thaiskyblue
New Member
i hate to admit it , but agree .
i hate to admit it , but agree .My last 2 posts look very hypocritical ha, however I think SISU must go, fact. However getting our club back to our city is most important at the minute. Id rather have SISU in charge in Coventry than someone else in Northampton
I tell you what bruce lee if SISU sell the club within 2 years of today ill buy you a season ticket for the ricoh, because obviously when they sell thats where we will play
Why else would Seppela have an interview
i hate to admit it , but agree .
Deleted member 5849;558964 May as well suggest that me posting here has got her running scared.[/QUOTE said:I Hope so
i hate to admit it , but agree .
An interview doesn't show she's desperate or NOPM is working, is my point.
It's an utterly illogical conclusion to draw, especially given the content.
May as well suggest that me posting here has got her running scared.
I agree one interview doesn't show she is desperate.
I disagree it is an illogical point of view.
This interview has to be assessed against a six year tenure.
Why shouldn't people read between the lines.? If they are wrong she has to deal with it and show she can 'shepherd' us out of it.
The ball is still in SISU's court.
they could try blowing it, loads of hot air comes out of their mouths.if it was one interview of many i think most would agree, however it is the 1 and only interview (someone feel free to correct me if she actualy done another interview regarding CCFC, or any of her other businesses for that mater) so it is only reasonable to ask why now?
1 logical answer could be that she is on the ropes, if you have any other logical reasons please feel free to share them.
you could be right, the ball may well be still in shitsu's court. it doesn't mean they have anything to hit it with.
they could try blowing it, loads of hot air comes out of their mouths.
i hate to admit it , but agree .
if it was one interview of many i think most would agree, however it is the 1 and only interview (someone feel free to correct me if she actualy done another interview regarding CCFC, or any of her other businesses for that mater) so it is only reasonable to ask why now?
1 logical answer could be that she is on the ropes, if you have any other logical reasons please feel free to share them.
you could be right, the ball may well be still in shitsu's court. it doesn't mean they have anything to hit it with.
if you have any other logical reasons please feel free to share them.
I have, in the link provided.
i would be interested to hear them but to be honest if the link goes where i think it does i couldn't be arsed to read it all. if you would be good enough to post a few key sentances that would be great.
well worth reading.
well worth reading.
When people ask if its working I assume it is in terms of returning to the Ricoh. There are 4 ways this can play out;
Club stay at Northampton and build a ground. Financial constraints make this very unlikely.
Move back to the Ricoh. If seppella wanted the interview to give here any credibility there is no chance given her statements
Sisu sell. The club is worthless without a ground so not ever likely.
Sisu re-evaluate at the end of the season and wind the whole operation up - very likely.
Ryton has a fair value too...
You have to also remember the value to SISU in a wider context about not backing down.
And the precedents they've set in the past of not backing down.
Potentially far more valuable than a small increase on value selling rather than liquidating.
Is it possible to liquidate the share? Surely it would simply revert to the FL in the event of club liquidation???/So you're saying it's Ricoh or bust?
Serious question, given the shit about Sisu that's been in the public eye and the general support City fans seem to have in most quarters, could you see the FL handing the GS to a fans consortium and maybe dropping us a league or two as "punishment" rather than liquidating the share?
After all, as they proved there doesn't have to be a direct correlation between the club owning the share and who the FL hand it to, it might work in our favour this time.
So you're saying it's Ricoh or bust?
I've always thought it's Ricoh or bust! Not convinced I want to be right on that tbh, but...
And to an extent, we should have been bust long before now. What other business would have £millions of debts and few assets bar 'goodwill'? Part of the reason we had traditionally late accounts were, we were told, difficulties in getting our owners to commit to funding us for the year ahead, and there's little to dispute that really is there? What is there that says we're a going concern beyond that?!?
I'd have also thought they only let us get away with liquidating (or intending to) Ltd. and staying in the league, because they stuffed up too. See the whole club wiped off the map, and it'd be far harder to justify a 'new' club appearing in its place.
If we were wiped off the map, it'd be mightily unfair on other clubs if we were allowed to start higher than, say, Aldershot or Maidstone were too. harsh, but imagine the outcry if it was another club than us.
Fairness doesn't come into it with the Football League. Why did we get a 10 point deduction for exciting admin without a CVA when Leeds got a 15 point deduction for the exact same thing?
There is no fixed penalty - the league were sympathetic to our cause due to the exceptional circumstance.
And a hard-nosed bitch saying "we'll sue the arse off you".
And what exactly were those "exeptional circumstances"?There is no fixed penalty - the league were sympathetic to our cause due to the exceptional circumstance.
There is no fixed penalty - the league were sympathetic to our cause due to the exceptional circumstance.
Well they should be sympathetic in the future as well then.
And what exactly were those "exeptional circumstances"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?