They need to speak to the man on the street. We all know it came from the door handle.BREAKING: British scientists CAN'T PROVE Russia was behind Sergei Skripal poisoning
Porton Down, Britain's leading chemical weapons research institution, has not been able to conclusively prove that Russia was to blame for the poisoning of Skripal, 66, and Yulia, 33.
Prime Minister Theresa May has repeatedly insisted that Russia was “highly likely” to be responsible for the attack in Salisbury on March 4.
But Gary Aitkenhead, chief executive of Porton Down's Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), has thrown the certainly of her assertions into doubt.
His team at Porton Down, whose analysis of the nerve agent has been crucial to Britain's case, hasn't been able to figure out where the lethal chemical, called Novichok, came from.
They need to speak to the man on the street. We all know it came from the door handle.
Beeb are reporting the same thing too.
One step ahead, TGP. I have had every door in the house removed and replaced them with these.View attachment 9394
You used to run a brothel?My word that takes me back
You used to run a brothel?
Yep, that's me. Nobcheese Pete.That’s where I know you from
Beeb are reporting the same thing too.
Yep, that's me. Nobcheese Pete.
Experts CANNOT confirm nerve agent used to poison spy was from Russia | Daily Mail OnlineQuality source there I see - has this been reported anywhere but that comic?
Experts CANNOT confirm nerve agent used to poison spy was from Russia | Daily Mail Online
Porton Down experts unable to identify 'precise source' of novichok that poisoned spy
Source of nerve agent 'not identified '
Porton Down experts NOT able to prove Salisbury nerve agent was Russia made
Porton Down experts unable to verify 'precise source of novichok'
Porton Down Laboratory Unable To Identify 'Precise Source' Of Nerve Agent That Poisoned Spy
Salisbury nerve agent 'probably state made' but Porton Down scientists unable to say it came from Russia
Yes Sky etc!Quality source there I see - has this been reported anywhere but that comic?
Only inteligence 'Suggest' it is Russia .Which all pretty much confirm if was Russia
Not sure I'd want you on the jury of a murder trial, Grendel.Which all pretty much confirm if was Russia
Only inteligence 'Suggest' it is Russia .
There apparently is no known antidote.
I really have to say it's pretty incredible that the intrusive British press haven't managed a photo call or tv interview with the recovering Yulia.
The confidential meetings in the Hague tommorow are going to bring a bit more focus on our inteligence input.
Not sure I'd want you on the jury of a murder trial, Grendel.
It makes you wonder if JC made the right call before getting taken apart in the press
I don't.This isn’t a trial is it. There will be a lot of discussion behind closed doors with other countries and their responses show all you need to know.
No doubt you also doubt Litvenko was assassinated by a Soviet Agent
Completely contradicting Boris who stated that a top scientist at Porton Down had confirmed to him it was from Russia, he's either lying or even dimmer than I've given him credit for. If the rest of the world has based it's decision to expel Russian diplomats on Boris's information we are the laughing stock of the world.Quality source there I see - has this been reported anywhere but that comic?
I don't.
Don't think you can go around though saying stuff like 'highly likely.'
My missus watches Russian TV all day and they are doing nothing but laugh as us at the moment.
I too think it was the Russians, but where's the proof? Can you actually act on something without certainty?
It makes you wonder if JC made the right call before getting taken apart in the press
He’s certainly no statesman. A statesman would have collated all the relevant evidence and then acted on facts instead of some knee jerk phoney show of “strength”.Completely contradicting Boris who stated that a top scientist at Porton Down had confirmed to him it was from Russia, he's either lying or even dimmer than I've given him credit for. If the rest of the world has based it's decision to expel Russian diplomats on Boris's information we are the laughing stock of the world.
View attachment 9395
I heard a scientist on the radio saying that they can pinpoint where the potassium comes from according to isotopes. Each area in the world where potassium is found is different. If that is so, they must now know where it originated from. I can’t help thinking we’ve been set up.
Haha you pair are making me reminice and chuckle.I am sure they had them at come local shops in the 80’s like the vg and my neighbours had them when I was a little boy
The Russians of course will laugh because Putin needs to demonstrate some strength and power and these sort of rather pointless acts of criminality are the only way he can do so.
Daft analogy. DNA evidence proved Huntley was guilty. Lots of forensic evidence such as the fibres from the girls' Man U tops being on nis clothing.There was two way transfer of fibres that proved significant physical contact between Huntley and the girls. Lots of evidence.What proof would you want?
The Russians of course will laugh because Putin needs to demonstrate some strength and power and these sort of rather pointless acts of criminality are the only way he can do so.
I do find this amusing though as you once said Ken Livingstone was not a supporter of hitter as he said he wasn’t.
Talking about murder trials on that basis were you one of those who didn’t find Ian Huntley guilty. After all he can’t be - Ian said he didn’t do it.
Last I read Putin was miles ahead in the polls whereas May is clinging to power by her fingernails. If anybody needs a demonstration of power it's May.
Was the response of the global community based on supposition and presumed facts sold to them by Boris and May or actual facts?No he clearly didn’t as the response of the global community proved. That one single act actually is what proved him unfit for leadership.
Well it’s fooled the whole of Europe then hasn’t it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?