Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Semi related. Was there ever an explanation as to how the women managed to get get an attendance record above the stadium capacity?
Semi related. Was there ever an explanation as to how the women managed to get get an attendance record above the stadium capacity?31,400 was the attendance.
Semi related. Was there ever an explanation as to how the women managed to get get an attendance record above the stadium capacity?
In what sense, and how did that impact on the dynamic between the pair of them?Things they’d not yet talked about
under Coleman there was half a season when the home fans were behind that goal, and the away fans were pushed into the cornerRegards the away concourse, there has been the odd occasion when home and away fans have been situated behind the ‘away’ goal
Namely Crewe in the JPT / a community day a few years ago.
So it can be done, albeit it may not be easy
Always amazes me how many people just accept ‘sorry police said no’.Shame the police limiting the end to 5000.
That's 1000 - 1500 tickets unsold at £33 for the Birmingham, West Brom and Sunderland games.
Equally next season Everton/West Ham/Leicester/Leeds/Sheffield Wednesday would sell it too depending on who's up/down.
under Coleman there was half a season when the home fans were behind that goal, and the away fans were pushed into the corner
Whilst we are under- capacity, that doesnt make financial sense, but if we ever got to the PL, there is no reason why they could not to that again - That concourse can be split in 2 like it has before
Always amazes me how many people just accept ‘sorry police said no’.
The police don’t have the power to say what the capacity of our stadium should be.
They may have an input within the SAG but they need to justify that and the club can challenge any decision that’s made that could affect its business and it’s income. What are they expecting to happen with 6000 that won’t happen with 5000?
I guess while games aren’t selling out it isn’t an issue.
No one just accepts it. With increased numbers comes increased risk. I did ask is it because they will charge more or genuine riskAlways amazes me how many people just accept ‘sorry police said no’.
The police don’t have the power to say what the capacity of our stadium should be.
They may have an input within the SAG but they need to justify that and the club can challenge any decision that’s made that could affect its business and it’s income. What are they expecting to happen with 6000 that won’t happen with 5000?
I guess while games aren’t selling out it isn’t an issue.
No one just accepts it. With increased numbers comes increased risk. I did ask is it because they will charge more or genuine risk
The answer was it’s not about cost.
If you genuinely think the club just lies and twists information to suit their purposes when it means they lose potential revenue then I don’t suspect what anyone will say on the matter will ever change your opinion
They may know slightly more than you one would suspect. From memory crewe fans were in block 1 in the main stand weren’t they and so city fans were all behind the goal. Don’t know about mixing in the concourse. Seemed like a genuinely reasonable argument to me. Opinions are fun evidence based challenge is more fun. Give me to the proof of your assertion and I’ll follow it upArguably, Boddy and King don't have a clue about the concourse/ground set up because they weren't here when it's been done in the past.
Db kept saying sag don’t make this decision as it’s about numbers and not safetyStage entire problem with the SAG is that they’re way too risk averse, so we’ve already mitigated any increase in risk and then some. Someone needs to make the argument for a clear headed assessment of policy impact from a data driven perspective instead of a room of people coming up with scary stories.
Sorry, just read the questions. Most seem to be for the benefit of the individual supporters clubs rather than the wider ccfc fans. Appreciate they're serving their members, but makes them appear insular and thinking about 'what's in it for me' attitude.
Handing over questionsIn what sense, and how did that impact on the dynamic between the pair of them?
Bizarre yep. Not sure a terms of reference has ever been agreedI think the questions raised from Skybluestalk and CCLSC were actually reasonable, valid questions, but yeah some of the questions raised by other groups are just bizarre...
Like those Corporate Members queries or wasting a question on a hypothetical Wembley situation
Handing over questions
Dk questioning micro level details but also not being aware of capacity and concourse stuff
It’s only an observation.
It was quite tricky to read signals attempting to chair and take notes - love how people want to come and air their views but can’t be arsed to do anything to help
This is a strange comment when I've asked a question based on something you said.- love how people want to come and air their views but can’t be arsed to do anything to help
They may know slightly more than you one would suspect. From memory crewe fans were in block 1 in the main stand weren’t they and so city fans were all behind the goal. Don’t know about mixing in the concourse. Seemed like a genuinely reasonable argument to me. Opinions are fun evidence based challenge is more fun. Give me to the proof of your assertion and I’ll follow it up
Becomes an issue when it’s full
Fact is the fans on both sides who behaved like twats at the derby game caused decisions to be made to close the block
Let someone else do your job then.love how people want to come and air their views but can’t be arsed to do anything to help
Let someone else do your job then.
Tbf they'd be along the lines of when Miley Cyrus was leading the team out with a singalongNeither of my questions were asked anyway.
Tbf they'd be along the lines of when Miley Cyrus was leading the team out with a singalong
Tbf they'd be along the lines of when Miley Cyrus was leading the team out with a singalong
What help does he want then?he asked for help not a reposition
I would say that if having to listen to fans who want to “air their views” (or in this case, ask a question) but don’t want to help out is something that bothers you, maybe being a fan rep isn’t your ideal job.he asked for help not a reposition. as far as I can see Pete is the only one who's engaging with the club. should be appreciated
Sorry wasn’t whinging at anyone on here but at the forum with the clubLet someone else do your job then.
AgreedBoddy is the CEO - surely he's aware of all of the relevant information pertaining to how he might best commercially exploit the stadium.
Sorry my friendThis is a strange comment when I've asked a question based on something you said.
Which were they, were they serious ones?Neither of my questions were asked anyway.
Which were they, were they serious ones?
It was more a reflectionhe asked for help not a reposition. as far as I can see Pete is the only one who's engaging with the club. should be appreciated
Ah no they were serious sorryyeah but I guess the club can’t do anything about the toilets and the women’s team has probably been answered a million times.
Ah no they were serious sorry
I’ll go back about the womens team I think you’re wrong about the toilets
Ok, well next forum's question is whether the club is happy for reps to offer their interpretation of these meetings without it affecting access.Sorry my friend
Was about the meeting itself no one on here
Everyone in here (some exceptions some of the time) engages and makes the effort and have done their own representing and asking and challenging as I know you have
Am trying to work out the full reply to you on a public forum where I know the club are looking
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?