Simon Gilbert - Click Bait (2 Viewers)

Forums New posts
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
dongonzalos said:
Although I think most would have looked anyway if the headline said 'Hoffman denies meeting'
Click to expand...

Yes, spot on. You've admitted it's click bait.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Moff said:
You write fair points, sadly diminished by the crap line that the Observer is the 'darling of the clique' I could argue the Telegraph is the darling of the clique for people like you, (not my personal opinion as this is an internet forum and there's no cliques only in peoples minds) but that's just a shit argument, and its only used for finger pointing, and point scoring.

Local news is shit on both sides and it is click bait shit, like you said its both national and local and the world we live in, but isn't a reason for us to accept it. At a time when we need good local journalists we are sold short by petty back biting and point scoring.

As for your Edit, if you fucking hate the CT, but defend them because of comments on this site then perhaps you need to step back a bit, its just a forum.
Click to expand...

His hatred for Reid is funny given that back in the day Reid was very much the darling the left wing political clique in Coventry.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
torchomatic said:
Yes, spot on. You've admitted it's click bait.
Click to expand...

Yes the headline is designed to make people read.
If that's what you call click bait. Then yes it is.
The article was worth writing, it is worthwhile news.
The spiel at the end is getting the same as Les and the observor and isn't needed
 
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
dongonzalos said:
Yes the headline is designed to make people read.
If that's what you call click bait. Then yes it is.
The article was worth writing, it is worthwhile news.
The spiel at the end is getting the same as Les and the observor and isn't needed
Click to expand...

Well the first paragraph which contradicts the headline is new. The rest is just a rehash of several articles posted over the weekend, same quotes, etc.

Obviously I must be harder to please.
 
oldskyblue58

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
I learnt of this story at the match on Saturday and was told it originated from someone employed at the club. It didn't originate from the CT or SG. The CT is not wrong in putting the rumour to bed is it? The headline is designed to peak interest and get you talking...............

Think we are making a storm in a tea cup over this particular story.

The coverage of the events in this saga at the observer is worse in my opinion, amounting to a lot of propaganda, buzz words, self justification and opinion pieces which are then referred to as some kind of facts.

Fact of life, all news outlets write headlines that are designed to draw readers, purchasers, interested parties in. Cut and paste from previous articles is done at all newspapers. It is how the industry operates and the CT is not unusual in that. Unsurprisingly creating website clicks is important to them as it is to any other website

Do I think the journalistic contribution in this city is particularly good at bringing out the truth of what is going on - no, but Gilbert & Reid are both just doing their jobs. Both need to up their game and stick to journalism, cut out the personal comments on social media, keep it professional in my opinion. However I am sure both can point to people who support their product

Take it for what it is a means to create sales income
 
Last edited:
RegTheDonk

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
Skybluesince82 said:
I have had to click it twice myself now - I start getting wasps pop up adverts now on my screen.
Relevant bits copied and pasted:

.......
Click to expand...

Thanks 82.

The telegraph web site is friggin' horrendus for me. So slow with pop ups, or you have to mute some audio, or you have to keep closing down the adverts, or (and this is really a pain in the arse!) you have to answer some supid question to read the rest of the article. Would be grateful if, rather than just post a link to articles, posters could copy and paste the text here (like some used to do)?

I appreciate printed newspapers are dying and they need to pay the bills, but as you rightly say, they seem to be inventing any old shit or supposition just to get you to click. I'd genuinely rather pay a few quid every month for some kind of subscription version of the CT web site, IF they'd just fook off with the adverts and invested in proper journalism, rather than points scoring for WASPs or the Council.
 
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
dongonzalos said:
Yes the headline is designed to make you read.
Although I think most would have looked anyway if the headline said 'Hoffman denies meeting'
Click to expand...

475.gif
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
My favourite is the videos of planes landing in a bit of wind with some dramatic text.
 
Captain Dart

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
RegTheDonk said:
Thanks 82.

The telegraph web site is friggin' horrendus for me. So slow with pop ups, or you have to mute some audio, or you have to keep closing down the adverts, or (and this is really a pain in the arse!) you have to answer some supid question to read the rest of the article. Would be grateful if, rather than just post a link to articles, posters could copy and paste the text here (like some used to do)?

I appreciate printed newspapers are dying and they need to pay the bills, but as you rightly say, they seem to be inventing any old shit or supposition just to get you to click. I'd genuinely rather pay a few quid every month for some kind of subscription version of the CT web site, IF they'd just fook off with the adverts and invested in proper journalism, rather than points scoring for WASPs or the Council.
Click to expand...

Just install adblock plus on your browser, gets rid of 90% of it.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
dutchman said:
Doesn't stop those annoying and often irrelevant videos from playing though.
Click to expand...
Christ yeah those videos are truly amazing. Random strips of road, random cars pulling out in front of lorries, clips of empty buildings...

And often on articles totally unrelated.

Worse, they now load anyway, in the bottom right of my screen. Maybe they just want me to stop going onto their website?
 
duffer

duffer

Well-Known Member
Silsden said:
The Telegraph website's articles are so littered with with adverts and pop ups it's practically unreadable.

If you do make sense out of it, turns out to be more tripe like this and you wish you hadn't bothered...
Click to expand...

Completely agree, the CET site is hideous now. Regardless of differing opinions on the quality of the journalism, I have to go to the Observer just to give my eyes a rest!
 
singers_pore

singers_pore

Well-Known Member
The only time I read a CT story is when someone posts a link on here. Gilbert must love Nick, although it doesn't seem that the feeling is mutual.
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
The state of journalism today. Glad I jacked the idea after work experience in 1979. People on here should not be mopping brows and displaying signs of the vapours having discussed Gilbert v Reid on other posts. Both are a sad sign of the times.
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
Hobo said:
The state of journalism today. Glad I jacked the idea after work experience in 1979. People on here should not be mopping brows and displaying signs of the vapours having discussed Gilbert v Reid on other posts. Both are a sad sign of the times.
Click to expand...

What you mean is...

I jacked in an idea in 1979, click here to find out exactly why!
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Nick said:
What you mean is...

I jacked in an idea in 1979, click here to find out exactly why!
Click to expand...

You mean my big tits filmed on a supermarket camera....then just wait and see what happened next?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top