CovInEssex
Well-Known Member
He's on £18k a week at Chelsea, which they pay... only when he plays.
Something I heard Saturday RE: Sterling's wages (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter CovInEssex
- Start date
Otis
Well-Known Member
CovInEssex
Well-Known Member
If we don't play him we foot his wages
hill83
Well-Known Member
No chance
BornSlippySkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Concur. What sort of a fucked up deal means we pay someone else’s player approximately 4 times the amount we pay our top earners for not even playing?
And I understand why it would be an incentive to make us play him, I just can’t believe we’d sign up to that. Surely...
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
bollocks
hill83
Well-Known Member
Maybe if it was for an absolute top of the line striker we'd have absolutely no chance of signing otherwise but even then. No chance.
CovInEssex
Well-Known Member
My source is reputable...had a cov scarf on at the bus stop
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee
Well-Known Member
rob9872
Well-Known Member
Thanks lol yep noted. Sat on my elbow
christonabike
Well-Known Member
Heard this as well from a reliable source. Football is awash with money and its just madness. Think of the money Chelsea etc get every season and paying youngsters this amount is just the norm sadly.
I heard that he has to play every week if he is fit but I doubt that is true as Robins is his own man and likes to play whoever earns it during training etc.
I heard that he has to play every week if he is fit but I doubt that is true as Robins is his own man and likes to play whoever earns it during training etc.
better days
Well-Known Member
It's more likely we have to make a contribution of say £1k per week if he's fit and not playing
Robins was asked almost this exact question a few weeks back and said there was an expectation by Chelsea that he'd get game time but he had to come up to standard
Robins was asked almost this exact question a few weeks back and said there was an expectation by Chelsea that he'd get game time but he had to come up to standard
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
To be fair that would still make him an inexperienced LB !
larry_david
Well-Known Member
He's got 5 weeks now to make the position his, pay to Chelsea or no pay to Chelsea
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
When he signed, people were jumping up and down in amazement that we'd managed to sign somebody of his class and pedigree...
Esoterica
Well-Known Member
I was pleased too but his class and pedigree are not worth a potential 18k expense a week to a L1 club and it would be grossly incompetent to have signed such a deal given how far 18k a week stretches in L1. Robins is not a fool. He already confirmed in one of his pre game interviews that there is an expectation from parent clubs that their loanees play but he picks the team based on what they do in training.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
He's not going to say otherwise, is he?
I'd also suggest that given his pedigree, it's more likely than not there's a penalty clause if he doesn't play. If we're going on statements, the dry way Robins said he was 'injured' earlier suggest a they were looking for an out.
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
well i heard chelsea pay us 18k everytime he plays! are sisu the best owners or what?! great deal
my source also reputable. he swore he was telling the truth
"swear down"
my source also reputable. he swore he was telling the truth
"swear down"
Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue
Well-Known Member
There's absolutely no chance we would pay 18k a week - even for a 30 goal a season striker, never mind an unproven right back. Our top earner can't be on any more than 3/4k and surely that would be a player like Chaplin, that's contracted (or set to be) to us.
Sterling could well be on 18k a week at Chelsea, doesn't mean we contribute 18k.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
It doesn't. At the same time, look at it another way, we also get a top top player for free for a season if it all works out.
High risk v high return.
This is how many loan deals work nowadays. Chelsea will be paying his wages, we will be contributing. If he starts then we pay nothing, if he is on the bench we pay a percentage, if he is not in the squad then we pay a larger percentage however i doubt that this would be %100.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Absolutely no chance we pay £18k per week if he doesn't play. The average league one salary is only around £2.2k per week. 18k per week is around 16% of our turnover, and likely to be around 30% of the players wage budget.
Footballers vs. The Fans
Far more likely that we pay c£2k pw contributions to Chelsea, and that we don't pay it if he plays.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Footballers vs. The Fans
Far more likely that we pay c£2k pw contributions to Chelsea, and that we don't pay it if he plays.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
mark82
Super Moderator
Exactly. It's likely we are paying a contribution (or bigger contribution) if he doesn't play, this is fairly common practice, but it will be nowhere near 18k.
rob9872
Well-Known Member
So if a player has a bad attitude or is out of form, injured, suspended it costs us more? I do hope that never comes into a mangers thinking when selecting a team/squad.
mark82
Super Moderator
I doubt it as the contribution will be budgeted for and in line with our pay scale (you'd hope).
mark82
Super Moderator
From the too clubs perspective they will naturally want to incentivise their youngsters playing.
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
There’s more chance of Grendel purchasing a Biamou 9 shirt than this being true
Esoterica
Well-Known Member
Would give him something else to wipe his arse on instead of Tony's annual wage though.
