skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Ha ha. Someone else has compared you to Gareth from the office that's funny.
It was JLR that was mentioned so go on then humour me - who would open it and how?
As for Gareth from the office - yet another line you have "borrowed" from another poster.
Also not addressing the other point - JLR and pretty much any other sponsor wouldn't touch it without the club there.
Illegal. I'm not talking about a zoo here !!!
...... Oh hold on. Don't forget a zoo was my idea.
Ha ha. Someone else has compared you to Gareth from the office that's funny.
When we all talk about the Ricoh and the Telegraph says it, then there seems plenty of mention yes, but unfortunately that's mainly localised as compared to say several mentions during an afternoon on Gillette Soccer Saturday for example? There because of a football club, the name gets mentioned to a potential 16m audience over and over. If the club score a goal or concede a goal yet another live mention from the ground. It goes without saying that if the football club are not in place then the reason to sponsor is almost zero and therefore worthless to ACL. Once again they need the football club.
I'm watching the ATP tennis from Rome and last week from Madrid and all I saw constantly was Ricoh! Hardly think they care about sponsoring our stadium unless there is a football club in place. Perhaps the one thing they do have is thousands see it from the M6 but that's hardly going to help much.
Lol !!
Only about 150,000 vehicles pass it per day. That is some serious numbers !!!!
Lol !!
Only about 150,000 vehicles pass it per day. That is some serious numbers !!!!
They could buy a sandwich board and a tractor in a field for less.
...and of those 150k per day how many actually have time to notice? - that's why I say thousands. The TV on the other hand is mind boggling by comparison.
...and of those 150k per day how many actually have time to notice? - that's why I say thousands. The TV on the other hand is mind boggling by comparison.
Whatever it is worth, it is worth less without a Football Team.
what about the snooker that was televised last November?
Whatever it is worth, it is worth less without a Football Team.
Of course it is. I can almost taste the desperation on here from some telling us how successful the Ricoh is even without the club. Despite those clamouring voices and similar positive noises from ALC and CCC, without our football club then the Ricoh will ultimately fail. I notice a distinct lack of stadium acts this summer.
Of course it is. I can almost taste the desperation on here from some telling us how successful the Ricoh is even without the club. Despite those clamouring voices and similar positive noises from ALC and CCC, without our football club then the Ricoh will ultimately fail. I notice a distinct lack of stadium acts this summer.
Probably larger crowds at Sixfields than the audience figures for that on ITV 3 or 4 whichever it was on to be fair.
Of course it is. I can almost taste the desperation on here from some telling us how successful the Ricoh is even without the club. Despite those clamouring voices and similar positive noises from ALC and CCC, without our football club then the Ricoh will ultimately fail. I notice a distinct lack of stadium acts this summer.
To be fair that's obviously not true. In all honesty though, I wonder if the numbers watching the Football League show to the bitter end (when we're normally on) are any higher than the ones watching the snooker on ITV4!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?