I think that as a group on here we are now pretty well qualified in several subjects.
The next time City have a position to offer - e.g. as Technical Director to replace Venus - they should offer it first on here.
What?
After doing the Accountants and law courses, you didn't then do the architects course? blimey, you must be one of the poorest qualified people on this forum....
Would love it to happen,
Knock the BP garage and the fob watch down to reroute the road,
Close the road on match days
Free tickets to residents of retirement village
From the main road you can see the pitch is elevated and could be sunk down to create a bigger stadium.
23000 is more than enough for us in the long term, plenty of teams in the prem with similar capacities
Was queing for 7 and a half hours to get Wembley tickets so had a good walk around and looked at the space available.Liberty Stadium and New Den both just over 20K. If they were serious it wouldn't be impossible I don't think.
View attachment 6845
View attachment 6846
I think that as a group on here we are now pretty well qualified in several subjects.
The next time City have a position to offer - e.g. as Technical Director to replace Venus - they should offer it first on here.
Regardless of revenues it would if possible easily be the best solution even if there were 12,000 seats in the short term.
Then people really need to target the real enemy in the city. While the insect remains in Coventry we have no future
Liberty Stadium and New Den both just over 20K. If they were serious it wouldn't be impossible I don't think.
View attachment 6845
View attachment 6846
Residents wouldn't have s choice. Power of objection these days is zero
So the deal at the Butts will be better?
Can't see how we get CRFC to finance it, then we rent it and .............. we get 365 day incomes.
People need to now ask the right questions.
No, I believe the Ricoh is the way forward. If we can get a % of revenues.
The reason I started this thread, is (at a guess) the BPA doesn't generate much revenue from conference, parties, weddings etc. This is apparently the revenue streams we need to be able to compete.
My question is: Does anyone believe the revenue streams from the BPA (regardless of capacity) be able to make CCFC compete.
My answer is no, but I don't know the figures for the BPA to make an educated guess.
No, I believe the Ricoh is the way forward. If we can get a % of revenues.
The reason I started this thread, is (at a guess) the BPA doesn't generate much revenue from conference, parties, weddings etc. This is apparently the revenue streams we need to be able to compete.
My question is: Does anyone believe the revenue streams from the BPA (regardless of capacity) be able to make CCFC compete.
My answer is no, but I don't know the figures for the BPA to make an educated guess.
Let's be honest here, The Butts is being mentioned because it's what a certain section of the fanbase wants to hear, and therefore will be more likely to be accepted. It allows the club to take the pressure off themselves for finding a ground and put it on a third party. We've seen this exact tactic a few times over the last few years and it never, ever, results in us moving towards a solution.
The question that needs answering, as it has for the last 4 years, is: what are you doing? The answer, as it has been for the last 4 years is: waiting, and stalling as much as we can.
Jon Sharp nor CRL have to show you anything!
Bollocks. Look at the court case the owners of Mildenhall stadium lost to newbies that moved into the area. It has basically bankrupted them and this was all about noise from the stadium from a house that are both in the flight path of RAF Mildenhall where military planes are allowed to take off twenty four seven 365.
No, I believe the Ricoh is the way forward. If we can get a % of revenues.
The reason I started this thread, is (at a guess) the BPA doesn't generate much revenue from conference, parties, weddings etc. This is apparently the revenue streams we need to be able to compete.
My question is: Does anyone believe the revenue streams from the BPA (regardless of capacity) be able to make CCFC compete.
My answer is no, but I don't know the figures for the BPA to make an educated guess.
52 weddings at 2 grand a time might get us a goalkeeper.No, I believe the Ricoh is the way forward. If we can get a % of revenues.
The reason I started this thread, is (at a guess) the BPA doesn't generate much revenue from conference, parties, weddings etc. This is apparently the revenue streams we need to be able to compete.
My question is: Does anyone believe the revenue streams from the BPA (regardless of capacity) be able to make CCFC compete.
My answer is no, but I don't know the figures for the BPA to make an educated guess.
52 weddings at 2 grand a time might get us a goalkeeper.
Oh and then theres Tims Tuck shop should bring in a couple of quid.
We can confirm preliminary discussions have taken place with both “CCFC” and the EFL on the possibility of the football club playing at BPA as tenants of CRL (Coventry Rugby Limited).
Yew, but never to 25,000. Coventry Rugby would never ever need such a capacity.When they bought their properties the search would show the Butts Arena has not just a lease but a Building Agreement attached to it - so it was always intended to be expanded
Also, would be a perfect place to live for those supporters who have followed City for the past 50/55/60 years.the retirement village goes right upto the railway embankment, I don't know if a literally vertical railway embankment would support the train tracks but it would either be that or get permission to build down the side of the retirement village.
I've just put my name down on the waiting list.Also, would be a perfect place to live for those supporters who have followed City for the past 50/55/60 years.
Can't really argue with anything Sharp has said. Don't think any of our supporters would want a plan that had a negative impact on the rugby club.
If this is all a smoke screen I don't get what Sharp stands to benefit by assisting Fisher / SISU?
A statement from Cov rugby’s Jon Sharp, revealed for the first time here, reads: “Following the reports of the mediation process, we at Coventry Rugby Club ( CRL ) are pleased to see some progress in attempt to bring closure to what has been a disruptive period for all parties in this city.what has he said CD? I'm will be a lot more inclined to believe there's anything to this if Sharp indicates that there is.
Annoying that Moz Baker - and therefore the Trust I presume - are already sending out negative messages about a possible groundshare. We need positivity, particularly from the main fan group. They should be talking it up, not down.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?