They would have posted it , you drama queen.
He's nothing more than a SISU mouthpiece.
His position is that everything SISU are doing is fantastic and fully embraced by the majority of fans and anyone who disagrees should be banned from any engagement with the club.
The SCG minutes are testament to this.
If true, he needs voting off pronto !
If true, he needs voting off pronto !
I get the distinct impression SBT (or any critical voice) would not have representation if the club could get away with it.
Jan, can you ask them about opening the real ale bar? Football fans like decent beer as well. Cheers.
(ask them to ask Wasps)
Was open for most of the last few games of last year. Very nice it was too. Served by teenage fuckwits of course.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which block was that nearest to?
Tesco stand about block 18. They had Coventry ales too..can't remember the brewery name.
I am going to meeting on Thursday and will try and bring up any questions people have and report answers back here. Personally I believe the SCG would have more relevance if supporters felt that it actually represented them rather than being viewed as a cosy old boys talking shop. Many groups are represented by various members but some members (myself included) represent no one. I think it members should be elected by their peers rather than simply because they turned up or were invited. It would be an idea to look at what happens at other clubs - take the best model and try and implement it here. It has never been more important for supporters to feel closer to the club, we have had a fraught and divisive few years and we need to put the past behind us and start building bridges if the club is to move forward and prosper. The SCG should be an important vehicle for fans but currently is viewed by many as irrelevant or ineffective.
Anyway either post questions here or PM me
The reason the SCG is all we have is mostly due to the abject failure of the Trust (founder A Jan) which has all but disappeared up its own hole DESPITE having an amazing 2500 members!
This includes;
Flip flopping between Sisu out and not out and NOPM
Failing to collect a measly one pound in membership fees for 2 years therefore having no funds to do anything.
Can't seem to organise any meetings.
Fooled by Haskell and therefore both looking like patsys AND pissing the club off once and for all.
Having no influence on return to the Ricoh.
Sucking up to Wasps like grinning idiots.
This, despite having a politburo of about 10 people. Quite an achievement . Makes the SCG (who influenced the new Ricoh seating arrangements) seem quite proactive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
UggestThe reason the SCG is all we have is mostly due to the abject failure of the Trust (founder A Jan) which has all but disappeared up its own hole DESPITE having an amazing 2500 members!
This includes;
Flip flopping between Sisu out and not out and NOPM
Failing to collect a measly one pound in membership fees for 2 years therefore having no funds to do anything.
Can't seem to organise any meetings.
Fooled by Haskell and therefore both looking like patsys AND pissing the club off once and for all.
Having no influence on return to the Ricoh.
Sucking up to Wasps like grinning idiots.
This, despite having a politburo of about 10 people. Quite an achievement . Makes the SCG (who influenced the new Ricoh seating arrangements) seem quite proactive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am going to meeting on Thursday and will try and bring up any questions people have and report answers back here. Personally I believe the SCG would have more relevance if supporters felt that it actually represented them rather than being viewed as a cosy old boys talking shop. Many groups are represented by various members but some members (myself included) represent no one. I think it members should be elected by their peers rather than simply because they turned up or were invited. It would be an idea to look at what happens at other clubs - take the best model and try and implement it here. It has never been more important for supporters to feel closer to the club, we have had a fraught and divisive few years and we need to put the past behind us and start building bridges if the club is to move forward and prosper. The SCG should be an important vehicle for fans but currently is viewed by many as irrelevant or ineffective.
Anyway either post questions here or PM me
can someone ask what Tim Fisher is actually doing?
can someone ask what Tim Fisher is actually doing?
.....having read all of this interesting stuff I have a confession ; I don't know what SCG stands forointlaugh:
[h=3]Supporters Consultative Group[/h].....having read all of this interesting stuff I have a confession ; I don't know what SCG stands forointlaugh:
What is the point of this old bollox every month or so......
...just a massive waste of time.....
Everyone involved in these meetings should just spend the equivalent time doing voluntary work instead.......far more valuable & productive
.....or just stare at the wall.....still far more valuable & productive.
In summary.....ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Uggest
Rubbish, as always you talk garbage and do not know true facts. At least Jan is not a coward and hides behind a keyboard, he has put his head on the block with good intentions.
He is not on the Trust Board.
What are the "true facts" then? Would love to know. I gave my opinion based on what I saw - not sure what is cowardly about that. Its a message board you oaf.
Do not want to get off thread and I may well be an "Oaf" but do not hide that fact or of who I am.
Its people like you that stop a lot of fringe posters coming on this site as all you do is knock others, hide behind a silly name name and wander off into your own private world.
Firstly the Trust is over 12 years old and was not founded by Jan, he has only been a Trust member for a few years. He is not even on the Board of the Trust (although personally I wish he was). Jan was a major part of the two marches through the City and has always thrived to help anything that might help out the Football team and its supporters.
Our decisions on where we stand is decided by our members not us alone, I may not agree with every stance but I stand by the majority.
The £1 membership was in place before most of us were involved in the Trust, no reason to change it although we are looking at a system to possibly re new memberships. Why do we need excessive money anyway, we have a fighting fund for that and you will see from out accounts we do have money in the bank.
Haskell approached us, what would you say? "No thanks Mr Haskell we are not interested in talking to anyone" . Its in all our interest to talk to all and any party that shows an interest that might help our club.
As for the Wasps, so what if anyone wants to go to games, I go to Cov Rugby ( I have a Coventry RFC Shirt), been to the Ice Hockey, Cricket, Horse Racing even to a Super Bowl is that a crime. Also if Wasps want to talk to the Trust or anyone else we have to at least consider as to why not?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?