Who says it is NOPM? A lot of it is people that have had enough of the way we have been run for years. Mainly from the Richardson years onwards.
Who says it is NOPM?
Surely it is mainly NOPM, I dont think that many gave up due to Richardson even though that piece of shit started our road to ruin.
Who was that bloke bleating on about not going to games anymore and NOPM and his morals etc then it came out he lived in Australia and couldn't go anyway. That was amusing.
No Tony "fans" like him won't go! Even his one brain cell can work out NOPM as a principal to starve sisu out can't work as 13,000 people stick two fingers up to it.
We don't need fans who are negative, by principal are opposed to any one who attends and fails to even comprehend the owners actually take nothing from the club. It's a self sufficient operation so only supporters who out their hands in their pocket are good enough. The rest can go away.
Another crock of shit. You don't even know who the guy is let alone know him.
I don't really know the whole scenario here but I get the jist.
Look, he may be a bit of drama queen about blathering on about nopm but you have to respect his view. You have to assume it's genuine I guess. If it is then that's his choice and I don't consider him any less of a fan than anyone else. ( I hate this comparing gradings of fans)
If sisu hadn't of moved us to Northampton then people like Nigel wouldn't have an excuse. So don't blame Nigel blame the game.
I hate sisu hopefully like everyone else as the pain they have caused is indescribable. I still go home and away though and put myself above the politics. I didn't go to Northampon however.
We know the case now we are self funded and we are playing I don't care what you say the Ricoh is our home regardless of wasps. I enjoy the Ricoh it's a fantastic stadium and the facilities are fantastic.
I respect any given fans view even though I thought it was madness to go to six fields I still didn't ridicule fans for it. I'm just glad more seen it like I did.
I personally think his view should be respected all be it a self hurting policy against ccfc he has undertaken.
Who the fuck is Nigel anyway?
Do you know him?
No. Probably why I'm not passing judgment on him.
Look, he may be a bit of drama queen about blathering on about nopm but you have to respect his view. You have to assume it's genuine I guess. If it is then that's his choice and I don't consider him any less of a fan than anyone else. ( I hate this comparing gradings of fans)
People can choose not to go for all sorts of reasons and if they're not going because of some particular stance then fair enough. What I genuinely don't understand is what those who are as a matter of principle not putting money into the club think it is achieving.
There seems to be this idea in some sections that if you pay £20 to go to a game it goes straight to Joy yet over and over again the likes of OSB have said there is no evidence to suggest SISU are taking money out. The only thing being negatively impacted as far as I can see is the club, a separate entity to the owners.
Do you know me? Do you know RFC?
Good job you don't pass judgement on things and people you have never met ay?
No. Probably why I'm not passing judgment on him.
Oh I switched on and he was droning on about never going again - nothing that would give sisu money - the odd away game - never a Wembley final - it gives sisu money - never if we get promoted - it gives sisu money.
Why doesn't he bore off and support someone else.
If Grendull, RFC or anyone else for matter take issue with anything I have to say on anything or about them they can take it up with me on the same media that I'm delivering that message on.
It's funny that the people who got on there high horses when people were having a go at fans attending Sixfields don't have the same principles about fans who won't go to home games while SISU are owners. I thought it was all down to the individuals personal choice and no one has the right to say otherwise? Or is it a case of now the shoe is on the other foot the rule book is rewritten?
Thanks for that Kilroy Silk
People can choose not to go for all sorts of reasons and if they're not going because of some particular stance then fair enough. What I genuinely don't understand is what those who are as a matter of principle not putting money into the club think it is achieving.
There seems to be this idea in some sections that if you pay £20 to go to a game it goes straight to Joy yet over and over again the likes of OSB have said there is no evidence to suggest SISU are taking money out. The only thing being negatively impacted as far as I can see is the club, a separate entity to the owners.
Super Sixfield Fans telling other fans to go and support someone else because they continue to voice their dissatisfaction about owners, seems a bit rich.
Yes I agree. I honestly think they are oblivious we are a self run club now. If we had 25k fans each week then we would have more money in the pot and create a better team and better winning football.
We received a lot of money from the Leon clarke and Callum wilson sales but these weren't invested back into the club but to pay off the losses that Sixfields caused, better quality on the pitch should have increased results bigger crowds etc... we chose to do the sisu way short term contracts mostly crap players. I struggle with all ours fans commending SISU for their financial management when they orchestrated the Sixfields move that was a short term financial disaster and a medium term disaster also with the lost fans and WASPS getting our stadium.
NOPM is a convenient excuse for some but the reason there was only 6,000 at the Swindon home game (official crowd said 7,000 but there was a clear exaggeration) is because under our current owners their poor management of the club, northampton, losing the stadium, court cases - has driven fans away. they will return if we have a good run but even if we win tomorrow tuesday nights gate will still struggle to be above 10,000.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?