Only what I've heard, usually a good source as he knows people connected to the club. If I was them watching him this season I'd be backing out ASAP. It might however explain some of his lacklustre performances
Forest want fleck? Good he is a disaster.
Like christie!Only what I've heard, usually a good source as he knows people connected to the club. If I was them watching him this season I'd be backing out ASAP. It might however explain some of his lacklustre performances
Like christie!
Well reading that lot's given me a good laugh!
Well reading that lot's given me a good laugh!
How convenient! It's almost like it's a load of BS as usual.
Wasn't sure who Peter Ward was so googled him and got this report from the CT "Peter Ward ... who has previously been reported stating he believes Sisu are acting in the best interests of the football club" and of course it's been documented before that Jonathan Strange resigned as chair of the LSG when they proposed to not attend Sixfields. Seems that two people who could very much be labelled 'pro SISU' have been selected and will now hide behind confidentiality to avoid reporting back to the very people they are supposed to be representing.
Yeah a bit like that, it's only what I've been told though and he could be wrong but he's usually very reliable and always gets good gossip from what's going on at the club.
Well reading that lot's given me a good laugh!
They will have signed a confidentiality agreement so no
I would think messrs Ward and Strange will not have told anyone where the site preferred is, including the SCG who they are supposed to be reporting to. "we know but we cant/wont tell you". Why discuss it at all if the representatives can not report back or provide any substance to it.
Still don't quite understand who Ward and Strange think they represent and how though to be honest
Quite absurd really .............whats the point of having representation if the fans cant know the result of that representation........ but it does mean they (laurel & hardy) get the flack for a while not TF or SW or SISU :thinking about:
If the scheme is still on going why was Garlicks little group wound down in to the SCG?
Which would be fine if the "fans" on the board were trusted by fans and were actually representing us, however when 2 SISU puppets are allowed in, have their strings pulled and come out telling us it smells of roses in there it's all completely meaningless. If someone smart, honest, trustworthy, informed and able to see through spin and bullshit like OSB was given a place on the board and came out saying he'd been convinced then it would mean something.
What's funny? In May 2013, we were told by Fisher that he expected the purchase of land to be completed in 'three to four weeks'. We were assured that a suitable site was 'to be found in time for June's meeting with Football League'.
Now 18 months later, after much buggering about, litigation and Judicial Review condemnation of SISU's actions; we're further away than ever, and a rugby club, originally from London have effective control over the place CCFC plays football. A new stadium is further away that peace in the Middle East. And you've had a 'good laugh'. You're either a WUM, or posting from an institutionalised environment
In fairness mate he does pretty well. I mean have you tried typing in a strait-jacket? It's hell on your nose, capitalisation is particularly tricky, and Ctrl+Alt+Del is a total non-starter...
Just to be clear the rest of the SCG - which currently includes the Sky Blue Trust - have NOT been informed by Mr Strange and Mr Ward of the details of the board meeting which they were at representing the SCG. The Trust is not with holding the information - we, along with other SCG members, have simply not been told. Maybe something will be issued to fellow members but at last night SCG meeting all Mr Strange would say was that a statement would be issued by the club today - didn't go down well with some in attendance, especially those who had travelled long distances to be told that!
I would not trust anyone with the surname - Mr Strange.. sounds all to dodgy to me.
Plenty of room around the back of Leekes's store.
So, Wasps and CCC hiding behind confidentiality is OK and understandable, but not the club?
So, Wasps and CCC hiding behind confidentiality is OK and understandable, but not the club?
Just to be clear the rest of the SCG - which currently includes the Sky Blue Trust - have NOT been informed by Mr Strange and Mr Ward of the details of the board meeting which they were at representing the SCG. The Trust is not with holding the information - we, along with other SCG members, have simply not been told. Maybe something will be issued to fellow members but at last night SCG meeting all Mr Strange would say was that a statement would be issued by the club today - didn't go down well with some in attendance, especially those who had travelled long distances to be told that!
Load of drivel.
Lets hope it's the club flexing their muscles in trying to get a good long term deal at the Ricoh.
Unfortunately everybody, including Wasps, know it's Sisu talk only.
As soon as a stadium site is known it will be leaked. It's not difficult to do.
I would think messrs Ward and Strange will not have told anyone where the site preferred is, including the SCG who they are supposed to be reporting to. "we know but we cant/wont tell you". Why discuss it at all if the representatives can not report back or provide any substance to it.
Still don't quite understand who Ward and Strange think they represent and how though to be honest
Quite absurd really .............whats the point of having representation if the fans cant know the result of that representation........ but it does mean they (laurel & hardy) get the flack for a while not TF or SW or SISU :thinking about:
If the scheme is still on going why was Garlicks little group wound down in to the SCG?
Those magical hypothetical villains you're always rallying against. They're terrible, whoever they are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?