I can't believe anyone would think that Elliott should have started in front of McGoldrick for the Shrewsbury game. Yes, he played well at MK, but he was knackered after 60 minutes and had to be subbed, AND if McGoldrick hadn't played and Elliott had started, and we still lost, then even Robins biggest supporters would have questioned his judgement.
And for the poster who says Clarke's 2 goals have been easy, then consider Elliott's first at MK, which he nearly messed up, yesterday's was hardly a super-strike, and he contrived to miss a point-blank header where there should have been absolutely no doubt whether it crossed the line.
I wish everyone would get off Clarke's back and give him a chance to get used to our system. Elliott is a very good option to have on the bench as an impact sub when defences are getting tired. So, in answer to the question, start Clarke at PNE (and of course, cancel his contract if he doesn't score.....)