That is a fair point.why the chairman didn't stop Tim as he went way outside the "rules of engagement" and then suggest he took this up separately with Steve, but no, he joined in on the attack. Incredible.
I find it hard to believe that it hasn't already reached its conclusion given that four judges who have considered all the arguments are in unison with saying no case to answer. Any continuation of legal action seems to be an exercise in measuring how many times SISU have to hear it before they stop.
I find it hard to believe that it hasn't already reached its conclusion given that four judges who have considered all the arguments are in unison with saying no case to answer. Any continuation of legal action seems to be an exercise in measuring how many times SISU have to hear it before they stop.
I want legal action to reach its conclusion now its been started. DOn't understand why nobody would.
If SISUI are right... we need things out in the wash.
If they're wrong... we need things out in the wash, and if they're wrong it's not like they'll be looking out for us anyway, is it?
It's being used as an excuse for others to distress a failing business in CCFC.
Is TF right that the Trust haven't handed in their accounts for 3 years? If so, that is really unprofessional.
I refer back to Ched Evans...
I wouldn't be averse to us moving on to JR2 btw, but think the calls for legal action to stop before talks resume are slightly worrying (what do people want to hide?) and also conveniently timed.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Christ reading that is unreal. TF really trying to put SBR in a position. Another "don't look at us look at them" moment. The whole thing is tosh. The SCG was set up to improve match-day experience - probably discussed in less than half of those minutes.
Fair play Steve, I know you have the best interests of CCFC at heart.
Do you think all legal action has merit then?
You'd support endless legal action so that we "can get the truth"? And then what?
I refer back to Ched Evans...
I wouldn't be averse to us moving on to JR2 btw, but think the calls for legal action to stop before talks resume are slightly worrying (what do people want to hide?) and also conveniently timed.
I too don't see why talks on the Ricoh have to stop because of the legal noise
So instead of blindly following one dogmatic rhetoric, how about efforts are made to concentrate all parties to talk without prejudice?
I'm all for that.
That is a fair point.
It's annoying as well as the last set of minutes actually represented Fisher quite well, it seemed progress was being made. The second half of *these* represent O-K too, but that's lost in the noise.
Good man
This has taken the thread rather off topic however
So, still want to know what kind of moron privately mails the chair to find out who turned up, rather than just reading the publicly available minutes.
Or, of course, which kind of moron doesn't spot the gaping hole in their cover story...
No idea shmmeee, but I don't buy all the 'legal noise', 'drop the legals', etc, etc. With respect to wasps I think its a simple as wanting to distress the club and put them in an even worse negotiating position so the club have no choice but to accept a substantially worse take it or leave it offer.To what end?
We know why Sisu would want to distress ACL, why would anyone want to distress CCFC? Who gains?
That is a fair point.
It's annoying as well as the last set of minutes actually represented Fisher quite well, it seemed progress was being made. The second half of *these* represent O-K too, but that's lost in the noise.
Also odd one from Mr strange.
When TF was asked when will the legal action stop. We can't get anywhere whilst it's going on.
As a Coventry why would Mr strange defend Joy Seppalla's right to carry on with the legal action.
It was just defeated legal action it was pummelled then three appeal judges agreed with the high court judge.
4 very senior judges said the legal action had no merit.
If the legal action is holding the club back why would anyone as a Cov fan want it to confinue.
Very bizzare
It was also annoying when people asked TF a question but JS answered!!!
Fisher claiming the trust couldn't run a multi million pound turnover company.
How's SISU doing ?
Why would CCFC fans believe liquidation is a way forward?
Far more bizarre.
Ironic coming from you, someone who keeps posting on Wasps behalf.
No one believes what SISU say, its just some read it differently to you. That's life.
Once commenced (and a judge has accepted there is a case to answer) then it should go through the due process without artificially being stopped, yes.It won't be endless, don't be daft. It has a natural conclusion to process.
What we need is *more* transparency, not shady deals to draw up a cloak. We need a light shone on *more* than the legal action will do so... not a blind acceptance of good and bad, and taking set positions that wilol endlessly go round and round, with rumour and innuendo the weapons for years that mean none of the parties involved can truly move on.
After this is all done, we need the capability to put it behind us, and that won't happen if things are left unsaid.
I think the dig is they'd fail the fit and proper persons test - no money, failing to file accounts for 3 years and forgetting to put private and confidential on letters they want secret. Let's be honest that's 3 nil down with 3 own goals before the game has even kicked off
Perhaps their legal team are 'No Win No Fee'
not sure they can take the moral high ground to be honest. The minutes of our chairman arguing about terminology of what was included in a letter with someone who wants the owners to leave doesn't put them in a good light at all
I thought we'd established this was kind of the case. JR1 is dead in the water.... If we are going to do this then lets at least get on with JR2.
In a game they have said they are not attempting to play. Do you think Joy has passed the fit and proper test?I think the dig is they'd fail the fit and proper persons test - no money, failing to file accounts for 3 years and forgetting to put private and confidential on letters they want secret. Let's be honest that's 3 nil down with 3 own goals before the game has even kicked off
I thought we'd established this was kind of the case. JR1 is dead in the water.... If we are going to do this then lets at least get on with JR2.
Again a complete waste of time. However I agree if it's going to happen anyway then ditch JR1 like all the judges are telling us to do.
Then get on with JR2 so when that gets kicked into the dust.
We can actually try and move forward in a sensible way.
Bit like SISU then?It's not even about the moral high ground is it. Trying to take over a club with no means to fund it from day to day.
No idea shmmeee, but I don't buy all the 'legal noise', 'drop the legals', etc, etc. With respect to wasps I think its a simple as wanting to distress the club and put them in an even worse negotiating position so the club have no choice but to accept a substantially worse take it or leave it offer.
I agree with NW, the trust and fans should be pushing the "everyone get around the table and discuss without prejudice or preconditions" line
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?