Running Costs (1 Viewer)

Bennets Afro

Well-Known Member
Losing 80k a week 320k a month and 4 million a year when they took over

Now its 125k a week, 500k, 6million a year

How is this possible with all the cutback and high earners leaving the club?
 

ccfcadz

New Member
LOL I was thinking exactly the same about the figures, what the said at the PC yesterday all contradicted itself:jerkit:
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Presumably because we have arrears and people were threatening us with further action. We also need more income at this time of the year in preparation for the off season when commitments still have to be met but there are vastly reduced income streams.
 

hackneyfox

Well-Known Member
Certainly seems to be the train of thought on GMK.
He wouldn't have handed over his shares for nothing, and why else would you need to borrow 8m with another 5m being needed before the end of the season, allegedly.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
It would have cost nothing unless they 'bought' his shares. His salary was £235k p/a but he had either a 20% stake in the club.
 

CovLis86

Well-Known Member
Again, its just a case of changing story constantly. They cant even decide what the story is between them. Investors arent lining up / we are in very far discussions with several investors. It cant be both.
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
I guess the running costs have gone up cos we are having to fly our band of incompetents from all corners of the globe so they can attend the odd match (wouldn't want them to show any commitment to the club) and the additional cost of electricity to run those tanning beds currently being installed in Rays old office
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top