deanocity3
New Member
Last edited:
I think what is called for is a massice chorus of "Stuart Linnell, what a wanker" from the SBA next week at Port vale, and then for someone to ring up and ask if he heard it!
There were plenty of dicks talking about boycotting Papa John's becuae they sponsor the Football League a few weeks ago.
Just hope nobody finds out that Sisu have shareholdings in Esso and BP, the Jimmy Hiller's will be knackered getting to Northampton on their bikes.
You are right but I already said it was both pedantic and a rubbish point? My view here is just to make the point that it is indirectly giving money to Otium and that is all.
no its not .. its giving money to sky.. end of..
i pay uk tax.. and i dont agree with where a lot of uk goverment money goes. but im not the person handing that mone out!.. the deal sky have with the clubs predates any match i might watch in a pub.. you can link anything if you try hard enough.. its
Probably the first thing you've said that I agree with. Thudddddddddd
The death of football as we knew it can be traced right back to SKY and the beginning of the Premier League
Yes it is! For goodness sake, listen to yourself? You pay tax as you say and yes while you don't get to decide how it's spent, you are effectively paying indirectly to where ever that money goes? The key was 'indirectly'.
There were plenty of dicks talking about boycotting Papa John's becuae they sponsor the Football League a few weeks ago.
Yes it is! For goodness sake, listen to yourself? You pay tax as you say and yes while you don't get to decide how it's spent, you are effectively paying indirectly to where ever that money goes? The key was 'indirectly'.
OK, so following your logic - we all pay our TV license, hence SISU get a cut from CWR commentary; we all presumably drive, so SISU are getting a cut from BP etc; we all pay rates so all who live in Cov are giving ACL something; presumably we all have a landline, so we're giving money to BT or Virgin who indirectly pay for carrying the murdoch empire, some of which is dished out to the football league and City get a cut - so we're ALL guilty of giving into SISU and NOPM has failed.
YES! Finally the penny drops. It's not the argument at fault here just the 'fact' in the statement by Linnell. The fact is , as you have correctly now agreed, he was right! Stupid I know but my point was always about the fact being undeniable. Thanks for proving it.
I know right, he didnt really have a clue what he was talking about
I think the point he was trying to make, if loads of people watch on sky then this means sky are more likely to show Coventry games in the future. The more we are on sky the more money the club receive
He just didnt put the point across very well
YES! Finally the penny drops. It's not the argument at fault here just the 'fact' in the statement by Linnell. The fact is , as you have correctly now agreed, he was right! Stupid I know but my point was always about the fact being undeniable. Thanks for proving it.
Well now you have got me thinking. My plumber who services my boiler every year is I know a big City fan, should I ask if he is going to Sixfields, because I would to hate to think I was helping him go there and thus breaking my NOPM. Maybe it would be safer finding a plumber in future who is a Villa fan.It's not a "fact". You have no way of knowing what money goes where. According to this "fact" all boycotts everywhere are pointless because of the monetary system.
It's a five year olds argument. Not something a grown person shoul seriously consider.
Maybe it would be safer finding a plumber in future who is a Villa fan.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?