dancers lance
Well-Known Member
She should be here already, It's a disgrace.
She should be here already, It's a disgrace.Give her asylum. It's the right thing to do.
Maybe you just bored him so much he had little choice but to block you MartJust insults people. I have started insulting him back, but he just ran away and blocked me like a little kid. I think he’s not such a man as you seem to think..
Maybe you just bored him so much he had little choice but to block you Mart
Good call............I shall reply no more to him.Many ignore Mart. If this is aimed at me then I genuinely have pulled away as I consider his mental state fragile.
He is a paranoid obsessive and the closer we get to to the perceived exit his fragility will increase. His arguments are increasingly delusional and exhibit classic signs of paranoia.
I argued against his views recently with real zeal and backed him into a corner. I felt uncomfortable with this afterwards as his responses became more and more absurd.
I’m not wummimg - he has significant issues - we all should leave him be.
Many ignore Mart. If this is aimed at me then I genuinely have pulled away as I consider his mental state fragile.
He is a paranoid obsessive and the closer we get to to the perceived exit his fragility will increase. His arguments are increasingly delusional and exhibit classic signs of paranoia.
I argued against his views recently with real zeal and backed him into a corner. I felt uncomfortable with this afterwards as his responses became more and more absurd.
I’m not wummimg - he has significant issues - we all should leave him be.
Good call............I shall reply no more to him.
Good call............I shall reply no more to him.
In Oldham the council has commissioned counselling for those involved. How on earth does biology come 2nd to a made up fantasy?Nobody really wants to talk about the inbreeding issue and how regressive it is. It's no wonder they're too dim to see reason.
Inbreeding in Islam: Over 70% Of Muslims Are The Product of Incest — Steemit
Its not just a few bad eggs though Otis. Just in this instance, it's an entire community trying to kill somebody for believing in a different sky fairy.
Sent from my SM-J510FN using Tapatalk
So, is Islam 4-4-2, or 5-3-2 with wingbacks?Actually, it's the same Sky Fairy. Just semantics over what you believe about particular Sky Fairy.
Think of it like on here. We all support Cov but some people want us to play 4-4-2, others 4-2-3-1.
The you get into stuff like sectarianism, which is agreeing on a formation but one person what a particular player to play on the wing whilst another wants someone else.
Then you get really stupid stuff where you agree on formation, players etc but one wants the team to play in the long sleeves and another in short sleeves.
It's like we've gone back 500 years in time isn't it.
There is just no place and no excuse for this kind of thinking in the 21st century.
I have known a number of Muslims closely over the years and they have all been nice people, but there clearly is a massive problem with so many within the religion.
It's clear as day that unless they allow this woman to seek refuge outside of Pakistan they have signed her death warrant.
It's no wonder I think religion is a load of bollocks when I come across this kind of thinking.
And if this thinking did actually ever prove to be true, then God is a very, very horrible, spiteful, nasty and hateful individual.
So, is Islam 4-4-2, or 5-3-2 with wingbacks?
Y
1) A baker in N.Ireland refuses to bake a gay cake because of his religious views and the whole country is in uproar! "How dare he have beliefs and stand by them!? Let name and shame the company and boycott it until he loses everything! It's disgusting he has a belief"!
Surely Jesus up front for the crosses.Actually, it's the same Sky Fairy. Just semantics over what you believe about particular Sky Fairy.
Think of it like on here. We all support Cov but some people want us to play 4-4-2, others 4-2-3-1.
The you get into stuff like sectarianism, which is agreeing on a formation but one person what a particular player to play on the wing whilst another wants someone else.
Then you get really stupid stuff where you agree on formation, players etc but one wants the team to play in the long sleeves and another in short sleeves.
"if a person walked into a cake shop asking for a cake protesting gay marriage but the owner disagreed with that sentiment, should the owner of the shop have the right to refuse the order or should they have been forced to make the cake?"
If you switch the positions you do wonder if those outraged would feel the same or if they'd be applauding them for their principles?
For the record, I disagree with the baker on their attitude toward homosexuality
"if a person walked into a cake shop asking for a cake protesting gay marriage but the owner disagreed with that sentiment, should the owner of the shop have the right to refuse the order or should they have been forced to make the cake?"
If you switch the positions you do wonder if those outraged would feel the same or if they'd be applauding them for their principles?
For the record, I disagree with the baker on their attitude toward homosexuality
Why should a Christian that doesn't believe in gay marriage make a cake that flies in the face of his belief? They didn't refuse service because the customer was gay, anyone ordering that cake would have been refused so it wasn't a case of discrimination. As correctly ruled in the supreme court.
This whole charade was just the usual over dramatised "plight" of the lgbt community where political correctness is used as a weapon to destroy anyone who doesn't hold their beliefs. The case cost the tax payer £250,000!
I personally don't give two rats bollocks who marries who but I side with the bakers purely on the grounds of freedom of speech and expression.
It’s nothing to do with attitude to homosexuality
Well, it was really..... it wasn't their opinion on Victoria sponges that was the issue was it?
OK, to be pedantic it was their opinion towards gay marriage specifically but I think their attitude towards homosexuality isn't exactly liberal, more grudging acceptance. If we were to propose criminalisation of homosexuality again I hardly think they'd be at the front of the queue for placards defending it.
No it was about freedom of expression and the right to choose
Give her asylum. It's the right thing to do.
Erm.......every Pakistani that has been on death row in prison for 8 years, for alleged blasphemy you mean?What's to stop every Pakistani claiming to be a Christian just to gain entry into the UK?
How is that Britain's problem?Erm.......every Pakistani that has been on death row in prison for 8 years, for alleged blasphemy you mean?
How is that all the other countries between here and Pakistan's problem?How is that Britain's problem?
Why should she be invited here as opposed to say all the other countries between here and Pakistan?
And worse murdering those who didn’t belief things in exactly the same wayGiven the poor state of many areas of the world and the lack of education (often deliberate so that those in power can't be questioned) it's hardly surprising many hold such extreme views. When you're told that this is the truth and not even given alternatives or the knowledge to question it then that's what happens. If you've spent you're life being force fed this stuff, having to pray 4 times a day etc and someone comes along and tells you it's a load of nonsense, you're going to find it hard to accept.
When Britain was at a similar stage of development Christianity was hate filled and violent and thought nothing of killing those who were non-believers. It's only very recently that some of that rhetoric has been fixed regarding things like homosexuality and we still have sectarian violence going on.
I didn't say it was. My point was that a refugee should seek refuge in the nearest safe country, not one that is 4,000 miles away and crosses many national borders.How is that all the other countries between here and Pakistan's problem?
And which is the nearest safest country then?I didn't say it was. My point was that a refugee should seek refuge in the nearest safe country, not one that is 4,000 miles away and crosses many national borders.
I have no idea but I'm pretty sure it's not the UK. Have you tried looking at a map?And which is the nearest safest country then?
No. Was hoping you were going to do it for me.I have no idea but I'm pretty sure it's not the UK. Have you tried looking at a map?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?