Mick Scoop
Member
No danger of that sicknote, Sisu were laughed out of court yesterday by all accounts, even RFC has disappeared up his own arse.......
I am intrigued to see the excuses and allegations that will be posted on this forum if CCC lose the JR.
No danger of that sicknote, Sisu were laughed out of court yesterday by all accounts, even RFC has disappeared up his own arse.......
There is no deal to be done then reading all of this. We are doomed in Northampton 100%.
Forget it guys. Seriously.
Ccc/ACL only want rental deal and give away some income streams but sisu want unemcurered freehold. It's not going to happen. Sisu will never get the freehold and sisu won't ever rent.
Game over.
Bring back Richardson, eh?
I am intrigued to see the excuses and allegations that will be posted on this forum if CCC lose the JR.
I'm already warming up Judge Prickinbotham.
I am intrigued to see the excuses and allegations that will be posted on this forum if Sisu lose the JR.
you saw it in the higgs case. i remember posters saying that sisu won the higgs case. no, they came away without their counter claim and had to pay there own cost and higgs came away without there claim and had to pay their own cost. thats a draw by any stretch of the imagination.
Higgs took the case to court - the claim was invalid. Stop being pathetic.
If sisu lose the JR
"Ha ha fuck off sisu"
"I love the council"
"The council squash the hedge fund"
"The sisu posee are in hiding lol!!!!!"
Meanwhile back at Sixfields......,
I am intrigued to see the excuses and allegations that will be posted on this forum if Sisu lose the JR.
you saw it in the higgs case. i remember posters saying that sisu won the higgs case. no, they came away without their counter claim and had to pay there own cost and higgs came away without there claim and had to pay their own cost. thats a draw by any stretch of the imagination.
You also saw people cheering Higgs on like they were a football team to win. Like it was a last penalty to win the FA cup or something.
To be honest, while reading that case I was fully expecting Higgs to have got their money from reading it, turns out they didn't.
You also saw people cheering Higgs on like they were a football team to win. Like it was a last penalty to win the FA cup or something.
indeed they were. the OP i replied to suggested that excuses would only come from one section of posters should one particular party win. i was just re-addressing the balance in the interest of harmony, anyone who's been on here for more than 2 weeks would know there is going to be excuses posted whatever the outcome.
So the council borrowed £14 million against a company valued less than half that? Not a great use of state aid is it?
The same can be said about ACL & CCC as well. Anyone who doesn't cheer them on is regarded as supporting SISU.
I am intrigued to see the excuses and allegations that will be posted on this forum if CCC lose the JR.
They are a local charity that got involved thinking they were helping our club out..
Higgs took the case to court - the claim was invalid. Stop being pathetic.
If sisu lose the JR
"Ha ha fuck off sisu"
"I love the council"
"The council squash the hedge fund"
"The sisu posee are in hiding lol!!!!!"
Meanwhile back at Sixfields......,
Were they really laughed out of court? Did it all look bad for them?
This may not be a popular thought...
Well, I say 'may'
But it could be argued that that local charity went outside their remit, as much because Sir Derek Higgs was on the board as the club failed. It's not like they just popped up from nowehere, and it's the kind of shuffle that if the Seppala charity foundation bought Ryton off the club to enable the club to continue, people would be up in arms about...
Just a thought... that perhaps in stopping the club going into administration by buying its saleable assets, it also helped maintain the board at the time's position.
Am sure PWKH will be along to correct me
No, but RFC has vanished up his own arse - FACT! PUSB! IMHO! Steve and the lads..... etc. etc. etc.
No, but RFC has vanished up his own arse - FACT! PUSB! IMHO! Steve and the lads..... etc. etc. etc.
(we're back to the illogical nature of the "business" side of football aren't we?)
The same can be said about ACL & CCC as well. Anyone who doesn't cheer them on is regarded as supporting SISU.
We are.
But there is a way of approaching it... that that board at the time had failed, should leave the club, hand it over to decent owners... and any short term influx of cash to help the cashflow and stop them selling up wasn't necessarily in the club's interests...
It's all in the perspective and how you choose to write the narrative.
Which is why the club should be given a share of the cake. The valuation goes up dramatically due to one tenant who has paid thfor e whole mortgage for years and receive a very poor deal.
The council and ACL are in la la land if they think anyone will return purely on a rental basis when the club will have a massive impact on the value of ACL.
The club should've gone bust long ago, and possibly still should (though Godiva's theory/idea about ARVO buying out the other investors gives me some hope on that front), but who wants to be the guy who let the club go bust? Which true City fans doesn't believe we're about to turn the corner? You can understand why what was done was done, even if hindsight is 20/20.
The day the court system is judged on RFC's posting habits is the day I beg you to find me a job in Kiel and I get the hell out this country!
Hmmm.
I'll remove this from my previous posts in this thread, just for clarity of anybody who may want to threaten me with a libel suit
But I'd strongly suggest there's a narrative that says certain members of the board at the time were not motivated by thinking about the good of the club; there was after all a reason why Derrick Robins had to be tricked out of his shares.
Substitute Go SISU go for Go Robinson Go, expect them to leave and just write off everything they've pumped in because the club's more important than their investment, and they should stop trying to protect it...
If we're going down a narrative of saving the club, then we need to hail SISU as our saviours too, and I for one am not comfortable with that!
Hmmm.
I'll remove this from my previous posts in this thread, just for clarity of anybody who may want to threaten me with a libel suit
But I'd strongly suggest there's a narrative that says certain members of the board (see! this is where I need to distance from the other posts for the purposes of clarity!) at the time were not motivated by thinking about the good of the club; there was after all a reason why Derrick Robins had to be tricked out of his shares.
Substitute Go SISU go for Go Robinson Go, expect them to leave and just write off everything they've pumped in because the club's more important than their investment, and they should stop trying to protect it...
If we're going down a narrative of saving the club, then we need to hail SISU as our saviours too, and I for one am not comfortable with that!
Also, apologies for quashing your ARVO hope, but if the clock's set to zero there's a reason it's sold at a big discount, and that's because it's a massive risk, that anybody buying it is fully aware may go horribly wrong, but they're prepared to take that chance...
Higgs took the case to court - the claim was invalid. Stop being pathetic.
If sisu lose the JR
"Ha ha fuck off sisu"
"I love the council"
"The council squash the hedge fund"
"The sisu posee are in hiding lol!!!!!"
Meanwhile back at Sixfields......,
Didn't Derrick Robins do a runner to South Africa with his secretary...or something like that?
He also sold his shares and (I forget which way round it was!) he explicitly didn't want Robinson/Richardson involved in the club, so the other party bought them... then sold them straight on to their colleague.
I'm not sure it's 100% either way. Richardson, McGinnity, etc. I can buy ripping the club off Higgs, etc. I'm not so sure. There has to be some genuine City fans out there and I'm not sure the Charity has done particularly well out of any deals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?