Squad Numbers (1 Viewer)

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member

Seb

Well-Known Member
It's the same as his squad number from last season, so I would say no, interesting that Reid and Turnbull have numbers tho.
Its like Haynes, hes kept 24 so maybe they just like that number and robins has let them keep them
 

Nick

Administrator
Sayoud is a strange one, is he actually a real life player as he doesn't seem to be anywhere near yet.
 

MatthewWallis

Well-Known Member
It's the same as his squad number from last season, so I would say no, interesting that Reid and Turnbull have numbers tho.

But they've both gone to quite high numbers. I'd expect both of them to be gone or not feature much at all
 

Cavan O'Doherty

Well-Known Member
Hopefully the filling of the number 9 doesn't mean no more strikers. 12 has probably been reserved for Moorhouse? Wonder which number Pearson will wear if he signs.
 

Nick

Administrator
Reid and Turnbull being shunted from starting 11 numbers to high 20s and up is suggestive. Stuart Beavon's name has a full stop at the end, that's doing my head in.

Ha was just about to point that out, what's that code for?
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
Also interesting to see Burge as #1 - I had felt that O'Brien would be first choice (not that squad numbers mean as much as they used to - RCC was number 1 for most of TM's time whilst Burge still had #1 as his understudy)
 

Lord_Nampil

Well-Known Member
Telegraph got it wrong again?? Seems they started at 1 and ran out of numbers rather than missing the few out in the middle!!
 

BigadamL

Well-Known Member
Turnbull and Reid suggests that if they stay they can be part of MR plans, or is it because they are under contract unlike Thomas?
 

steve82

Well-Known Member
The no9 shirt is a big one for me, suggests he's very happy with Biamou and don't have a more experienced striker in line currently on his target list.

I'm not saying no more strikers will arrive tho. I do hope we get a natural proven target man tho with Moorhouse too.
That will give us a full compliment of striking options
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
But they've both gone to quite high numbers. I'd expect both of them to be gone or not feature much at all

Turnbull has 6 days and counting to seal a move under his own powers or then it becomes an opportunity for CCFC to require a fee for him.

If Turnbull doesn't leave I can see him being apart of the squad, same with Reid.
 

Nick

Administrator
Turnbull has 6 days and counting to seal a move under his own powers or then it becomes an opportunity for CCFC to require a fee for him.

If Turnbull doesn't leave I can see him being apart of the squad, same with Reid.

It's been quiet about him having talks, haven't seen the usual rumours of other fans either saying he is in talks with them.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't read too much into the squad numbers. Don't think this generation of players are really bothered about 1-11.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
It's been quiet about him having talks, haven't seen the usual rumours of other fans either saying he is in talks with them.

It's been very quiet, I would imagine that if anything is to be done it will be closer to the 31 July.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Reckon we could line-up 1-11 on the opening day which must be a rare occurrence these days in football?

Burge

Grimmer
Willis
McDonald
Stokes

Doyle
Kelly

Vincenti
McNulty
Jones

Biamou
Thought that myself, like it as well. Squad Numbers are another pointless Americanism with purely commercial objectives

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
Moorhouse did not get a number. He looks very useful, I hope we sign him.
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
I wonder what number Baker will be given?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top