Sisu launch new High Court bid to challenge £14.4m bail out of Ricoh Stadium owners (2 Viewers)

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Usual Sisu trying to shift any positives the fans see, Lets throw another spanner in the works.

Just trying to alienate everyone so they can then use that as an excuse..

No one would talk to us we have done nothing wrong, Didums

They should just fuck off.

to be honest this latest application is just part of the normal process that would occur in many court cases. It really isnt headline news nor is it I suspect something that the CCC legal advisors did not expect. Will it turn anything up ? who knows it might, it might not even if it does it doesnt mean it is significant or it could be (but if it was significant why was application not made before?) We wont know until we get the judgement 28/11/13.

Releasing details of the application has deflected attention from the things ACL & CCC have been saying. A discovery application is just part of the process, but those closely involved and releasing the information would know that wouldnt they
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Odd really as legal costs weren't a priority when trying to put the club into administration.

Come on, FP; we've discussed this ad infinitum, so let's not raise it again. SISU were threatening liquidation, and in the face of that, ACL's directors have a duty to the company to seek protection via administration. It's not like they rushed in, is it? Numerous discussions, High Court case won, Third Party debt order to collect the arrears, etc. etc.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
The same as joe elliott and hoffman?

With the small difference that they're at least Cov fans, and Joe at least has put his own money into the club rather than siphoning cash out of it.

JE may or may not be misguided, and backing SISU turned out to be a mistake, given. But comparing him in any way to Fisher, who has been caught out now so many times that I've lost track, is quite frankly, bullshit.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Come on, FP; we've discussed this ad infinitum, so let's not raise it again. SISU were threatening liquidation, and in the face of that, ACL's directors have a duty to the company to seek protection via administration. It's not like they rushed in, is it? Numerous discussions, High Court case won, Third Party debt order to collect the arrears, etc. etc.

Be fair Mary Mungo and Midge, most posters have set out their points in detail numerous times. FP posts in one liners, he is still catching up and still formulating his case!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top