skybluegaz2
New Member
The Way I See It:-
Scenario 1:
If the role of the administrator is to get the best deal for the creditors, then, as they are the major creditor, it's a shoe-in SISU will win the bid for Ltd
Scenario 2:
If the role of the administrator is to protect the long-term future of the "business" then why would he choose SISU who have run the club into the ground, accumulated vast debts (supposedly) since they took the club over, and alienated the fans by their vision of moving the club lock stock and barrel outside the City, as well as trying to destroy another asset vital to the future of the club - the Academy.
SISU are clearly banking on scenario 1. I think Appleton sees his role also as per Scenario 1.
The fly in the ointment for them both is that waiting in the wings is definitely 1 multi-millionaire (possibly 2) and a consortium of what is surmised to be "football based people."
So I see it as short-term pain (he will choose SISU), but a long-term gain, as up to 3 consortiums will mount either a High-Court challenge or an agressive takeover bid. It is our duty as fans if Scenario 1 happens, we starve SISU of funds in order for any such takeover to happen.
Scenario 1:
If the role of the administrator is to get the best deal for the creditors, then, as they are the major creditor, it's a shoe-in SISU will win the bid for Ltd
Scenario 2:
If the role of the administrator is to protect the long-term future of the "business" then why would he choose SISU who have run the club into the ground, accumulated vast debts (supposedly) since they took the club over, and alienated the fans by their vision of moving the club lock stock and barrel outside the City, as well as trying to destroy another asset vital to the future of the club - the Academy.
SISU are clearly banking on scenario 1. I think Appleton sees his role also as per Scenario 1.
The fly in the ointment for them both is that waiting in the wings is definitely 1 multi-millionaire (possibly 2) and a consortium of what is surmised to be "football based people."
So I see it as short-term pain (he will choose SISU), but a long-term gain, as up to 3 consortiums will mount either a High-Court challenge or an agressive takeover bid. It is our duty as fans if Scenario 1 happens, we starve SISU of funds in order for any such takeover to happen.