Dealing with sisu? Manhattan group walked away from a ccfc takeover stating the council were unworkable. There as bad as each other.
Obviously not. Manhattan had it sussed and walked. SISU thought they had it sussed and we know the rest.
Dealing with sisu? Manhattan group walked away from a ccfc takeover stating the council were unworkable. There as bad as each other.
Dealing with sisu? Manhattan group walked away from a ccfc takeover stating the council were unworkable. There as bad as each other.
Not seen that reported or mentioned before. One offer was knocked back as the buyer wanted land to develop. Surely as a council that would be welcome? The arena after all was part of a regeneration project. Development usually means new jobs. Of course if the offer was acceptable. Problem is there seems to be a lot of evidence the council were unwilling to relinquish control of the stadium particularly to the football club.
Have any idea what the derisory offer for the freehold was?
I think you have made my point.
You got something that is undocumented/unknown/speculated and then assumed the council were wrong and used it to make a case against the council.
We keep going round in circles and nothing moves on.
'SISU what's the plan ?'
Another thing. You are assuming your position on speculation yet there is a quote from Manhattan stating they were unworkable. Now if Manhattan were telling porkies why did the council not challenge this? As we are aware there quite good at pr. You ask for facts before assuming a position yet want the court case dropped? Which is one way of finding facts out? Is that not contradictory?
Apologies Calista, as you know I was just playing devils advocate with Italia.
Re the percentage issue, I am keeping out of that one, as I know its already caused some debate and i think I am best out of it
We have a lot of CCFC supporting years between us, lets hope in the not too distant future we can turn the corner and actually be rewarded for our support.
I think you have made my point.
You got something that is undocumented/unknown/speculated and then assumed the council were wrong and used it to make a case against the council.
We keep going round in circles and nothing moves on.
'SISU what's the plan ?'
Do you know why the council were unworkable?
Was it anything to do with a derisory offer for the Ricoh freehold ? (Speculation by the way before being quoted )
Again we need the facts before we assume the position.
The council rejected 2 companies one of which wanted to regenerate land as part of a deal - there offer for the stadium was more than they ended up with.
Sisu were lauded as the only bidder the council were interested in as they never wanted the club to own the ground.
The council rejected 2 companies one of which wanted to regenerate land as part of a deal - there offer foru the stadium was more than they ended up with.
Sisu were lauded as the only bidder the council were interested in as they never wanted the club to own the ground.
Remember according to PWKH on this forum Tim Fisher was the best chairman he has ever dealt with at the club. His words not mine.
Do you know why the council were unworkable?
Was it anything to do with a derisory offer for the Ricoh freehold?
One offer was knocked back as the buyer wanted land to develop.
Three more consortiums have shown an interest in buying Coventry City. The Manhattan Group is believed still to be interested along with another American consortium and two UK based consortiums.
Coventry have moved a step closer to a takeover after confirming that an American consortium are in advanced talks to buy the club.
The Manhattan Sports Capital Partners are the bid vehicle for American investors Sean McDevitt and Philip Harris who, along with US-based English investment advisor Roger Marment, have already agreed a deal to buy the Coca-Cola Championship club and take on their estimated debts of £28million.
Talks are being spearheaded by US-based business consultant Gary Hopkins who is a lifelong Sky Blues fan and has been putting the consortium together over the last five months.
A club statement said: “The chairman and board of Coventry City Football Club confirm that non-binding heads of agreement have been signed with Manhattan Capital Sports Partners, a US group led by Gary Hopkins.
“Meanwhile, we have made it clear to the Manhattan group that any new arrangements for the club must involve substantial investment in improving and strengthening the squad to achieve the club’s Premiership ambitions.”
All I know is that the Manhattan Group hastily jumped on a plane and went home
The offer was part of the local football club being taken over so it was in the public domain. Just not the amount on offer. You seem to have an idea. So again how much was it?
Documents and dates ?
Otherwise that means nothing !!
Do you know why the council were unworkable?
Was it anything to do with a derisory offer for the Ricoh freehold ?
Pure guesswork and speculation does not count, surely?
Fletcher and Robinson have both done interviews in the CT where they have both stated that Manhattan pulled out after meeting with the council.
Do you have a link to the full interview Dave? I'd be interested in reading it/them.
Do you have a link to the full interview Dave? I'd be interested in reading it/them.
Can someone remember the name of the other group trying to buy the club? The one who wanted to regenerate the land?
The council has hit back saying it fully supports efforts to save the football club but warned it was under no obligation – or pressure from local people – to sell its share in the arena.
Fletcher walked away from the Sky Blues in October 2007 after reaching his wits’ end trying to bring about a buy-out of the club by American consortium Manhattan Sports Capital, which failed, ultimately, because of differences of opinion with the city council about the ownership of the Ricoh Arena.
