italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Your dwelling on stuff in the past. That will come out in time but our situation will not change from it.
It's the future we want to know about.
I don't know if I could do both and sweep stuff other parties have done under the carpet at the same time?
Not possible, the planning regulations must be followed, they can object but reasons must be provided & it would be possible to appeal, up to the secretary of state, as in fact the guy who wanted to develop Baginton Airport did, but the fat boy rejected it. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-31454138
Your dwelling on stuff in the past. That will come out in time but our situation will not change from it.
It's the future we want to know about.
I take it if we dont dwell on the past you would welcome forgiveness of SISU for all their misdeeds then and to forget about it all?
I can forgive anybody including Sisu, but they need to win my trust back.
If they sack that arrogant Tim Fisher that would be a good start.
I can forgive anybody including Sisu, but they need to win my trust back.
If they sack that arrogant Tim Fisher that would be a good start.
I can forgive anybody including Sisu, but they need to win my trust back.
If they sack that arrogant Tim Fisher that would be a good start.
It is possible, they have the power to accept or reject, based on the planning application and planning regs. Which is exactly what I said, and what you have said. One in layman's terms, one more specific. When I said veto, I did mean according to Planning regs.
Having worked in planning a number of years ago, I am aware of how the system works.
veto
noun: veto; plural noun: vetoes
- 1. a constitutional right to reject a decision or proposal made by a lawmaking body.
"neither state was given a veto over amendments to the Act"
I can forgive anybody including Sisu, but they need to win my trust back.
If they sack that arrogant Tim Fisher that would be a good start.
No you implied that the local authority could override planning regs, they can't.
Amen.
Tony officially one of Italias disciples..
No I didnt.
I was referring to the right of the council to turn down a planning application, based on the advice of the Planning department.
If you want to be petty and small minded to try to prove a point, regarding my choice of words then well done I hope you feel better.
Tony officially one of Italias disciples..
You think? In other words made up bollocks.
Why do you have a picture of Anne Lucas as your Avatar?
Don't think I was being petty at all, merely making a point, this is being petty & small minded..
See the difference?
You get a two week break and this happens
Hope it's not postponed or we could have complete meltdownThe game cant come quick enough
Hope it's not postponed or we could have complete meltdown
Don't think I was being petty at all, merely making a point, this is being petty & small minded..
See the difference?
Yep. I see a difference. I see one poster defending he club and the other slavishly towing the council line.
Don't be too offended about the Lucas remark. No amount of air brushing would make her look that good.
Who is defending our club?
You don't defend our club. You just attack CCC. You defended Richardson after everything he has done to our club and us. That tells me that you are more interested in attacking CCC than what is best for CCFC.
Who is defending our club?
You don't defend our club. You just attack CCC. You defended Richardson after everything he has done to our club and us. That tells me that you are more interested in attacking CCC than what is best for CCFC.
A number of posters defend the club and I consider myself one of them. It comes across as though some want the club to simply roll over and be treated second rate.
The club's long-term future has been under threat by both sisu's long term management and behaviour from from the other parties.
Sisu are going to be gone one day but being a tenant to an out of town rugby club for potentially the foreseeable future isn't.
Why accept their attempts at making us the 2nd team in city and complete disregard for the city's current rugby team? Any reasonable supporter should never accept that.
We are the biggest club in the city and always will be buthe it's naive to accept a franchise come in and to take that away? They are probably annoyed we are doing so well as it further diminishes their chances of picking up support and attention.
Your obsession with Richardson is just odd. Are you on some kind of bet that you mention him in every thread?
I wonder how many people think it is odd that you defend Richardsons actions that put our football club in so much debt and sold our ground.
Less than you want judging by the thread we had on the topic
Like it or not we would be better off if he'd stayed and robinsons puppet had not been appointed.
You even tried to defend him on this thread.
Yes CCC have acted like a bunch of cunts. And SISU have been no better. But both only got involved because of Richardsons actions. We were at least 30m in debt and losing at least 1/2m a month when he sold HR. Yet you try and say he is innocent of all charges.
A number of posters defend the club and I consider myself one of them. It comes across as though some want the club to simply roll over and be treated second rate.
The club's long-term future has been under threat by both sisu's long term management and behaviour from from the other parties.
Sisu are going to be gone one day but being a tenant to an out of town rugby club for potentially the foreseeable future isn't.
Why accept their attempts at making us the 2nd team in city and complete disregard for the city's current rugby team? Any reasonable supporter should never accept that.
We are the biggest club in the city and always will be buthe it's naive to accept a franchise come in and to take that away? They are probably annoyed we are doing so well as it further diminishes their chances of picking up support and attention.
Slagging off Wasps and CCC, will make us feel better,
No I'm saying if he'd stayed we would have been debt free at a stroke and either still at Highfield Road or at the Ricoh with us in the driving seat.
If you have the courage of your convictions do a poll -.who was better for the club Bryan Richardson or Mike Mcginity and see what the outcome is.
You previously have said that our problems are not the fault of Richardson. He started our downfall and every one that has followed him has been firefighting without any water.
Try a poll then. Add everyone who could be seen as liable for what has happened to our club. I would be very surprised if there was enough CCC or SISU haters that wouldn't know what has gone on.
Ooh this thread's still going.
We are blessed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?