this guy is now refereeing instead?
View attachment 28997
Refs already have the power to do that100% agree with this. I'd also have a third man in rule. One player from each side can talk to the ref about any incident but if a third person starts moaning straight in the book
All this sort of shit could be stamped out pretty easily if they wanted to do something about it
There's a lot in the current rules that could be used to clamp down on things like diving and descent but there seems no will to do itRefs already have the power to do that
You've really got a thing about players falling over haven't you.There's a lot in the current rules that could be used to clamp down on things like diving and descent but there seems no will to do it
Then they act shocked when there's a situation with the one like the linesman last weekend
I’m pretty sure diving and descent are exactly the same thingThere's a lot in the current rules that could be used to clamp down on things like diving and descent but there seems no will to do it
Then they act shocked when there's a situation with the one like the linesman last weekend
Which lino? I can't remember any of them being praised.Another interesting Guardian article on referees. It was the lino in our Watford game first match for 2 years due to Covid!
‘We’re always easy to have a go at’: behind the scenes at a PGMOL referee training camp
St George’s Park visit shows lengths officials go to in pursuit of right decisions and how they deal with things going wrongwww.theguardian.com
The ginger one. Think it was the Fadz/pen oneWhich lino? I can't remember any of them being praised.
If it's the lino who got mcfadz booked and missed the penalty then surely they are just trolling?
The ginger one. Think it was the Fadz/pen one
It was a great decision. I was fuming watching it live. Even after it went in I was waiting for the callI may have misread it the praise was for the decision against Stoke that the was onside
Same my lad called itIt was a great decision. I was fuming watching it live. Even after it went in I was waiting for the call
So it was his fault?Same my lad called it
Awful decision but we take and move on
Their player should have been off. No doubt.First one he gave us all night. The tackle on Hamer and the assault on Panzo was a disgrace.
No yellow for that was obsceneFirst one he gave us all night. The tackle on Hamer and the assault on Panzo was a disgrace.
100% he was already booked, should definitely have goneNo idea how he only added on 5 mins. That was insane. It was so much more. Clearly.
He would have looked like a complete fool had their been VAR on the Panzo challenge, because he actually gave a free kick to them at first. He had to reverse that after talking to the linesman, but then would have had to have sent their player off too would'nt he?
It would have only been VAR reviewed for a straight red card which it probably wasn't so he'd still have escaped the sending off.No idea how he only added on 5 mins. That was insane. It was so much more. Clearly.
He would have looked like a complete fool had their been VAR on the Panzo challenge, because he actually gave a free kick to them at first. He had to reverse that after talking to the linesman, but then would have had to have sent their player off too would'nt he?
No idea how he only added on 5 mins. That was insane. It was so much more. Clearly.
He would have looked like a complete fool had their been VAR on the Panzo challenge, because he actually gave a free kick to them at first. He had to reverse that after talking to the linesman, but then would have had to have sent their player off too would'nt he?
Look at panzo fouling him there
It’s just basic decision making for a referee, according to the FA guidelines - THAT is a high foot, and therefore dangerous play: he should have had a straight red, let alone a second yellow.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?