Seems to contradict The "Real Poll" on here? (1 Viewer)

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
I think it's more to do with not knowing the BPA full details. That's the main reason I support staying at the Ricoh because I can't support a 15k stadium that may or may not happen. I need certain details to be confirmed and concrete plans else I support a Ricoh agreement for now even though as I stress I hate wasps owning out stadium but without going in to the same shit argument it's the best deal for now as in two year we are homeless and regardless of any BPA deal it won't be done in 2 years.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Strange how they don't mention the actual result of the poll in the article. It was pretty much 50/50 while voting was open.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
And when did ANYONE listen to the fans? It wouldn't matter if it was 90/10 one way or the other.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Wasnt this the reason Grendal started the other poll? You're about a 3-4 days too late

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Wasnt this the reason Grendal started the other poll? You're about a 3-4 days too late

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
What this shows is that the respondents on SBT have a different opinion to the people who answered the poll on the CET. SBT voters are more in favour of a move to the Butts than the CET voters, what isn't known is the relative number of votes, though I would think it more likely voters on here are more likely to attend matches regularly. It would be interesting to find out how many votes CET poll got, I expect there were more than votes than the 99 received on SBT.
 
Last edited:

armybike

Well-Known Member
Strange how they don't mention the actual result of the poll in the article. It was pretty much 50/50 while voting was open.

Don't mention the result?

"Fifty-seven per cent of Coventry City fans who voted in our online poll would rather see their team playing at the Ricoh Arena."
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
Depends how many vote in this poll there's only a fanny full on here, 194 today at the moment out of an average gate of 12000ish.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Considering the coverage from the telegraph and this is a poll of telegraph readers you'd expect this result wouldn't you. maybe things are different over here because we actually bother to try and understand whats going on instead of swallowing any old shit because it's in the paper.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
What this shows is that the respondents on SBT have a different opinion to the people who answered the poll on the CET. SBT voters are more in favour of a move to the Butts than the CET voters, what isn't known is the relative number of votes, though I would think it more likely voters on here are more likely to attend matches regularly. It would be interesting to find out how many votes CET poll got, I expect there were more than votes than the 99 received on SBT.

It's said out of the hundreds of voters.
So yes quite a few more than on here to be fair.
 

armybike

Well-Known Member
It's said out of the hundreds of voters.
So yes quite a few more than on here to be fair.

Yes, but it's Cov Telegraph so you can't believe a word they say........ ;)
 

armybike

Well-Known Member
Sorry to point out but in the first reply to the thread Otis has cracked that joke already. ;)

/me crosses Otis off Christmas card list o_O
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
And when did ANYONE listen to the fans? It wouldn't matter if it was 90/10 one way or the other.

I think the only time fan power worked Torch was the marches through the town, coupled with the lack of appetite to flock to Northampton. I doubt very much a slight majority of "hundreds" voting in an on line poll is something the CT could honestly say is the opinion of the fan base.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
I think it is probably skewed... Garry Wollaston probably voted 100 times, from 100 different computers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top