Seems to have taken a step backwards if you read through the thread!
There are 4 of you - what do the other 3 say - and the SBT rep should be ejected through here not a coronation
How democratic is the SBT? Do the 4 board members decide what to do or do their ideas get voted on by the other members? If it's the former is there any point having a representative from here when the board might carry on with the same pro-council, pro-wasps, anti-SISU agenda.
We don’t have a seat with that capability.
Sorry this really isn’t difficult.
The main objective rather than some boring point scoring is to try and create some unity across various groups where there is discourse
Even that weird group ran by that creep Jonathan Strange has a trust member
It’s clear if there are spaces then the Trust allocated a space to this message board. They make vetting rules for applicants to be considered and we elect a member into the board with specific aims and objectives from this forum.
I would put myself forward but how can I seriously take a place on a board (which is grandiosity at its best anyway) through a coronation and then represent this forum then I’ve not even been selected from the members here?
I mean this is ridiculous
What does that even mean? You sound like the PM for Equatorial Guinea
There are 4 of you - what do the other 3 say - and the SBT rep should be ejected through here not a coronation
Sorry this really isn’t difficult.
The main objective rather than some boring point scoring is to try and create some unity across various groups where there is discourse
Even that weird group ran by that creep Jonathan Strange has a trust member
It’s clear if there are spaces then the Trust allocated a space to this message board. They make vetting rules for applicants to be considered and we elect a member into the board with specific aims and objectives from this forum.
I would put myself forward but how can I seriously take a place on a board (which is grandiosity at its best anyway) through a coronation and then represent this forum then I’ve not even been selected from the members here?
I mean this is ridiculous
You’re expecting the equivalent of Labour Party members voting on the next leader of the Conservatives. You’re right. That is ridiculous. If you made a mistake and don’t really want the position you should at least have the decency to admit it.
I’ve said I will 100% stand for the post that’s allocated to this forum which has I think more members than the trust - which oddly was my position from the very beginning
I don’t even understand the analogy as I’ve said all people standing have to be trust members and can be vetted as such beforehand
Your a fraud. I’ve never been more convinced than I am now.
You're going about this backwards, and it does give the impression of entryism.I think you are losing your mind. I’ve said I will stand on the conditions I’ve set out which this forum embraces
You seem a bit frightened of something? What is it?
You're going about this backwards, and it does give the impression of entryism.
What's wrong with getting elected (or, more likely, just being allowed on as so few stand!) on an SBT platform, putting it into action? You'll lose all moral authority if we rise against you, you won't be able to fulfill what you stood on, and the next time your seat comes up somebody from here wopuld stand against you and there'd have to be an election. You'd lose as you'd be totally discredited.
Or... You could even get elected to the Trust board, and make it conditional on a positive result on a Sky Blue Talk referendum (how about we make the margin needed more than 52:48 though?). You could commit to resign if you didn't get that.
Or... you could commit to stand, but only if enough people here vote for you to stand before the deadline for submissions at the Trust.
All those would get you your democratic mandate from here, you could take your pick which one of those you think's appropriate for you.
I think you are losing your mind. I’ve said I will stand on the conditions I’ve set out which this forum embraces
You seem a bit frightened of something? What is it?
Okay. It’s about me.
You're going about this backwards, and it does give the impression of entryism.
What's wrong with getting elected (or, more likely, just being allowed on as so few stand!) on an SBT platform, putting it into action? You'll lose all moral authority if we rise against you, you won't be able to fulfill what you stood on, and the next time your seat comes up somebody from here wopuld stand against you and there'd have to be an election. You'd lose as you'd be totally discredited.
Or... You could even get elected to the Trust board, and make it conditional on a positive result on a Sky Blue Talk referendum (how about we make the margin needed more than 52:48 though?). You could commit to resign if you didn't get that.
Or... you could commit to stand, but only if enough people here vote for you to stand before the deadline for submissions at the Trust.
All those would get you your democratic mandate from here, you could take your pick which one of those you think's appropriate for you.
That's not an unreasonable suggestion.I think we should do a ballot on here - elect who we consider most appropriate from the list and propose to the trust that person sits on the board - we elect before the deadline
Believe me it has to be this way round so we can see if the elected person gets his or her place
Wasn't just him though was it Grendel thinking back now you are a nasty piece of work and one amicable meeting isn't going to change how your remarks have affected certain people
Sorry for the other thread, I never look for stickies!
Is it just Grendel, or is anyone else gonna put themselves forward? If not, do we just do a poll to get a show of hands of in favour or against?
Nick, are there many people on here that you know of with duplicate accounts that could significantly influence the outcome of any vote (not necessarily just on the Grendel nomination poll)?
Oh noI don't want to be splitting the vote here but surely Grendel and skybluetony176 come as a pairing and both should get nominated.
Can you nominate more than one person?
I don't really care who it is but if the trust really wants to open up then it needs to be more representative of a few blokes that can get down the pub in Cov at the last minute. We need a sub section where concerns on this board can be collated and taken to board meetings by somebody who won't just accept any old answer and will challenge them. We also need somebody to feed back what has been said at these stonemason meetings with Eastwood and Hoffman that the inner circle are only allowed to know, someone with the power to be able to say the trust refuse this meeting unless we are able to challenge the arguments and put responses out to fans. One representative from here would do a hell of a lot more to open the board up than anything it has done since forming.
So, inreality, is any one going to stand from the forum ?
I thought any Trust member could stand, be nominated. I m sure there are Trust members on the forum.The option is not available
I thought any Trust member could stand, be nominated. I m sure there are Trust members on the forum.
I ll pay your £1 Grendel.
Do nt think we should be precious about being called the Sky Blue Talk, Trust board member., just
someone from here to represent SBTs views.
I d be suprised if someone from the Forum stood and did nt get elected if we voted for him / her.
pusb .
Is this not happening now then?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?