Grendel
Well-Known Member
So you concede that ACL's business model is fully dependant on the football club being there?
It could be seen as protecting their business (ACL taking action against NTFC) which would be the directors responsibility, and they'd be negligent if they didn't.
Well, NT's fans are least deserving of being sued. However, David Cardoza?
So you concede that ACL's business model is fully dependant on the football club being there?
What a sorry joke this once proud club has become. They can all feck off as far as I am concerned, had it with the lot of them. Guess its just nostalgia left for me!
never like to see fans dragged into things but Cardoza had plenty of warning it was a bad idea getting involved but thought he'd pocket some easy cash. no sympathy for him at all.
Yes we are a pantomime and a joke. The biggest joke is we will also certainly end up back and the Ricoh and this has all been for nothing.
I think this is a concerted effort to keep SISU from moving the club.
Think about it. They could sue the FL but SISU would still move regardless.
Sue Northampton and you add to the already large worries the police, fans and town already have about this.
Add in a court case and suddenly your turning mild worries into "RED ALERT" warnings.
I wouldn't be suprised if Northampton Town did a youturn and said they wont allow it as long as ACL retract their court case against the club.
This could force SISU to play at the Ricoh or risk losing their league status and being plumetted to the bottom of footballing society!
I think I'm on my own here but feeling sorry for NTFC in this. They got asked a question and said 'Yes'. That (as far as I'm aware) isn't a crime. So they pocket cash out of it...if it was the other way round, we'd expect some cash (ironically for rent).
Unless the NTFC approached the club to say 'hey, come and play at our gaff', then they've done absolutely nothing wrong and I don't get why we're showing such animosity to them, their chairman and their fans.
Another example of embarrassment for all parties involved in this mess. ACL making themselves look as foolish as SISU on this one in my opinion.
WM
Sure he's a smarmy cock, but still he has no responsibility to us and so is doing whats best for his club, I don't like it but I don't think he or they is anywhere near on the level of SISU or the Football league in terms of the moral crimes they have committed.
So you concede that ACL's business model is fully dependant on the football club being there?
Suing Northampton Town could be the first step towards targeting the Football League.
I have no sympathy for him either but I do for their fans and so I'm not really keen on it, glad ACL are doing something but there are much more deserving targets
Seems to me that CCFC is a " Cash Cow" after all!!!
So you concede that ACL's business model is fully dependant on the football club being there?
Have never seen anything from ACL officially to say they don't need CCFC.
It's common sense that the whole stadium relies on having a football club there.
It would be nice, but don't see how anyone can sue the FL. They make up their own rules and can change to suit the situation. They have no basis in law, they do not need to comply with any norms and their "rules" will no doubt be seen as "guidelines".
You really couldn't make any of this whole clusterfuck up
I think a lot of things in life, not just football, are similar to what Cardoza has done. Like people on here moaning about City leaving Coventry then in the next breath saying we should move Nuneaton into the Ricoh. I bet Cardoza would be blowing a gasket if the shoe was on the other foot, but because HE and HIS club benefit then suddenly, all is OK.
Correct - they are not breaking any contract.
I pretty sure they are breaking their contract.
The lease is still with CCFC LTD which still exists so therefore the lease still exists too.
By moving to Northampton they are breaking the terms of the lease, therefore allowing ACL to sue Northampton who are willing participants in this breaking of the contract!
The fact CCFC LTD is in administration doesn't mean the lease is broken.
The only way they could break the lease is by liquidating CCFC LTD...
It would be nice, but don't see how anyone can sue the FL. They make up their own rules and can change to suit the situation. They have no basis in law, they do not need to comply with any norms and their "rules" will no doubt be seen as "guidelines".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?