Playing Devil's Advocate here: If the council have nothing to hide, why have they tried so hard to prevent the details of the loans, etc. from being disclosed into the public domain?
So if the judge can't order disclosures at this particular stage, as you explain - why did SISU make the application?
Except she wins the majority of cases she takes to court. It is the way Sisu do business.
Playing Devil's Advocate here: If the council have nothing to hide, why have they tried so hard to prevent the details of the loans, etc. from being disclosed into the public domain?
Perhaps SISU could show them the way.
They've been pretty poor at disclosure - even on those things that they are legally obliged to disclose - and I'm sure that they "have nothing to hide".
Just playing Devil's Advocate here
That's not attempting to answer the question, merely employing the classic deflection tactic
Playing Devil's Advocate here: If the council have nothing to hide, why have they tried so hard to prevent the details of the loans, etc. from being disclosed into the public domain?
Even if everything is above board and 100% correct I would suspect basically because they don't want to give the other side material that could potentially be turned into ammunition to be used back against them when they don't have to.Playing Devil's Advocate here: If the council have nothing to hide, why have they tried so hard to prevent the details of the loans, etc. from being disclosed into the public domain?
Does JS actually win more legal cases or is it that she has deeper pockets to be able to continue the legal actions that outlasts her opponents ability to fund?
Even if everything is above board and 100% correct I would suspect basically because they don't want to give the other side material that could potentially be turned into ammunition to be used back against them when they don't have to.
Does JS actually win more legal cases or is it that she has deeper pockets to be able to continue the legal actions that outlasts her opponents ability to fund?
The companies etc that she takes action against are generally in a distressed state so have little in the way of fighting funds. If taking on professionals then they will make economic decisions in terms of benefit or loss in continuing an action often backed by insurance advisors. Are these "victories" on points of law or because the other side can not afford to fight the case further or decides not to. There is a big difference.
Cue predictable diatribes on SISU and Ms Seppala's litigation history!
Ah yes newbie who loves sisu
Unlike the oldi who worships ACL.
No you're don't you're with the newbie
Pleasestopbreakingquotetagseveryone
Does JS actually win more legal cases or is it that she has deeper pockets to be able to continue the legal actions that outlasts her opponents ability to fund?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?