Every thing you list here is used by those on both sides. Yet anyone who points it out are supposed to be the biased ones
Have you seen G admit he was wrong on any occasion?
Quiz question - what’s the highest 52% or’48%?
I have pulled him up on things.Have you seen G admit he was wrong on any occasion?
I have pulled him up on things.
I can name several on here that state things as the truth but just go quiet for a bit when caught out. Or look dir something that slightly backs them up.as evidence.
So do I. That is why it gets me going whenever someone tries to rewrite history.I respect people more if they can hold their hands up when they get things wrong. I don’t think you’d even find a Tory MP who would argue they haven’t cut spending in the last 10 years. They almost wear it as a badge of honour
I have pulled him up on things.
I can name several on here that state things as the truth but just go quiet for a bit when caught out. Or look dir something that slightly backs them up.as evidence.
Oh come on. Horses love horse racing and it doesn’t matter how many fact based reports of drugging horses so they don’t die of pulmonary embolisms, or fact based evidence about them being an animal with flight instincts that run in a herd, or that they’re a sentient animal so they feel pain when being whipped you provide they just fucking love it. That’s why they keep running when the jockey falls of, none of the above is true. It’s just stuff that “slightly” backs me up as evidence. Besides, Astute found an article written by a pro racing journalist who’s scientific evidence of horse racing not being cruel is that if it was more people would be protesting at the gate when he arrives at a meeting. True story.Wow, talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
Several of us commented about it...& I saw it covered on BBC News.An article in the Mirror is a ‘barrage’?
Several of us commented about it...& I saw it covered on BBC News.
I also doubt his comments would have any positive impact for Boris & co, nor negative for Corbyn & co.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Maybe we should all shut up then?After all of this I think that Farage's priorities are quite clear from all of this and none of them have the UK at the top - the way he speaks with such authority despite never been an elected an MP is quite frankly bizarre.
Maybe we should all shut up then?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Quiz question - what’s the highest 52% or’48%?
Leave means leave. Which is why we have the leader of the unofficial leave campaign telling the leader of the official leave campaign that his leave deal isn’t leave. #weknowwhatwevotedforDepends on if the 48% is on one defined outcome and the 52% an accumulation of almost endless undefined options......
Depends on if the 48% is on one defined outcome and the 52% an accumulation of almost endless undefined options......
Ah so everyone who said yes has an identical view on Europe going forward do they? Did they in the lee koi’s referendum do you think?
So had we voted remain do you think we'd still have parliament three years on arguing over what remain meant? Or had two elections based around it? Fact is the ambiguity over leave is much much bigger than that of remain.
So do I. That is why it gets me going whenever someone tries to rewrite history.
What we need is a party that is a medium of Labour and the Tories. 'New Labour' was supposed to be this. But it ended up as the Tories in disguise. A train wreck waiting to happen.
We would still have had some trying to make out that we should have another go at it because of the lies leading up to the referendum.So had we voted remain do you think we'd still have parliament three years on arguing over what remain meant? Or had two elections based around it? Fact is the ambiguity over leave is much much bigger than that of remain.
We would still have had some trying to make out that we should have another go at it because of the lies leading up to the referendum.
If there is one thing I have learned from Brexit it is the word 'leave has several meanings. If you are leaving something you need to put a full description in or nobody will know what it means.
Next time I leave my house I will try the window instead of the door :smuggrin:As has been pointed out before it's fine if you don't care where you go. If you do you need a destination.
Or look dir something that slightly backs them up.as evidence.
Like quoting Gs racist posts back to him?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe it was you putting words into the mouth of Juncker.they weren’t my posts a mere reflection of the EU leaders views
they weren’t my posts a mere reflection of the EU leaders views
Except they weren’t all that were they?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Apart from they were your own direct quotes.they weren’t my posts a mere reflection of the EU leaders views
Apart from they were your own direct quotes.
No they were statements to invoke an outraged response and then when the quotation was displayed we could see the toe curling retreat
In reality you’d made similar statements to the ones you tried to use against Juncker - the two of you would probably get on well.
No they were statements to invoke an outraged response
Why not? I just get don’t get obsessive about him like you and some others.Any evidence of that? Don’t see you ever labelling Junker in such a way
Sigh
Just arguing black is white.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?