Should it become personal? (1 Viewer)

[weecohawena]

with the board of SISU.

NOPM, petitions and all that jazz really won't affect SISU at all. They are so far detached that they wouldn't really care.

The pressure should be put on Fisher, Seppala, Coleman personally to enact any sort of change. As long as they can escape without comment time and again nothing will change.

The Telegraph/national media should be going after them personally rather than petitions which they won't care about one bit. (Obviously unless the Telegraph know something we don't.)

 

---

[Nick]

I have said for a good while it should be aimed directly at SISU.

Yes, people will disagree with things like NOPM as they see it damaging their club. I doubt anybody would take issue with somebody absolutely hammering SISU in their world which is finance (as long as we know it wont damage CCFC, somehow).

I think Tim Fisher is by the book CCFC / Otium isn't he rather than up there with Seppala and Deering?

Again it depends what you define as personal? Standing outside houses and families are a big no no for me, but damaging SISU in their world away from CCFC then yes.

 

[stupot07]

No it shouldnt be personal

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[ceetee]

Have just agreed with OP on the thred=ad about SISU finances.
They are vulnerable to direct attack and we shouldn't be damaging ccfc in order to get at SISU

 

[weecohawena]

I have said for a good while it should be aimed directly at SISU.

Yes, people will disagree with things like NOPM as they see it damaging their club. I doubt anybody would take issue with somebody absolutely hammering SISU in their world which is finance (as long as we know it wont damage CCFC, somehow).

I think Tim Fisher is by the book CCFC / Otium isn't he rather than up there with Seppala and Deering?

Again it depends what you define as personal? Standing outside houses and families are a big no no for me, but damaging SISU in their world away from CCFC then yes.

Yes, definitely not outside houses etc but rather in the media. SISU/CCFC get talked about as the same thing but they aren't. Until Seppala, Coleman/SISU feel personally uncomfortable about media stories then I don't see anything changing.

 

[Cavan O'Doherty]

No it shouldnt be personal

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Yes it should

 

[Nick]

Yes, definitely not outside houses etc but rather in the media. SISU/CCFC get talked about as the same thing but they aren't. Until Seppala, Coleman/SISU feel personally uncomfortable about media stories then I don't see anything changing.

Again it depends what you mean by personal, we have seen some extreme shit about going to kids schools and standing outside houses.

I was pissed off that CCFC got caught up in the shit between the council and SISU, if the council had popped down to London and tore them to shreds in the financial world away from CCFC then I'd have no issue with it. Having a go at SISU as the company away from SISU I have no issue with, they are more than fair game. It is when it is having a go at SISU via CCFC I don't agree with.

The same as I wouldn't if the aim was to make Seppalla uncomfortable as in personally uncomfortable rather than business.

 

[JimmyHillsbeard]

Coleman?

 

[chiefdave]

This is the way to go, protests at games etc don't impact SISU in the slightest.

As has been said though keep it business related and not people turning up at their homes.

 

[Skyblueweeman]

No it shouldnt be personal

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

It has been from the council, one might argue...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Nick]

It has been from the council, one might argue...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And 100% ACL, which I disagreed with.

 

[JimmyHillsbeard]

Coleman?

 

[Nick]

Coleman?

yeah, one of the blokes who runs SISU with Joy. Dermot.

 

[JimmyHillsbeard]

yeah, one of the blokes who runs SISU with Joy. Dermot.

Ah. Thanks

 

[Otis]

with the board of SISU.

NOPM, petitions and all that jazz really won't affect SISU at all. They are so far detached that they wouldn't really care.

The pressure should be put on Fisher, Seppala, Coleman personally to enact any sort of change. As long as they can escape without comment time and again nothing will change.

The Telegraph/national media should be going after them personally rather than petitions which they won't care about one bit. (Obviously unless the Telegraph know something we don't.)

Become personal? Are we back to shitbombs through letterboxes again, as per GMK a few years back?

 

[stevefloyd]

Not Chris JHB

 

[Grendel]

Great idea. Just the thing to encourage new owners