SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
He’s said 3 and then reconsider to be fair! The 10 could still be on
He’s on thin ice.He did say we would take stock. So not set in stone
He’s said 3 and then reconsider to be fair! The 10 could still be on
He’s on thin ice.He did say we would take stock. So not set in stone
The ‘10 signings’ comment was incredibly dumb from Robins in terms of managing expectationsRobins has downgraded his 10 (said when we had signed 5) to another 3 (would mean 6 in since he said 10). I won’t forget these lies, Mark.
3 more is about right imo. No need to panic
Most likely Dragus and a striker then another CB as you say. He sounded like he wanted these 3 in before he makes his final call on HamerHas to be x2 attackers/fwds and a LCB.
When Gus goes a replacement for him (marquee signing).
The ‘10 signings’ comment was incredibly dumb from Robins in terms of managing expectations
I’m starting to think it was the existing squad rather than the fans who were the intended audience for that ‘10 signings’ commentAbsolutely. The club could so with a comms advisor. King and Robins need a bit of tutition
The ‘10 signings’ comment was incredibly dumb from Robins in terms of managing expectations
I think it’s looking more like a message to Hamer than the fans now tbhYeah I can't think why he said that considering he's now pretty much halved it!
Has to be x2 attackers/fwds and a LCB.
When Gus goes a replacement for him (marquee signing).
Or maybe he was putting pressure on those responsible to pull their finger out.The ‘10 signings’ comment was incredibly dumb from Robins in terms of managing expectations
I think he was trying to give some reassurance to players who were wanting for reasons to stay, in light of interest from other clubs and/or other compelling reasons to leave.Or maybe he was putting pressure on those responsible to pull their finger out.
Or sending a message to the players that no one is guaranteed a start
MR tends to know what he's doing.
Absolutely. The club could so with a comms advisor. King and Robins need a bit of tutition
'Can we go back to Burnley and ask them to swap McNally for Hamer + £8 million?'
Don't forget Twine'Can we go back to Burnley and ask them to swap McNally for Hamer + £8 million?'
Not going to lie I still don't get why we're content for McNally to go and strengthen someone else when we had first dibs even on a loan. I will die on that hillDon't forget Twine
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
I agree, i'd take him back on loan for sure. Would have thought he can play in the middle and i think Fadz will be phased out this season, thats my hill.Not going to lie I still don't get why we're content for McNally to go and strengthen someone else when we had first dibs even on a loan. I will die on that hill
Think we wanted him permanently rather than another loan.Stoke can offer more of his wages than us????
Burnley don't want to sell him thoThink we wanted him permanently rather than another loan.
Rather a loan than not having him at all. He fit in well here and improved.Think we wanted him permanently rather than another loan.
We won't get him now. For me our interest in McNally ended when we signed Thomas.Rather a loan than not having him at all. He fit in well here and improved.
Think will be 2. Maybe 3 in the endThe leaked pictures confirm it. Welcome Haji Wright! 6 more to go.
Think will be 2. Maybe 3 in the end
The leaked pictures confirm it. Welcome Haji Wright! 6 more to go.
which ones?
Probably a loan fee that put us off, no point sinking money into fees when we get no resale benefitsStoke can offer more of his wages than us????