Match Thread Southend United vs. Coventry City Match Thread - Saturday 15th Feb (3 Viewers)

no_loyalty · Feb 12, 2020

It's about time we bumped up the goal difference a bit.

Godden to start this one.

Southend 0 City 4

Monners · Feb 12, 2020

I agree with Godden starting - two up front. I predict a win (there - I’ve said it).

Sort of agree with a couple of changes to rest players, but there is always a risk in that approach.
Tell you what; I will let Robins decide

itsabuzzard · Feb 12, 2020

Philosorapter said:

A thing of beauty.

Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk

wingy · Feb 12, 2020

Do we think we're capable of approaching this game in a ruthless manner without starting Godden?
Because if we can then I would further rest him , for some of the more challenging up coming games .
Is this a game to try something different from the start and go two up top.
Given the State of the opposition I'd think our other two strikers should get the job done.
Is this reckless heresy?
Think I'll defer to Mark .

Monners · Feb 12, 2020

I take your point Wingy. And I agree - let’s defer to King Mark

speedie87 · Feb 12, 2020

No way would I be changing to two up top, it’s working fine as it is

Monners · Feb 12, 2020

speedie87 said:
No way would I be changing to two up top, it’s working fine as it is

It is indeed - I think I’m getting over excited!

Ricketts · Feb 12, 2020

When we went two up front yesterday, Portmouth did become more of a threat as they had more midfield possesion.

Luckily it was only us lulling them into a false sense, so we could kick the ball in their net.

In Robins we trust.

PUSB

Londonccfcfan · Feb 12, 2020

itsabuzzard said:
A thing of beauty.

Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk

It is if you know how to decipher it.

clint van damme · Feb 12, 2020

unless whatever injury he was carrying prevents him playing 90 minutes Godden has to start.
Said in another thread I'd like to rest Kelly but the conundrum is who replaces him?
Other than that, same again.

Philosoraptor · Feb 12, 2020

Two good questions here about rating deviation.

Liquid Gold said:
It says best 1690 on 11th Feb but I can clearly see around 12 games we were in the 1700s.

The ratings up to game 12 were in provisional mode. There needs to be a certain amount of games before the ratings can be considered a true reflection and somewhere near a teams actual rating. The provisional mode length for chess is 20 games but that would be unworkable in this framework, so I cut it to 12 games at the start of last season. The more games played the more the ratings can be considered a true reflection of a teams playing strength and the more stable the rating becomes.

There needs to be a certain amount of games played before the ratings can be considered viable.

wingy said:
Bloody hell I've only just realised the win , draw,lose values are variable match by match. Thought they were just some prescribed norm .
What is it then that determines them ?

The variables which determines them are based on previous results.

An overview of the system can be found below with accompanying papers

FIDE meeting 9-12 April, Warsaw – Stewart Reuben – English Chess Federation

And also the main paper.

http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/research/glicko.pdf

Hope this helps.

Just a note though. This is way beyond my understanding.

Also the two points per game thing.

In provisional mode we were hitting two points a game and it was noticeable on the graph.

We are close to that now again, and it seems we are getting to the same level in the ratings (graph) again.

Spooky.

bradwellskyblues · Feb 12, 2020

think the weather may play a part high winds and heavy rain could be a bit of a leveller

Ricketts · Feb 12, 2020

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
You know, Robbings?

Writes that translantic tripe. my wife likes it. After a hard day slaving under the hairdryer she needs to unwind with a few aimless thrills.

cc84cov · Feb 12, 2020

bradwellskyblues said:
think the weather may play a part high winds and heavy rain could be a bit of a leveller

Hopefully that weather doesn’t come

Tommo72 · Feb 12, 2020

Approx 1400 sold as of this morning

Weather wise looks to be more of a wind issues than rain so expect the game will go ahead.

Team - same again for me.

Warwickhunt · Feb 12, 2020

Tommo72 said:
Approx 1400 sold as of this morning

Weather wise looks to be more of a wind issues than rain so expect the game will go ahead.

Team - same again for me.

so we have to play it on the deck then! think that suits us more than Southend?

BackRoomRummermill · Feb 12, 2020

A nailed on shock loss to burst our bubble

Ha got you ! 4 nil to Cov

covcity4life · Feb 12, 2020

Same team

3-1 win

BackRoomRummermill · Feb 12, 2020

covcity4life said:
Same team

3-1 win

you are so defeatist how will they score a goal with our Goalie in the nets

covcity4life · Feb 12, 2020

BackRoomRummermill said:
you are so defeatist how will they score a goal with our Goalie in the nets

Ok ok i admit it. I ordered the taxi!

Warwickhunt · Feb 12, 2020

We Coventry fans are all the same been so dissapointed for so long that we just sit and wait for it to go tits up! However I think we have got something going in the dressing room and the players are totally united, long may it last it should see us over the line. Lets not panic at losing one or two games

BackRoomRummermill · Feb 12, 2020

Warwickhunt said:
We Coventry fans are all the same been so dissapointed for so long that we just sit and wait for it to go tits up! However I think we have got something going in the dressing room and the players are totally united, long may it last it should see us over the line. Lets not panic at losing one or two games

Hope so

Johhny Blue · Feb 12, 2020

Liquid Gold said:
Put 3 past them in the first 15 then relax.

Why relax? We need the goal difference

Johhny Blue · Feb 12, 2020

Ricketts said:
We should be able to put 5 past these. Can't see us conceding any goals again this season, maybe one against Rotherham.

0-5.

FFS McFaz

theferret · Feb 12, 2020

Sounds like a good time to play them. They've had some good results recently, including the draw with Rotherham, but sounds like they've got some major injury problems.

Will be surprised if this goes ahead though. Forecast is for winds at least as strong as Sunday. Can see a lot of games called off for safety reasons even without the heavy rain.

Johhny Blue · Feb 12, 2020

Liquid Gold said:
In Cornwall for Rochdale, have to wait till Rotherham

You could use a map.

Johhny Blue · Feb 12, 2020

A draw would be a good result

AFCCOVENTRY · Feb 12, 2020

At least the players will finally have a week to recover before llll after Southend.

MatthewWallis · Feb 12, 2020

They’ve conceded a pathetic amount of goals this season, this has to be a convincing win for us

Mucca Mad Boys · Feb 12, 2020

This has got to be a win, no negotiation on that. Ideally, a convincing win to strengthen our goal difference.

Probably will keep the same starting team, but it’s worth playing two strikers to really stick the knife in. Baka and Gooden if they’re both fit.

Johnnythespider · Feb 12, 2020

Philosorapter said:

What are you going to do when that squiggly black line breaks through the top of the chart

cc84cov · Feb 12, 2020

Mucca Mad Boys said:
This has got to be a win, no negotiation on that. Ideally, a convincing win to strengthen our goal difference.

Probably will keep the same starting team, but it’s worth playing two strikers to really stick the knife in. Baka and Gooden if they’re both fit.

Godden should have a field day...

In theory

Johhny Blue · Feb 12, 2020

Johnnythespider said:
What are you going to do when that squiggly black line breaks through the top of the chart

We need a bigger boat

Irish Sky Blue · Feb 12, 2020

After watching us at Bolton and MK away where we dominated but couldn't score I would be very happy if it is 1-0 to us.

Ibby · Feb 12, 2020

Away win..

Match Thread Southend United vs. Coventry City Match Thread - Saturday 15th Feb (3 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency