Shit List (1 Viewer)

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Now we have a manager in charge I think you will find the list will get shorter and shorter.

no grendel you dont udnerstand

thorn=great manager

players=all their fault

so really andy thorn had his hands tied.:facepalm:
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
I don't think it is physically possible for grendel to read a thread without somehow liking it back to thorn. I do feel sorry for you mate.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
there should be no damn shit list if it leads to boos

i thought jordan clarke was shit 3 years ago,i let it out on the forum after games but never once booed him on the pitch.

That's my point these muppets who boo and trash a players confidence one minute, love them the next minute.

Carl Baker, Bell and Hussey have bags of ability. They need the crowd to give them that extra boost.
We need players like that to give us an edge.
 
Last edited:

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
there should be no damn shit list if it leads to boos

i thought jordan clarke was shit 3 years ago,i let it out on the forum after games but never once booed him on the pitch.


Also players do read these forums and sayind a young kid Jordan Clarke is shit. I would guess is going to do one of a couple of things
Either he won't give a toss what you say and it won't affect him or it will affect his confidence and you are cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Bit of a pointless thing to post if you ask me about a young kid breaking into the cov team.
 
Last edited:

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Same here. I don't think Clarke is good enough but wouldn't boo him.

i thought jordan clarke was shit 3 years ago,i let it out on the forum after games but never once booed him on the pitch.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Also players do read these forums and sayind a young kid Jordan Clarke is shit. I would guess is going to do s couple of things
Either he so.t give a toss what you say and it won't affect him or it will affect his confidence and you are cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Bit of s pointless thing to post if you ask me about a young kid breaking into the cov team.
so from now on we shouldnt discuss players performances unless they play well?

WHAT THE FUCK?

you want to censor the forums aswell so that players dont get feelings hurt?

WHAT THE FUCK?

whats next? stop discussions at the pub incase it gets back to a player?

clarke was lightweight and crap,he has improved alot but still might not be the answer, i am entitled to my opinion, he gets my encouragement on the pitch,i will not LIE or censor myself just in case he browses forums haha
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
so from now on we shouldnt discuss players performances unless they play well?

WHAT THE feck?

you want to censor the forums aswell so that players dont get feelings hurt?

WHAT THE feck?

whats next? stop discussions at the pub incase it gets back to a player?

clarke was lightweight and crap,he has improved alot but still might not be the answer, i am entitled to my opinion, he gets my encouragement on the pitch,i will not LIE or censor myself just in case he browses forums haha

You are entitled to your opinion. However saying an 17/18 kid breaking into the first team is shit on a forum that he may or may not read seems to me like I say, a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Ever heard of the term contstructive criticism. Like I am doing to you now :).

Maybe as above you could have said Clarke is a bit lightweight and needs to bulk up as oppose to Clarke is shit.

Up to you what you put really and yes you are entitled to to your opinion and there's mine.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
You are entitled to your opinion. However saying an 17/18 kid breaking into the first team is shit on a forum that he may or may not read seems to me like I say, a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Ever heard of the term contstructive criticism. Like I am doing to you now :).

Maybe as above you could have said Clarke is a bit lightweight and needs to bulk up as oppose to Clarke is shit.

Up to you what you put really and yes you are entitled to to your opinion and there's mine.

You not giving one single word of criticism to Thorn, in fact making him out to be some sort of managerial genius, didn't work.

He was still crap.

Positive thinking can only work so much, can say "I've got a 12 inch cock" as many times as I like, but it's not going to make 4 inches fall off it.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
ahahahh i like that one!

i said i thought he was shit,you never read my actual posts it seems as i gave opinions why i felt that was the case

and as lord points out,your ianbility to criticise thorn shows that blind posititivty does not work
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I don't think it is physically possible for grendel to read a thread without somehow liking it back to thorn. I do feel sorry for you mate.

I feel sorry for the people who supported him. Perhaps on the anniversary of his departure we can bring out a few of the "golden oldies" - the posts saying he was the greatest since Jimmy Hill.

It gives me no satisfaction to say I was right about him - but I was.
 

psgm1

Banned
I feel sorry for the people who supported him. Perhaps on the anniversary of his departure we can bring out a few of the "golden oldies" - the posts saying he was the greatest since Jimmy Hill.

It gives me no satisfaction to say I was right about him - but I was.

Absolutely. Total hypocricy. Its was OK to praise him to the hilt, yet they constantly tried to shout down anyone who suggested he wasn't up to the task.

The thorn era proved some home truths.

