Factual evidence required with a true extract from the meeting of Richardson and CCC about buying the Ricoh!...... Impasse I believe!
Factual evidence required with a true extract from the meeting of Richardson and CCC about buying the Ricoh!...... Impasse I believe!
I assume you are referring to thisIt is a quote from the Telegraph and I would say that they had researched enough to avoid being charged with Libel/slander from CCC. BTW it looked very much like a "Flounce" to me.
Ah I see you wont because I can't - interesting approach
What I don't get is, if it is limited to Rugby only...Why on earth would they try to add something to stop football??
Errrrmmm It seems I'm the only one researching here. Get your proof pal, I'm still waiting!
What I don't get is, if it is limited to Rugby only...Why on earth would they try to add something to stop football??
One more time, just for the lazy fuck that you are.... The restriction was put in place in 2010(Check it out) to protect CRFC when coming out of liquidation.
So what you're saying then SBK is that the original restriction allowed for ‘leisure and sporting activities’. You could certainly argue CCFC playing there came under sporting activities. That will explain then why, as soon as the club started to explore a move to the Butts, the council moved to get the restriction changed to explicitly forbid professional football.“This lease permits the ground to be used as a rugby football club and pitch and for other ‘leisure and sporting activities’.
Tell me something.... Do you ever have a contract which you have to sign,(Sky TV/Mortgage etc) then, lets say 18 months later you receive a letter from that company saying your rental/interest rate has gone up to y from x. What would you call this?..... Perhaps, "Protecting your interests" Now having the ownership of the Freehold to BPA. and having done business in the past/still ongoing with SISU in which, up till now have had a JR kicked out of court three times. wouldn't you be inclined to do the same thing? It's called making your case "Watertight"
Yes, and then you either phone up and get a discount or leave. Not sure what you're point is here.Do you ever have a contract which you have to sign,(Sky TV/Mortgage etc) then, lets say 18 months later you receive a letter from that company saying your rental/interest rate has gone up to y from x
So they were blocking the club from any chance of going to the Butts then? The same thing that you have been going mental about for hours saying they didn't?
Didn't CCC say it was a "Fishing exercise" to gleen information?... Oh wait a minute. Isn't that what SISU did a couple of years ago by offering to buy the Ricoh but with proviso's installed when they new Wasps had made an offer to buy without "Any strings attached"? Wasn't that to "Gleen information" to add bullets against CCC in the JR? Double standards" spring to mind guys?
Are you talking about the offer to buy Higgs share after Wasps had purchased the councils share? The 'strings' were that the deal was independently checked as Wasps had access to ACL information that hadn't been made available to others.Isn't that what SISU did a couple of years ago by offering to buy the Ricoh but with proviso's installed when they new Wasps had made an offer to buy without "Any strings attached"?
What are you going off about now? Where are you trying to take it?
You just said they did it to protect their interests because of SISU and court cases? So indicates they purposely did it to prevent CCFC from being able to move there, which is the point you have been arguing against.
Still, you can get proven wrong and move onto the next point.
Are you talking about the offer to buy Higgs share after Wasps had purchased the councils share? The 'strings' were that the deal was independently checked as Wasps had access to ACL information that hadn't been made available to others.
Are you talking about the offer to buy Higgs share after Wasps had purchased the councils share? The 'strings' were that the deal was independently checked as Wasps had access to ACL information that hadn't been made available to others.
The point is numbnuts, the condition was already in place(2010) it was as has already been stated a "Fishing exercise" As for getting "Proven wrong" and moving on to the next point.... I'm still waiting for proof(From the original argument about Wasps and CCC secretly meeting about buying the Ricoh) Remember???
Council QC said the council produced a financial forecast to see if ACL could service the council loan without any rent from the football club.
He said another factor to consider was that the tenancy of Wasps had been waiting in the wings for “some time”.
Justice Treacy asks for evidence to show Wasps was in the wings at the time of the loan.
Sisu QC says the document with reference to this was from March 2012.
Council QC admits he may have been overdoing it to say it was “in the wings”, “but certainly it had been mentioned”.
And the community stuff remember..
Not to mention it was already a done deal to Wasps for 100%.
I'm still waiting for the proof Nick.... "Put up or shut up" All you ever do is a Grenduffy... Always answering questions with a question. you're just a troll, Ironic really that you own the forum. I think your ambition in life is to cause shitfests, then keep "Stoking the fire" ,Fair play mate you're the fucking undisputed King at that:finger:
it was as has already been stated a "Fishing exercise"
Hope you're all reading this.... I apologise. Like I said If I'm wrong I will "Man up" Awaiting the time one of you are wrong. Lets see if you lot can "Man up"
The "fishing exercise" statement only came about after there was an outcry (at least there was on here) about the attempt to block CCFC playing at the Butts. I believe that the timing of that statement was because it was an "arse covering" exercise.
I think it coincided with the lawyers telling them there were no grounds for enforce a restrictive covenant on the transfer
Hope you're all reading this.... I apologise. Like I said If I'm wrong I will "Man up" Awaiting the time one of you are wrong. Lets see if you lot can "Man up"
Is that when Millerchip got a phone call?
We all understand that and accept your view and right to opinion.
However, you must also accept that some people may also be right but cannot just pull documents etc out of a file to post on here. If I wanted to lie about something it would not be if a WASP said something in 2012 or 2013 or 2014.
I would say I had a Chinese Investor waiting in the wings to buy the whole sheebang including WASPS
Now lighten up and move on
Hope you're all reading this.... I apologise. Like I said If I'm wrong I will "Man up" Awaiting the time one of you are wrong. Lets see if you lot can "Man up"
Is that really you?Lmfao. good one isn't it hahahaha
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?