I don't know names to point any fingers.. It was in that court document last time around where they were on about targeting sepalla or something like thatWho amongst the fans reps do you think "plotted against [the club] with PR Companies" [Webber Shandwick]?
I don't know names to point any fingers.. It was in that court document last time around where they were on about targeting sepalla or something like that
All sounds a bit insubstantial to me. In the absence of evidence - names, dates, who did what etc. - accusations of "plotting" ie. entering into a secret plan with one or more other persons to do something harmful or illegal - is pretty strong stuff.
There are readers who will make assumptions about who you are referring to from other posts in this thread. I am sure that is not what you intended, but you might like to clarify.
I also didn't think it was the person you thought people may assume.
I don't think it was illegal activity. I have had another look and it is a Supporters Direct email address. I don't know who has access to those and why supporters direct would want to email them themselves.
I have been assured it was nobody from the trust board and I am inclined to believe it, so apologies!
He meant you!
OK ok you got me.
Yes the SCG is now run by sisus hand picked people who actually represent no one, they are in ore of our marvelous open owners, and don't believe theRe are actually any problems.
PUSB
you would think there would be some sort of representation on here like KingHarvest used to do though.
I agree it should just be about match day, ticket issues etc.
I don't think having certain people on the scg is going to go very far in keeping all fans compliant is it?
Right to answer your post compliance by division ie divide the supporters fill the SCG with people that represent nobody except themselves and attempt to get certain other reps kicked off,compliance by diversion ie instigate in fighting amongst the supporters to deflect attention from the real issues.
Finally the masterstroke compliance by misinformation(best I can come up with) ie tell the most voiciferous group,yes me included about Wasps before it was announced knowing that we would offer to help which we did to be then told we have it under control. Very clever knowing that surely they must know what they're doing:facepalm:again knowing that when it did come out it would be too late.
Whatever happened to Sandra Garlick?
she was getting us a new ground
Right to answer your post compliance by division ie divide the supporters fill the SCG with people that represent nobody except themselves and attempt to get certain other reps kicked off,compliance by diversion ie instigate in fighting amongst the supporters to deflect attention from the real issues.
Finally the masterstroke compliance by misinformation(best I can come up with) ie tell the most voiciferous group,yes me included about Wasps before it was announced knowing that we would offer to help which we did to be then told we have it under control. Very clever knowing that surely they must know what they're doing:facepalm:again knowing that when it did come out it would be too late.
Haven't read it yet, all this election rubbish for chairs. Don't think it's needed, sounds like a status thing.http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/scg-coventry-city-meeting-minutes-100216-2947883.aspx
Latest Minutes of SCG now on Club Website. These refer to an election of new Vice-Chair but no covering note to say who stood or who won. (Strange .... Jonathan Strange!)
SCG members wishing to put themselves forward for this position must e-mail JS by 24.00 on Sunday 31 January. The group will be advised of the candidates via e-mail on Monday 1 February. Kieran Crowley has kindly agreed to act as the returning officer. Members will need to e-mail their selection directly to Kieran. This will be handled in the strictest confidence. The deadline for voting will be 24.00 on Sunday 7 February. Kieran will inform JS of the outcome on Monday 8 February. JS will convey the result by e-mail to the group.
should be over, SCG members all informed on Monday. So why the secrecy?Haven't read it yet, all this election rubbish for chairs. Don't think it's needed, sounds like a status thing.
It's just going to tell the club beef to get stuff sorted.
Edit: Isn't it this bit?
So in progress?
should be over, Board all informed on Monday. So why the secrecy?
Whatever happened to Sandra Garlick?
she was getting us a new ground
Won't that be in the minutes from the meeting on Monday? If they are a month behind.should be over, SCG members all informed on Monday. So why the secrecy?
Still annoyed that they refused to put a thread in here the the normal fan to ask questions.
Hiding behind some people will use it to post abuse.
Nick and the other mods can remove those posts and deal with the individuals. The group should want to encourage fans to engage and get the questions asked that are important to them.
Still annoyed that they refused to put a thread in here the the normal fan to ask questions.
Hiding behind some people will use it to post abuse.
Nick and the other mods can remove those posts and deal with the individuals. The group should want to encourage fans to engage and get the questions asked that are important to them.
No idea why that wouldn't be welcome. Surely the whole point of it is for fans to put their views forward. More than happy for anyone to send me anything they want bringing up for both the Trust and the SCG either on here or in private on joinercj@gmail.com
Ahhh the stadium forum, what a load of bollocks that was.
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/new-stadium-release-1245942.aspx
This club has spouted such bullshit in the past
Won't that be in the minutes from the meeting on Monday? If they are a month behind.
That says all scg members voted, did it not work like that?
Can understand not putting results in the Minutes. But as the Ballot has now been held, you might think the result would be announced by a covering note.
Kieran Crowley has told me via Twitter that they intend to announce in the next set of Minutes, so expect to know around mid- March.
What's the issue with it?
Was it not a fair vote?
No idea why that wouldn't be welcome. Surely the whole point of it is for fans to put their views forward. More than happy for anyone to send me anything they want bringing up for both the Trust and the SCG either on here or in private on joinercj@gmail.com
How would we know? No details published of who stood, who won, how many voted. The whole thing is shrouded in secrecy.What's the issue with it?
Was it not a fair vote?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?