Just listened to an interview between fisher and daryl murphy on free radio from march.couple of things he said. It was in response to the transfer embargo placed on the club and the matter of the debt order placed on the club for the owed rent. He said that sisu cannot continue running the club's when they we're losing the ammount of money they were each month.he said he feared for the future of the club as sisu could quite easily just walk away.When asked about possibly new buyers he said that as far as he was aware the were no interested partys on the horizon.also he stated that their accounts had been frozen.I just wanted to know is it still the case that their bank accounts are still frozen if so suerly this would totally knock their plans of a ground share and a new stadium on the head as they have no way of paying for anything.
If their bank accounts are frozen, then how have they been paying players?
Just listened to an interview between fisher and daryl murphy on free radio from march.couple of things he said. It was in response to the transfer embargo placed on the club and the matter of the debt order placed on the club for the owed rent. He said that sisu cannot continue running the club's when they we're losing the ammount of money they were each month.he said he feared for the future of the club as sisu could quite easily just walk away.When asked about possibly new buyers he said that as far as he was aware the were no interested partys on the horizon.also he stated that their accounts had been frozen.I just wanted to know is it still the case that their bank accounts are still frozen if so suerly this would totally knock their plans of a ground share and a new stadium on the head as they have no way of paying for anything.
rent lease agreement was / is with Ltd not holdings account player paid by holdings
But this was before all the administration had started.he said sisu's accounts had been frozen . Nothing about holdings or ltd?
yes but they could not freeze an account from a company that did not have a rent agreement with them which has always been Ltd
as for the fork tongued one he spout inaccuracies every other day ........unaware of any other interested parties? Hmmm:thinking about::thinking about::
don't believe anything TF says - it is impossible to analyse
The third party debtor orders were taken out against CCFC Ltd and CCFC H. It froze what was in the accounts etc on the particular day not the account. They were for a specified period which has now expired for ccfch. When CCFC Ltd went into administration the third party debtor orders became void.
At no time were the SISU own accounts frozen. Whether SISU have investors willing to back them and put more funds into the CCFC project is a different question. It depends what they have been told and who they are. I suspect they have already taken advantage of any losses generated in previous years
It's definitely what fisher said. .fisher bending the truth again what a suprise.the whole interview was trying to make sisu out to being hard done by...
exactly .............
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?