It can all be obtained here but I'm too tight to pay for it myself !
https://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/ltd/otium-entertainment-group
It can all be obtained here but I'm too tight to pay for it myself !You could be right.
"The aim of the legal action is not yet clear but it is likely Sisu would like to see the deal undone or for compensation to be paid for the negative impact on the football club"
even if (and its a huge if) SISU won JR2 I am not sure how the deal could be unpicked. The court could require CCC to revisit the decision on the sale of its 50% but I doubt it could make the Charity do that, and in any case they may well reach the same decision. It could penalise CCC but any payment of fine would not go to SISU, so even if the shares or lease was sold for undervalue no funds to SISU from the court case .
Then SISU take new court action for damages. They would have to prove they had a right to be offered a deal, that they had a connection to the stadium that gave that right, that it was this decision to sell to Wasps that damaged the club at the time (2014) and since, that they had made their intentions clear etc. They could not I think argue that the sale to Wasps was responsible for the losses before Oct 2014 so that knocks a big hole in any compensation claim
of course by that time, Oct 2014, SISU had broken the CCFC right to occupy the stadium and moved the club away. They had returned as a day renter with limited access to the stadium, their owner had said they would not interfere with the share sale, and the directors past and present repeatedly stated they were going to build their own stadium or partner up at BPA. They had of course argued that there was no value in ACL whilst proceeding with JR1. Would a court really be persuaded that the clubs fall from grace, its financial mess, was down to the sale of the shares and a lease extension? The rights to compensation look to be even more tenuous than under JR1
Every non attender reduces the amount the club can spend. It is a self sufficient club so supporters determine its budget
Its the impact of NOPM - some people seem to get a kick out of it
And those who no longer attend cannot bitch about budget cuts when that is down to them
This is the NOPM campaign that you've insisted for years is an excuse for people who wouldn't go anyway to use for not going.
The impact is as a result of ill advised court cases turning fans of, a result of an ill advised move to Northampton for god knows what purpose, a result of ill advised BS regarding everything from "moving on" to "building anew" to "we've identified X amount of sites" to "Were talking to X amount of authorities and agencies" to "exciting announcement in the new year" etc. etc. etc.
Pull your head out of your arse for a change. You championed this BS at every stage and now the cards have inevitably come crashing down you lay blame at a door you previously dismissed.
I'm actually warming to you now, sense at lastlets not make excuses for sisu. they raised prices this year,no wonder attendences are lower
no more jr's please. clearly not gonna win any. just sort club out or fuck offffffffffffff
Under normal circumstance/ownership I'd fully agree.Every non attender reduces the amount the club can spend. It is a self sufficient club so supporters determine its budget
I wonder if Bury fans,, or any other club in this league for that matter blame stay away fans for their plights and achievements considering we still pull in over double there attendances, simply amazing on how deluded some fans on here are.
Owners who have the fans interests HELPS any club, ours doesn't. No argument, just REALITY.So staying away HELPS the club's finances then?
Owners who have the fans interests HELPS any club, ours doesn't. No argument, just REALITY.
And those who no longer attend cannot bitch about budget cuts when that is down to them
So staying away HELPS the club's finances then?
Its the impact of NOPM - some people seem to get a kick out of it
Let's be honest - to get your "loyalty" they'd have to pay you to attend.Whereas our owners actions have proactively encouraged fans to remain loyal, old ones to return and new ones to arrive.
Get a grip you idiot.
Council "treated abhorrently"
This is the NOPM campaign that you've insisted for years is an excuse for people who wouldn't go anyway to use for not going.
The impact is as a result of ill advised court cases turning fans of, a result of an ill advised move to Northampton for god knows what purpose, a result of ill advised BS regarding everything from "moving on" to "building anew" to "we've identified X amount of sites" to "Were talking to X amount of authorities and agencies" to "exciting announcement in the new year" etc. etc. etc.
Pull your head out of your arse for a change. You championed this BS at every stage and now the cards have inevitably come crashing down you lay blame at a door you previously dismissed.
Does this mean more legal fees are due to the Council?
I guess they are also waiting for a spin off from Callum Wilson which will further prolong the agony !I am not doing NOPM. However I can see the rationale of those who do.
There is a point where SISU will realise breakeven is not achievable.
NOPM speeds up the arrival of that point.
At the moment selling players is delaying it.
I doubt it, no one is that daft are they ?I like this bit:
That's what people will now be repeating.
I like this bit:
Council "treated abhorrently"
That's what people will now be repeating.
Download the accounts free at companies houseIt can all be obtained here but I'm too tight to pay for it myself !
https://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/ltd/otium-entertainment-group
SISU and Fisher have behaved disgustingly with no justification for doing so. They have been handed their butts on a plate again so let's just enjoy it and not mock the messenger - the CT aren't an enemy of CCFC fans, they're on our side!
Let's be honest - to get your "loyalty" they'd have to pay you to attend.
I haven't championed any of it. Why are you lying?
I like this bit:
That's what people will now be repeating.
Just to be clear was this the hearing over if they could appeal the Supreme Court or the European Court? If its the Supreme Court can they still go ahead to the European Court or is that the end of it?
You've just repeated it. Where is that from?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?