top shout, what a bunch of low lifes, they have done serious damage to our club. get lost sisu.......they have the cheek to ask for ccc documants but withold all their own information ,,,,, it makes you laugh
What I don't get is that surely they have decent lawyers, what makes them think they have a case? Why are they so determined if it is that clear cut?
Desperation?
Their Lawyers probably get paid either way so they will be loving it.
It would appear that SISU are simply asking the Courts to make the Council hand over any documents that helps SISU's case for the pending Judicial review. If they believe that evidence is being suppressed they can ask the courts to act, as is their right.
It does not mean that such documents exist that proves SISU's case. It is simply SISU claiming that they must, as they believe the action to force a Judicial review was valid.
I see it as a supporting action for the appeal against the Judicial review, and not something completely new.
seppela dosen't do respect and politeness she's likes the bully tactics.Could they not do this with a freedom of information request first rather than involving the lawyers?
seppela dosen't do respect and politeness she's likes the bully tactics.
Ain't that the truth.Sisu = economic imperative = vulture capitalists = cnuts
What I don't get is that surely they have decent lawyers, what makes them think they have a case? Why are they so determined if it is that clear cut?
What I don't get is that surely they have decent lawyers, what makes them think they have a case? Why are they so determined if it is that clear cut?
shush, don't tell them , mums the word.Because sadly lawyers get paid a large fee by the hour and some of them will take on nearly any case (For the avoidance of any doubt I'm not suggesting that is the case here but it has been known to happen). Also Joy is used to getting her own way and isn't afraid to resort to the courts if she isn't getting it. The only thing that really surprises me is that the Higgs haven't been targeted yet by SISU as surely they must be considered fair game as one of the ACL shareholders.
There is someone close to me who works for a firm of City lawyers. The firm has a client with a property portfolio worth several billions and they initiate dozens of actions for this client every year, most of which are without merit and end in failure. The firm has no option but to accept the instructions of the client.
Why do they do it? Because it brings pressure and causes distress to the party that the property company has a dispute with.
Could they not do this with a freedom of information request first rather than involving the lawyers?
This weeks events....
ACL say.. "Lets talk?"
CCC say "Lets talk?"
CCFC/OTIUM(regretably they are the same)... "Lets go to court... !"
home for christmas..... which christmas?
Its a bloody disgrace......:blue:
This sums the current situation up very nicely.
Sisu poorly timed, poorly judged.
The application wouldn't have gone in today. Did CCC or ACL know about it prior to it going in?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?