clint van damme
Well-Known Member
he didn't have a shot to save in the first game did he?
And if he wasn't in goal first two games we would of lost them for fuck sake striker misses loads of chances keeper makes one mistake it's all his fault
And if he wasn't in goal first two games we would of lost them for fuck sake striker misses loads of chances keeper makes one mistake it's all his fault
That's not my point.
My point is I cannot believe the assembled squad isn't more expensive than the previous 2 opponents' so either;
1. The recruitment was poor
2. Tactics were poor
3. Budgets are less relevant the lower you go
4. The results were not contingent with the season ahead
Agree. Some are missing the obvious. We played badly last two games but still could have been at least two points better off if O'Brien hadn't let two goals in. Early days.Lets face it, we'd be at least 2 points better off if O'Brien wasn't woeful.
Have they dipped into their pockets or just got rid of last years misfits and replaced with lesser wages at a lesser level?Wasn't the whole point of McNulty signing was to play of James Collins? Failed to sign Collins, or even a big powerful striker for him to play off. I don't think Sisu can be blamed for this situation. Players with decent pedigree for our division have been brought in and early, for once they have dipped their hand in their pockets, It just hasn't happened for us after some early promise. This is down to the playing side of things.
Yep, a figure of speech.Anyone think the CT has overblown Robins' comment of 'he should have stayed at home' for the first goal with regards to LOB? I took it as he was just saying that he should have stayed on his line, whereas the CT seems to be making out that he was livid and was basically saying 'that useless twat may as well have not turned up.'
Although both connotations probably accurateAnyone think the CT has overblown Robins' comment of 'he should have stayed at home' for the first goal with regards to LOB? I took it as he was just saying that he should have stayed on his line, whereas the CT seems to be making out that he was livid and was basically saying 'that useless twat may as well have not turned up.'
It never even crossed my mind that Robins might mean anything other than he should have stayed on his line. Unlike the Telegraph to try and whip up a frenzy with a non story.Anyone think the CT has overblown Robins' comment of 'he should have stayed at home' for the first goal with regards to LOB? I took it as he was just saying that he should have stayed on his line, whereas the CT seems to be making out that he was livid and was basically saying 'that useless twat may as well have not turned up.'
How far off is it then?
Yeah. I ONLY read it that way. Why would anyone read it any other way? It's a nonsense.It never even crossed my mind that Robins might mean anything other than he should have stayed on his line. Unlike the Telegraph to try and whip up a frenzy with a non story.
is it not ?
League would show it is in my lifetime
And mine and I am 55..It certainly is in my lifetime.
Anyone think the CT has overblown Robins' comment of 'he should have stayed at home' for the first goal with regards to LOB? I took it as he was just saying that he should have stayed on his line, whereas the CT seems to be making out that he was livid and was basically saying 'that useless twat may as well have not turned up.'
I'm nearly 65
I'm nearly 65
It never even crossed my mind that Robins might mean anything other than he should have stayed on his line. Unlike the Telegraph to try and whip up a frenzy with a non story.
That's how it's meant to be taken isn't it? What I immediately thought anyway!
It was just the CT's social media commments of things like 'Robins is not happy!' that made me think they were trying to make more of it than there actually was. I didn't read that quote and think, 'wow, he's not happy' I just thought he was calmly making a point rather than having a pop at LOB.That's how it's meant to be taken isn't it? What I immediately thought anyway!
Agree. Some are missing the obvious. We played badly last two games but still could have been at least two points better off if O'Brien hadn't let two goals in. Early days.
I thought you were about 95
is the obvious that we lost the last game 0-2, so how is that totally O'Briens fault ?, we didn't score and conceded another with shocking defending.
What sack Robins?Be a great name for a local brewery ale that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?