So you are saying people must do things like you to respect your decision just because more people think that?How about you respecting our decision not to go in ?
In fact how about you giving it a go at going with the majority vote one week.
If it gets no reaction then you can tell us so.
"If your not part of the solution then your part of the problem"
I was being sarcastic. :sarcasm:[//QUOTE]
That was not sarcasm you moron, you have just debased the human tragedy that is occurring in Palestine. You ought to be fucking ashamed of yourself, but then people who appease sisu do not have a conscience or morals.
OK - if 100% of people did just the one thing then no divisoin. If any percentage of those same people then do something different to the others, then you now have two subsets and therefore division.
Having an opinion of those actions (either way) is not being divisive, it is merely having an opinion.
Example a two party democratic election. Differences in voting are divisive by their very nature - not any opinion on the reasons why people have/may vote(d).
Notice that I chose not to mention Sixfields, Sisu, ACL etc.. in any of the above - in order to not appear to be divisive.
So you are saying people must do things like you to respect your decision just because more people think that?
It works both ways, if people have a go at people on the hill for not going in its no different.
No I'm saying he has no respect for people staying away, in fact he is taking the piss.
In a democracy, don't people accept the majority view whether they agree with it or not ?
As for the hill it's irrelevant and confuses the real issue. I don't really know what they are achieving if there are no cameras there.
Well at least your honest!
Nobody has said thinking differently is divisive, abusing somebody because of it is.
Give everyone respect, you shouldnt have to earn it, the other side to that is once you lose it its hard to get back.Sorry but respect is not free you earn respect
No I'm saying he has no respect for people staying away, in fact he is taking the piss.
In a democracy, don't people accept the majority view whether they agree with it or not ?
As for the hill it's irrelevant and confuses the real issue. I don't really know what they are achieving if there are no cameras there.
Give everyone respect, you shouldnt have to earn it, the other side to that is once you lose it its hard to get back.
I agree with this. I treat everyone with respect whether I know them or not, unless they give me a pretty good reason not to, thn I ignore thme if I can - and I expect the same in return. Maybe that is why it has taken time to get used to using a forum.
Like your 'fingers crossed' response earlier Monners? Was that necessary or respectful?
Maybe I was merely gently teasing you a little bit, as indeed you were with others, much as I did when I chose to interject with your and MMM's tooing and froing the other day - which you very kindly offered a "like" for. We can all still have a bit of chuckle can't we without losing mutual respect?
So therefore you staying away is irrelevant because you're not on camera?
Sorry but they have, the very act of saying someone's opinion is divisive is in itself a divisive act, an opinion is of course not divisive, actions are, if I say I think those who attend are prolonging our stay but I respect their right to do so, this is an opinion, if i attempt to persuade or physically stop them attending that is divisive.Nobody has said thinking differently is divisive, abusing somebody because of it is.
Nobody has said thinking differently is divisive, abusing somebody because of it is.
In-fighting is pointless. It diverts attention from the real issues. The fans should be the ones united. No matter who you blame everyone wants to be back at the Ricoh.
There wouldn't be this sort of disagreement if SISU had not stolen our club.
A numerous number of people that post on this forum have the piss taken out of them purely for having a different opinion/non conformation of others opinions. The Thought police(As someone said last week) let posts go that are abusive if it conforms with their way of thinking, and clamp down if it doesn't. And YES! it is my belief as well as some others that Nick genuinely provokes arguments.......@ summerisle....When you evolve and get a brain people might start having some respect toward you.(Sarcasm) I've seen posts you've made on other forums(You haven't changed one iota have you?) Finally, respect IS EARNED not given for free, People don't have to interact with another poster to know whether they are worthy of respect. I more or less knew who weren't worthy of respect with the exception of one or two that have proven me wrong, and which I hold in the highest regard. I've looked on countless football forums, and found that 99% of them have nothing but respect for each other, This forum however is by far and away the worst of them all for inhouse fighting.
Surely it depends on what can be judged as abuse? When you start calling people names and they reply and say things back what then?
You have sent me threatening pms on a number of occasions being billy big balls. Now compare that to somebody ribbing you because you said you had famous friends and they said it was the chuckle brothers or something.
If people go around punching people and one day get a harder punch back then it's only fair. Same as when people give grendel stick, he isn't shy at giving stick so you have to judge the situation don't you?
Which posts have been deleted and stuff simply because they aren't agreed with? Go on tell me.
I haven't abused anyone. I merely gave my opinion and you told me I was being devisive.
@ Nick.....You closed two threads last week, and when asked why the post was locked you went and fucking locked that as well. As for threats..I told you last week you can put up on the open forum what I've said to you I've got fuck all to hide or be ashamed of. You and some other of your"Admin" mates are wankers. @ covmark...You remind me of the little tosser at the back of the gang that eggs others to start fighting, but when it comes near to you, you fucking shit yourself and run....I've seen many like you at HR. Start a fight then run like fuck and leave it to others to finish it. I've got a scar on my left hand from a bike chain off a Wolves fan through wankers like you pal.
Because you saying it is divisive, the same as if somebody said "everybody on the hill is wrong and causing more damage than good". It is their view, but it is still divisive isn't it?
People do have a right to do whatever they want, but when they started having a go at others because they have different views then it is divisive. Whether it is because they are going into games or standing on the hill.
Divisive:
causing a lot of disagreement between people and causing them to separate into different groups. Full Definition of DIVISIVE. : creating disunity
Lots people have posted "no one likes SISU idiot" or something similar. SISU started all this nonsense and dilemma around Sixfields, attend, go on hill, stay away.
In my mind if anyone is guilty of being divisive it is SISU.
In my mind if anyone is guilty of being divisive it is SISU.
I told a little fib in that last post.........................It's my RIGHT hand not left.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?