The problem is there is normally someone who wants to take over Europe. And they are normally German. The EU is taking over more of Europe all the time. And strangely enough Germans are taking over the EU. And the last one to take up a position in the EU.....the top job in the EU.....which broke rules and regulations.........is German. A German who has been the puppet master for years.No. I am not like that. I want a peaceful prosperous Europe. We share a history and we have fought each other for centuries. It would great if we could live together in peace. It would be a good example for the rest of the world as well.
Typical. Only look for the bad and ignore the good.
If you have time try reading this article. It will help your understanding of what has happened so far this century. Because you seem to be missing out on a lot.
The lost decade - BBC News
The thing is this word 'populism' has crept into many debates since Trump came to power & it's use is fraught with danger imo. It is nothing more than giving/telling voters what they want to hear. They must want to hear ut otherwise it wouldn't be popular. Referring to far-right populism is probably interpretting in many people's unconscious minds 'far right is poluar'. Then they are much more likely to give a sympathetic ear to what they consider popular.Would you want Brexit to be a success if it’s ultimate consequence was they other countries also left and the whole project collapsed?
? Tony made an observation. It’s about the consequences of the pound falling or fluctuations. What’s your point?
So the bank of the EU which is run by the EU and funded by countries of the EU and loans given out mainly to help countries in the EU (unless it is to work against the UK) has nothing to do with the EU?
And as the EIB called itself. The bank of the EU.
EIB - At a glance
The EIB is the European Union's bank. We are the only bank owned by and representing the interests of the European Union Member States. We work closely with other EU institutions to implement EU policy.
So which part don't you understand?
No. I am not like that. I want a peaceful prosperous Europe. We share a history and we have fought each other for centuries. It would great if we could live together in peace. It would be a good example for the rest of the world as well.
Dollar fluctuation has no impact unless it is a huge deviation
I honestly think you are a bit mad
The thing is this word 'populism' has crept into many debates since Trump came to power & it's use is fraught with danger imo. It is nothing more than giving/telling voters what they want to hear. They must want to hear ut otherwise it wouldn't be popular. Referring to far-right populism is probably interpretting in many people's unconscious minds 'far right is poluar'. Then they are much more likely to give a sympathetic ear to what they consider popular.
True populism is mainstream politics...coz that
Is where prople cast their votes.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
The problem is there is normally someone who wants to take over Europe. And they are normally German. The EU is taking over more of Europe all the time. And strangely enough Germans are taking over the EU. And the last one to take up a position in the EU.....the top job in the EU.....which broke rules and regulations.........is German. A German who has been the puppet master for years.
At least this attempt is without war for once.
Most of what you say is either a guess or not true. Then you have the nerve to say everyone who doesn't agree with you are wrong.
To Tony if it can't make the EU look good it doesn't exist or it is wrong.
In what way is he trying to make something look good? There are negative effects to Brexit. Currency fluctuations is one. Pointing it out doesn’t automatically make the EU look good. Just makes Brexit look like a risky idea. What do you expect? Everyone to think Brexit is a great idea whilst it is looking increasingly not like a good idea?
There is good and bad about the pound falling in value. There is good and bad about the pound gaining in value. But he is like you. He takes every situation and looks for bad in it. Then he looks for a way to blame the bad on Brexit. Just like you do.? Tony made an observation. It’s about the consequences of the pound falling or fluctuations. What’s your point?
Brexit is a risky thing to do short term. We all agree on that. But long term it is more risky staying in the EU and being told what to do against having your own destiny in your own hands.In what way is he trying to make something look good? There are negative effects to Brexit. Currency fluctuations is one. Pointing it out doesn’t automatically make the EU look good. Just makes Brexit look like a risky idea. What do you expect? Everyone to think Brexit is a great idea whilst it is looking increasingly not like a good idea?
Yes you want to look at a subsidiary to prove a point that doesn't exist. Why not look at the top? You can't twist what they say. So you want me to look elsewhere.I told you what to google, EIB UK, and I explained the difference about a subsidiary and say, the EU Council, Parliament or Commission ( The EU ).
So what part isn't true?As Grendel would say, „ oh god“.
Ah the AfD. Those you call insignificant. But when you talk about right wingers you call them dangerous. And you can't see the contradiction.Guess? I keep telling you facts e.g. about voting for AfD.. you just say I said something completely different and that that is wrong
Tony have you ever heard of the word hedging other than in a gardening context?
So you say a lot to not say anything.
Typical. Only look for the bad and ignore the good.
If you have time try reading this article. It will help your understanding of what has happened so far this century. Because you seem to be missing out on a lot.
The lost decade - BBC News
Dollar fluctuation has no impact unless it is a huge deviation
To Tony if it can't make the EU look good it doesn't exist or it is wrong.
Ah the AfD. Those you call insignificant. But when you talk about right wingers you call them dangerous. And you can't see the contradiction.
So what part isn't true?
The reason why you can't give a proper reply.
Why is currency fluctuations a bad thing?
Can also be a good thing, but it costs money to hedge against fluctuations which you don’t get, say, with the Euro as a member of the Eurozone.
Is there a cost to hedging? Is it 100% guaranteed? Is there a risk to it? Do small scale manufacturers have easy access to it. Do small scale manufacturers have the scope to fund hedging?
Yes, no, yes, no, no.
Sounds like Grendull is making a case for joining the Euro again.
Can also be a good thing, but it costs money to hedge against fluctuations which you don’t get, say, with the Euro as a member of the Eurozone.
So large manufacturers such as BMW and Mercedes don’t hedge? Is this a serious comment?
So large manufacturers such as BMW and Mercedes don’t hedge? Is this a serious comment?
You hedge when you receive or need foreign currency in the future. That way you can calculate your costs and profit margins. If you are dealing within one currency then you have nothing to hedge. Which is an advantage to those importing and exporting within the Eurozone. If they need materials from abroad then of course they will hedge. Rolls Royce engines didn’t hedge against the dollar which is why they went bankrupt and were reformed as Rolly Royce (1971) Limited. They have dropped 1971 since then.
Tony this discussion was about JLR and any impact on movement in US dollars. Not Fred Bloggs limited who employs one man and his dog.
I thought you were talking about Dollar fluctuation Tony
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?