idm1975
Well-Known Member
You so funny grendel
You so funny grendelSo would you drop stokes for him then when we get a centre half?
You so funny grendel
I would play stokes, its an obvious answer. What point are you trying to make?Well that's the question isn't it? Would you stick with Stokes or play Haynes?
As soon as we get Martin back, or bring another central defender in, Stokes has to go back to left back.
He's been solid as a rock there. Can't see how we can justify Haynes as the starting left back on the back of a couple of decent games.
If haber is that Canadian geezer your right.Of course we can't, but he has proved to be excellent cover in an emergency situation, as has Stokes moving to CB, a steady revelation.
I think it was Haber who made a nuisance of himself at the Ricoh V Reda but he didn't get a look in today
I quite like the look of Haynes, but he is a little fragile and I think we need more physicality going forwards.Of course we can't, but he has proved to be excellent cover in an emergency situation, as has Stokes moving to CB, a steady revelation.
I think it was Haber who made a nuisance of himself at the Ricoh V Reda but he didn't get a look in today
I would probably go Stokes but there's not much in it. Both more than adequate for a top 6 league 1 team. Think Haynes would get in most league 1 starting 11's
I quite like the look of Haynes, but he is a little fragile and I think we need more physicality going forwards.
I still think he needs work and as soon as we can cover the position I would like to see him get game time on loan somewhere.
So would you drop stokes for him then when we get a centre half?
Too right, we have a squad and at the mo all are stepping up. PUSB XRight to cut the crap starting back four probably if all were fit
...have ruled our reda as injured for season so bye bye!
Willis Ricketts Martin Stokes
Would anyone argue with this???? Great that Haynes and Phillips can cover though
and are getting game time though neither first choice! Glad we are giving the cover
a chance and are responding otherwise what's the point of them being in the squad!
Great Result PUSB!!
I don't like Willis at right back. Very strong and not a lot gets past him and love his physicality, but he offers nothing going forwards and his passing is awful.Right to cut the crap starting back four probably if all were fit
...have ruled our reda as injured for season so bye bye!
Willis Ricketts Martin Stokes
Would anyone argue with this???? Great that Haynes and Phillips can cover though
and are getting game time though neither first choice! Glad we are giving the cover
a chance and are responding otherwise what's the point of them being in the squad!
Great Result PUSB!!
But don't all players up their game when the entire team is confident and winning? It's when the team is under the cosh, that you really find who the good players are.
I don't like Willis at right back. Very strong and not a lot gets past him and love his physicality, but he offers nothing going forwards and his passing is awful.
If Lorentzson is as good as he's supposed to be, I am really hoping he is the answer.
The thought of a Roland Nilsson style, cultured right back, with good passing ability and calmness is a very warming thought.
Obviously need to see him in a City shirt first, but really hoping he proves to be the answer to that position for us.
We just don't like gingers in this neck of the woods.Fair play to the lad..perhaps they are not as harsh on him there like our 'fans' !!
LOL your argument suits you because of a motm today. But your post points to him having great games at ccfc when in fact he has not.Fair play to the lad..perhaps they are not as harsh on him there like our 'fans' !!
We're being relegated you mean?Good player will make it in the same league as CCFC for another club no doubt.
Good player will make it in the same league as CCFC for another club no doubt.
We're being relegated you mean?
He has an awful lot of work to do to be even a League One player, Don.Hopefully not
Lots of players come and go and some managers like fans just don't fancy them.
When to others it's pretty obvious they are good enough. It's just one of those things.
Hernandez at Utd for example they needed a striker he was clearly the man for the job. LGV didn't fancy him. He is proving what half the Utd fan base knew, in the right team with the right style would do a job. Half the Man Utd fans thought it was a mistake. Half agreed with LGV. One if those things. Haynes is not in the same class obviously but he would do alright in league one and one day he will be a decent championship player.
He has an awful lot of work to do to be even a League One player, Don.
He really needs to seriously work at his game if he wants to make a good career out of football.
Hell of a long way to go yet before the Championship beckons, trust me.
How do you come to that conclusion?He's found his level. If we as a club have any aspirations there is no way we should have him back.
It's obvious Mowbray doesn't rate him and rightly so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?