1) Just because the majority suggetst something does NOT mean it is necessarily true.
2) Blind support will NOT make an incompetent player play well
3) You CAN determine the ability of a manager / player in a few weeks.
4) When you cannot back up your argument without insults, you have no argument!

It was pathetic the pro-thorn guys would always insult people who suggested he was no good. Its notable that the pro thorn "fans" are the only ones who keep bringing up people bringing up Thorn (the person who attacked Grendel is a perfect example).

Has no argument, so simply puts a personal attack!
 

Nick

Administrator
Didn't somebody say that if Thorn was the West Ham manager they would have won the league by loads of points?

Why shouldn't people air their feelings on a forum? It is much better than booing a player at the game. Does that mean that people shouldn't be able to give honest reviews about films in case they hurt the actors feelings? What about restaurant reviews? What if the owner gets a bad review?
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
there should be no damn shit list if it leads to boos

i thought jordan clarke was shit 3 years ago,i let it out on the forum after games but never once booed him on the pitch.
I read this post.

It says you let it out on a forum that you thought Jordan Clarke was shit 3 years ago.

I have no problem with people expressing opinions on forums.

As I am expressing mine. If you posted that you thought a 17/18 year old kid just breaking into the team was shit in a forum that he may read. Then in my opinion you are nearly as bad as those who boo players at games.

Personally I would not call a young player trying to develop shit. I would post something more constructive.

If you did do this and not just post that he was shit then fairplay, however reading your post above I think you can see where I was coming from.

Nick if someone beside you in the stand shouted Jordan Clarke you are Shit in his early days. Or if it was done to Daniels now. What would you think about them. I know it is up to them but I can say that I think it is a pointless stupid thing to do.

I have never said people can't post what they want. They can but I can also express an opinion that I think calling a player shit that may read it. Does no good.
 
Last edited:

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Now regarding AT which is a seperate mater that I did not bring up. Which seems to be a bit of a red herring away from the calling a young player shit debate.

Yes I was the one with the west ham comment. Do you think that West Ham squad with the talent at its disposal should have won the league?

If I remember correctly Grendal was the only person at the start of the,season, saying AT should be given the first 3 to 4 games before a decision is made on his future. Yet he was sacked after 3 draws and a win.
Most people said 10 games I felt longer was required.

So now I feel I don't know either way if he would have achieved or not. I have no issue having a word said against him.

This squad should be promoted. My personal opinion is it will happen with Robins. I also feel it probably would have happened with AT.

As much as I don't know if it would have, those who say no chance also have no idea. Who can tell anything after three games ?
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Didn't somebody say that if Thorn was the West Ham manager they would have won the league by loads of points?

Why shouldn't people air their feelings on a forum? It is much better than booing a player at the game. Does that mean that people shouldn't be able to give honest reviews about films in case they hurt the actors feelings? What about restaurant reviews? What if the owner gets a bad review?[/QUOTE

You are missing the point

Editor of the guardian

' I had dinner at Jamie Oliver's restuarant yesterday, it was shit'

I think this will be an unlikely way to word a negative review
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Now regarding AT which is a seperate mater that I did not bring up. Which seems to be a bit of a red herring away from the calling a young player shit debate.

Yes I was the one with the west ham comment. Do you think that West Ham squad with the talent at its disposal should have won the league?

If I remember correctly Grendal was the only person at the start of the,season, saying AT should be given the first 3 to 4 games before a decision is made on his future. Yet he was sacked after 3 draws and a win.
Most people said 10 games I felt longer was required.

So now I feel I don't know either way if he would have achieved or not. I have no issue having a word said against him.

This squad should be promoted. My personal opinion is it will happen with Robins. I also feel it probably would have happened with AT.

As much as I don't know if it would have, those who say no chance also have no idea. Who can tell anything after three games ?

Well of course we don't know if he would have achieved. We don't know if AT will become an astronaut and be the first man on Mars. We don't know if he will not win a Nobel Prize in Science. Of course no-one knows the future only the past.

So we do know he got the club relegated. We do know he still didn't win a game in the next tier down. We do know he was statistcally the worst manager in a century.

So we know he was shit.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Well of course we don't know if he would have achieved. We don't know if AT will become an astronaut and be the first man on Mars. We don't know if he will not win a Nobel Prize in Science. Of course no-one knows the future only the past.

So we do know he got the club relegated. We do know he still didn't win a game in the next tier down. We do know he was statistcally the worst manager in a century.

So we know he was shit.

Don't use the word shit, he may read this be more constructive in your criticism......
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top