Grendel
Well-Known Member
No Tony you were hopelessly and embarrassingly wrong. You believed we left the ERM 2 years after rates rose to 15% - its up there with the Geoffrey Howe speech.
When wiki man guesses with no wiki he’s a lonely man.
About as right as you.
Case closed - you and Tony are the best arguments on here to leave. Keep it going.
On here it's labelled as a neo liberal capitalist club one minute and the EUSSR the nextI was out celebrating reunification day. The end of communism in Germany. Pity some Tories and posters on here haven’t noticed that the USSR has gone. Some are stupid enough to compare communism with the EU. Noticeable that only leavers are that thick.
Shall we compare migration and the numbers over the years?Migration has been going on for decades and is nothing new. There's also the issue with people living longer as well. I blame successive governments for not building affordable homes, personally.
Regardless of where theyve come from, whether it be the East or West, migration on the whole has been positive for the country and has assisted in areas such as the NHS.
A reply to a post of mine.Wasted your vote if you voted leave on that basis.
I never said you did. And I see you’ve lost the argument again.
They have no right to reverse the decision. It is a watchdog without teeth.There were two hard investigations, both slammed the appointment, but they couldn’t find sufficient reason to reverse the decision
Why try to call it full employment then?
Why try to call it full employment then?
They have no right to reverse the decision. It is a watchdog without teeth.
The only ones who could reverse the decision are those who arranged and made the appointment.
So you don't think it is a problem that those who are in charge of the EU are bent?
Shall we compare migration and the numbers over the years?
Is migration a good thing for those who can't find a home to live in? And that includes those who have come here to live.
They have no right to reverse the decision. It is a watchdog without teeth.
The only ones who could reverse the decision are those who arranged and made the appointment.
So you don't think it is a problem that those who are in charge of the EU are bent?
They have no right to reverse the decision. It is a watchdog without teeth.
The only ones who could reverse the decision are those who arranged and made the appointment.
So you don't think it is a problem that those who are in charge of the EU are bent?
A reply to a post of mine.
Then you say.....
Argument? Not at all. I am an idiot for trying to have a debate with those who don't want one.
And yet again you come out with the line of it not being illegal. There are rules and regulations to be followed. None if it is covered by law. So it was impossible for a law to be broke. But every rule and regulation was broke.
These rules and regulations were broke by those who run the EU. Those who run the EU are the only ones who could do anything about it. But they didn't.
And my point has always been if they can do it so blatantly and still have nothing to worry about what else do they do? They have nobody to answer to. Yet you want the UK to be ruled by them.
Overplaying the fact that those at the top of the EU broke all rules and regulations that they should have complied with?You are deliberately overplaying the appointment and seem to think that nothing similar happens behind closed doors in Whitehall.
You claim that every decision is taken like Selmayr‘s appointment which means that the EU is completely corrupt. It obviously isn’t the case as there was uproar in the EU Parliament about it and two enquiries into it.
Caught you out being untruthful again I see.Clearly the meaning of the word “if” is lost on you. Maybe that’s why you’re an idiot. Attention to detail clearly isn’t your strong point.
So who has any power to stop those at the top of the EU from breaking all rules and regulations again?The ombudsman is a referee and has limited powers.
Why lie or twist the truth?So you have issues with all migration after the war, including those from the ex-colonies coming here? It's been going on for decades.
Caught you out being untruthful again I see.
'If you voted leave on that basis'
Why lie or twist the truth?
So we had a massive amount of homeless in the Times you have just mentioned?
Overplaying the fact that those at the top of the EU broke all rules and regulations that they should have complied with?
Yes there was absolute uproar in the EU parliament. Everyone in the EU knew it was wrong and shouldn't have happened and needed reversing. The EU watchdog said exactly the same. Yet nobody could do anything about it.
Underplayed?
Yesterday you finally agreed that it was a scam.
Those who run the EU are bent. They do what they want to do and nobody can do anything about it. Full stop.
Can you explain to everyone why we should trust them?
So who has any power to stop those at the top of the EU from breaking all rules and regulations again?
Not even thousands in the EU parliament being outspoken on the matter made any difference.
So who has any power to stop those at the top of the EU from breaking all rules and regulations again?
Not even thousands in the EU parliament being outspoken on the matter made any difference.
If for that reason means just that. For that reason.Yes “IF”. What do you actually think “IF” means. You really are an idiot.
Would you like to point out where I have blamed them?How am I lying or twisting the truth? Blaming people from other countries coming here to work for the homeless crisis really is low.
Oh no you didn't. You had a go at me each time I used them words. You called it unfortunate.I always agreed it was a scam, sham and annoying. You are making things up again.
How come to the conclusion that everyone in the EU is bent through one case that caused uproar in the EU?
We should trust them as keast as much as we trust our politicians. More than e.g. Rees Mogg, BoJo and the ever bullshitting MEP, Farage.
Bollocks.They are upgrading the rules to make sure it cannot happen again. The existing rules didn't account for what happened - no other candidate. The vote for deputy was convincing = 28:0. Obtained by, maybe, offering benefits to commissioners, but it is difficult to argue against 28:0. That is a majority result which is within the rules.
If for that reason means just that. For that reason.
Just the way you have constantly used words to insinuate things constantly.
Oh no you didn't. You had a go at me each time I used them words. You called it unfortunate.
Bollocks.
They put up another candidate. She pulled out 15 minutes after it was announced. So they made out Selmayr got it by default. Then she got a high up job with a massive wage for her troubles.
Never mind. Keep coming out with your excuses.
One more thing Mart.
You say they are upgrading the rules to stop it from happening again.
1, What is the use of having upgraded rules when they ignore rules and regulations?
2, Selmayr already has the job for life.
Oh no you didn't
No. I have a problem with liars and people who twist the truth to try and make a point.I think you may have issues either understanding the English language or you have issues with paranoia. Have you thought about buying a dictionary or seeking professional help.
Show me where you said scam then.No, I called it a scam and annoying. Never unfortunate.
Show me where you said scam then.
Annoying is such a hard word to use against such a blatant disregard for rules and regulations that those running the EU had.
They don't need a legal reason to take it off him. There isn't a law covering it. But if he wanted to take the EU to court he would have to show that he was rightfully given the role to start with. And even you eventually had to agree that he shouldn't have been given the role.Not bollocks and I am not disputing that there was only one candidate for General Secretary.
1. they don’t ignore regulations. They are accused of maladministration this time. Which I agree with. But, to deduce that that means everybody ignores regulations is crazy.
2. Yes, and as it wasn’t illegal there are no legal reasons for taking it off him. No one is claiming that he is not able enough. So all they can do is make sure people cannot get around the regulations in future.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?