Skybluekyle
Well-Known Member
Sub judice rule, ongoing court case, long standing convention so as not to be seen as potentially influencing the caseApparently it's not allowed to be discussed in parliament either?
Sub judice rule, ongoing court case, long standing convention so as not to be seen as potentially influencing the caseApparently it's not allowed to be discussed in parliament either?
Where?There are a lot of rumours floating around about Starmer as well...
Think most were involved from one side and then a generation most from the other sideI can say something as I will not have the Old Bill knocking on my door at 4 am.
Seems the father was up to his what’s it’s in the Rwandan Genocide and Kier was involved in making sure he was not returned to face justice.
Time and time and time again your claims/facts have been entirely discredited. Information source?I can say something as I will not have the Old Bill knocking on my door at 4 am.
Seems the father was up to his what’s it’s in the Rwandan Genocide and Kier was involved in making sure he was not returned to face justice.
Yeah we need evidenceTime and time and time again your claims/facts have been entirely discredited. Information source?
what do you mean by seems as I can't find any evidence for this? we know the name of the person arrested in Southport and from that its not exactly hard to get his fathers name.Seems the father was up to his what’s it’s in the Rwandan Genocide and Kier was involved in making sure he was not returned to face justice.
Time and time and time again your claims/facts have been entirely discredited. Information source?
what do you mean by seems as I can't find any evidence for this? we know the name of the person arrested in Southport and from that its not exactly hard to get his fathers name.
there seems to be two theories floating around on social media. one being from that reliable source of information Lawrence Fox who posted a court documents 'proving' that the father was involved in the genocide expect if anyone actually read the document rather than taking his word for it the only person from Rwanda it mentions is a woman, the males are an Iranian man accused of converting to Christianity; an Angolan army officer accused of spying and a second Angolan whose family was killed after he opposed the government.
the other theory seems to be that his father came here the year trials in Rwanda started and if you go down that route you believe that for some unknown reason the government decided to move him here and change his identity but they did it so badly they forgot to change his surname, oh and the the years don't match up.
He’s a nice bloke, well informed, finger on the pulse.Keith492651 on Twitter