It could be either.
But you can't claim on one hand that they're incredibly intolerant of terrorists while suggesting with the other hand they intentionally let terrorists kill 130 of their own citizens.
I mean the men who’ve appeared in court rather than ISIS.Yes, ISIS admitted it was them, or to be more precise at no stage denied it was them when they said they will take revenge.
Has it been said this particular building was being targeted then?
They warned that large gatherings such as concerts could be targeted.
Your guy Putin ignored it and said it was a load of rubbish.
...then a large gathering at a concert was targeted.
He’s hardly my guy. It was known that there would be an attack in the US at some point pre 9 11 - it’s revealed in papers that Roosevelt knew Japan would amount an an assault on a US coastal location. So are they culpable?
I don't see how something that happened over 80 years ago is even remotely comparable, but even if it were that's total bollocks as the Pacific commanders were warned an attack could be imminent and they took measures (albeit inadequately).
That's quite obviously totally different to Putin going on television to say the warnings were made up rubbish.
As I say, imagine if Sunak or Biden did that.
Why does that matter?Has there any been any conclusive evidence that they’re actually guilty?
I don’t think 9 11 was that long ago. You do live in a chocolate box world of goodies and baddies.
The US are as guilty - if not more so - of torturing and brutalising people without trial to gain false confessions. No one in the US cares less did they about false imprisonment on an island of innocent people? China - who the west continue to trade with and consider a non threat - brutalise and destroy anyone who opposes the dictatorship.
Our own police force have resorted to brutality to force false confessions.
You really believe in goodies and baddies don’t you?
Thing I find scary is that despite Putin dismissing the warning you can guarantee there'll be a lot of Russians saying"thank God Putin is in charge. He'll defend us."They warned that large gatherings such as concerts could be targeted.
Your guy Putin ignored it and said it was a load of rubbish.
...then a large gathering at a concert was targeted.
The same Boris Johnson who couldn't be arsed to show up to COBRA meetings when he was PM? A man that almost everyone who knows him has said he has no attention span or ability to absorb details. That guy?I can see Russia attacking the UK within a few months. Or Poland. Sunak is absolutely the wrong PM at the moment. Love him or hate him, and i am more the latter, Boris Johnson as PM i truly believe would give Britain a bit more security.
The same Boris Johnson who couldn't be arsed to show up to COBRA meetings when he was PM? A man that almost everyone who knows him has said he has no attention span or ability to absorb details. That guy?
You might see him attacking the UK in the next few months but no one else can.I can see Russia attacking the UK within a few months. Or Poland. Sunak is absolutely the wrong PM at the moment. Love him or hate him, and i am more the latter, Boris Johnson as PM i truly believe would give Britain a bit more security.
He was too busy having "keep - two - metres - apart " sex.The same Boris Johnson who couldn't be arsed to show up to COBRA meetings when he was PM? A man that almost everyone who knows him has said he has no attention span or ability to absorb details. That guy?
I can see Russia attacking the UK within a few months. Or Poland. Sunak is absolutely the wrong PM at the moment. Love him or hate him, and i am more the latter, Boris Johnson as PM i truly believe would give Britain a bit more security.
Two officers from MI5 visited Downing Street in 2020 to brief Boris Johnson on the national security risks of giving Evgeny Lebedev a seat for life in the upper house of Parliament.
The then prime minister argued that the life peerage could go ahead because the MI5 officers’ security concerns were about Evgeny Lebedev’s father Alexander, a KGB-officer-turned-oligarch who has since been sanctioned by Canada and Ukraine for supporting Vladimir Putin’s war.
As the first case of a prime minister dismissing national security advice to make an appointment to the House of Lords, Evgeny Lebedev’s peerage has led to accusations of patronage, cronyism, and calls to reform the upper chamber. The case also represents Boris Johnson’s unserious approach to national security during his premiership, according to one of his former senior national security advisers in Downing Street.
Isn't that Lati's party trick?He was too busy having "keep - two - metres - apart " sex.
Or die of thirst in a wet-room.Given what happened with Navalny wi t be long before all four of these trip up , break their necks getting into a vehicle
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?