Otis
Well-Known Member
Been a few threads and posts these past few weeks about how stay away fans will be starving the club of money and how much it will hurt CCFC.
Been thinking about this and going over stuff that has been said in my mind.
A few things jump out at me.
1. I recall CWR saying that the club were budgeting for crowds of less than 2,000 at Sixfields. The club were expecting very low attendances.
2. Sisu say they are in this for the long haul and it being a 10 year plan. They say they are going nowhere.
3. They say they ARE building a new stadium and it will happen.
4. They say they are prepared to take the financial hit for the 3 years or whatever until we build the new ground and they will give CCFC the financial backing.
Now, this is what's bugging me.
How are we starving the club when the owners have already budgeted for the crowds they pretty much know they are going to get?
They have known how low the crowds are going to be, they have said they will take the financial hit and they have said that they will build the new stadium anyway. How therefore are any of the boycotters putting the club at risk, when everything has already been planned and decided and the owners knew the fans feelings before they went ahead with the groundshare?
Sisu say they have a plan and everything is geared up to this plan and they will carry it through.
If they are going to do it anyway and say they will fund the club for 3 years then I don't see how anyone is putting the club at any risk here by not going.
Been thinking about this and going over stuff that has been said in my mind.
A few things jump out at me.
1. I recall CWR saying that the club were budgeting for crowds of less than 2,000 at Sixfields. The club were expecting very low attendances.
2. Sisu say they are in this for the long haul and it being a 10 year plan. They say they are going nowhere.
3. They say they ARE building a new stadium and it will happen.
4. They say they are prepared to take the financial hit for the 3 years or whatever until we build the new ground and they will give CCFC the financial backing.
Now, this is what's bugging me.
How are we starving the club when the owners have already budgeted for the crowds they pretty much know they are going to get?
They have known how low the crowds are going to be, they have said they will take the financial hit and they have said that they will build the new stadium anyway. How therefore are any of the boycotters putting the club at risk, when everything has already been planned and decided and the owners knew the fans feelings before they went ahead with the groundshare?
Sisu say they have a plan and everything is geared up to this plan and they will carry it through.
If they are going to do it anyway and say they will fund the club for 3 years then I don't see how anyone is putting the club at any risk here by not going.