UTTED Sky Blues former managing director Paul Fletcher has admitted the Coventry City's Operation Premiership project has come off the rails in the wake of resignation.
Fletcher, who was in the middle of spearheading a takeover deal for the club, said he felt like he had had his heart broken as he handed his resignation in today after it was revealed potential American buyers Manhattan Sports Capital flew in to discuss a deal this week but left almost straight away without even meeting him.
Fletcher says their reason for leaving so quickly was that Coventry City Council and the Higgs charity frightened them out of a deal with the price they were asking for their share of the Ricoh Arena.
The new stadium has been a consistent stumbling block for any takeover deal, which has appeared increasingly vital to the club's financial future since it was revealed it is losing around £90,000 a week minimum by not being able to take most of the profits the ground makes.
The council and the Higgs trust own the shares to the ground and have so far shown they are not willing to sell to any investors unless the price is right to benefit the city as a whole, while investors are only interesting in buying the club if the Ricoh comes with it.
But Fletcher admitted any takeover now looks extremely unlikely in the current climate despite 'four or five potential investors' coming forward to express an interest.
Fletcher, speaking to the Coventry Observer, said: "I've always been open and told the fans the truth and this has really broken my heart. The truth is as far as the takeover is concerned we are no nearer or further than we were six or seven months ago.
"The Manhattan Group came this week but I never got a chance to meet them. It was then I decided to resign.
"They came over and then just jumped back on the plane home and the reason for that is the Higgs charity could not come to an agreement over the price for their shareholding. It is up to the council and the Higgs charity to represent themselves.
"But I have looked over five, six, seven stadium projects and have never come across a project where the council have been wanting to take cash out of the deal. We know where the bank stands but the council and the Higgs charity seem to want a return but it appears their requests seem to be frightening.'
Managing director at the club for the last 18 months Fletcher, who has been awarded an MBE following his previous work on the Wembley and Reebok Stadium projects, stressed though he was not blaming the council or the Higgs charity for the breakdown in takeover talks.
July 18: Paul Fletcher flies to New York to meet with the Manhattan team. Claims deal is still progressing.
July 31: Paul Fletcher admits deal with Manhattan is hanging in the balance and calls on Coventry City Council to save the floundering takeover. He believes they are asking too much for their share of the Ricoh.
August 1: Council hits back at claims it is holding up the bid and says it has received no offers from Manhattan. The Alan Edward Higgs Charity claims the same, and says it has not heard from Manhattan since March.
September 3: Reports appear claiming there are now four bids on the table, one from Manhattan, one from another American company and two from UK investors.
October 1: Sheldon Yellen, owner of a company called Belfer and the man putting up the Manhattan money, flies over for talks at the Ricoh.
October 5: Paul Fletcher quits as MD, claiming all bids have fallen through. Debts are now said to be at pounds 38 million.
October 6: Coventry City Council leader Ken Taylor reveals that two other "derisory" bids have been received, one from Sisu for pounds 15 million and one from Shapiro for pounds 26 million.
October 8: Manhattan confirms it has pulled out.
October 10: Geoffrey Robinson resigns as chairman of the club. He is replaced by Joe Elliott.
October 23: The Football League bans the club from taking on any new players because of the failure to meet payments for an earlier signing.
October 31: Ex-footballer Ray Ranson and Geoffrey Robinson table rival takeover bids.
November 23: Robinson's bid appears to be out of the running, with no further meetings planned.
City council leader Ken Taylor revealed that two other "derisory" bids had been received from two other firms.One, called Sisu, had offered #15million.
The other was from a firm called Shapiro, which offered #26million but wanted the club to pay off its debts and the city council to give it a longer lease on the Ricoh Arena and some spare land to the north of the site.
Mr McGuigan said that deal would have cost the council #4million of taxpayers' money and left the Alan Edward Higgs charity #2.5million out of pocket.
He added: "Even if the bank and Geoffrey [Robinson] accepted they were not going to get a penny back of all the debt [owed to them], and someone bought the club for #1, they'd still have to have lots of money to be able to turn the club around over the next two years."
shapiro and belfer were other names!
If you are that interested why don't you look yourself?
Fletcher has mentioned in numerous times, found a few references to it in the CT
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ws/paul-fletcher-exclusive-iain-dowie-3083185
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/fletcher-why-i-quit-3105888
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/save-the-sky-blues-3110730
Robinson talked about it in an interview with Bob Brolly on CWR, doubt you'll be able to track that down.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/robinson-quits-as-city-chairman-3106030
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ws/sisu-turned-coventry-city-disaster-3043242